Discussion:
John Cleese Announces He Is Leaving Britain To Protest Childish Far Right Unpatriotic Neo-Nazis and The Lying Rightist Media
Add Reply
Robert Charles Williamson
2018-07-12 23:56:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
John Cleese says he is moving to the Caribbean in November in protest of the
"awful" debate on Brexit.
The 78-year-old told BBC Two's Newsnight that he now plans to relocate to the
"gorgeous" island of Nevis - which has a population of just 11,000 - in the
autumn.
"I'm leaving in November. I actually am leaving. I am making arrangements
now," said the long-time Liberal Democrat supporter. "I am so disappointed
with so much about this country at the moment and I just think so much of
this country is disappointing."
Cleese, who backed leave in the 2016 EU referendum, went on to brand the
standard of debate around Brexit "awful".
He said: "One of the most depressing things about this country was the
standard of debate about Brexit. It was awful, there were dreadful lies on
the right about all the money that would come into the National Health
Service and just scare tactics from Cameron and Osborne."


He continued: "Very few people have any idea of what's actually going to
happen. Why's everyone so passionate when they can't possibly know what the
outcome is?" he asked.
He added that he has "particular beef" with the "lying and triviality" of
British newspapers.
aussieman
2018-07-16 05:20:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Presumably the reason the subject is relevant to this newsgroup is because without Britain Australia would NOT exist!
SG1
2018-07-16 05:27:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aussieman
Presumably the reason the subject is relevant to this newsgroup is because
without Britain Australia would NOT exist!
Without Australia the poms would have no where to move to.
aussieman
2018-07-31 23:16:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
You are simply generalising. Some people in England move to the south of France if they want to live outside Britain,there are some people from England who move to Spain.
news18
2018-08-01 05:39:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aussieman
You are simply generalising. Some people in England move to the south of
France if they want to live outside Britain,there are some people from
England who move to Spain.
Umm, his choice wouldn't be a tax haven would it.
Petzl
2018-08-02 04:15:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by news18
Post by aussieman
You are simply generalising. Some people in England move to the south of
France if they want to live outside Britain,there are some people from
England who move to Spain.
Umm, his choice wouldn't be a tax haven would it.
Might be a wife haven?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3931546/I-wish-dead-John-Cleese-makes-shocking-remark-ex-wives-hails-children-cause-misery-world-grow-like-mothers.html
https://is.gd/wawF3p
--
Petzl
If voting made any difference,
they wouldn't let us do it- Mark Twain
Daniel60
2018-07-16 09:54:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aussieman
Presumably the reason the subject is relevant to this newsgroup is
because without Britain Australia would NOT exist!
Yeap, probably be called something totally different ..... or be broken
up into many something differents!!
--
Daniel
news18
2018-07-16 14:19:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Daniel60
Post by aussieman
Presumably the reason the subject is relevant to this newsgroup is
because without Britain Australia would NOT exist!
Yeap, probably be called something totally different ..... or be broken
up into many something differents!!
Er, South China, or New France.
Daniel60
2018-07-20 06:49:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by news18
Post by Daniel60
Post by aussieman
Presumably the reason the subject is relevant to this newsgroup is
because without Britain Australia would NOT exist!
Yeap, probably be called something totally different ..... or be broken
up into many something differents!!
Er, South China, or New France.
South China a possibility. I read a book, back in the 70's I think, that
proposed, after Indonesia had invaded, part of the continent would be
named "South Irian", i.e. sort of like West Papua used to be known as
West Irian, but South of that.

I was thinking that there were supposed to be about 500 tribal lands on
this continent before the Dutch and then British landed here and made
things the way they wanted it!
--
Daniel
news18
2018-07-20 11:42:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Daniel60
Post by news18
Post by Daniel60
Post by aussieman
Presumably the reason the subject is relevant to this newsgroup is
because without Britain Australia would NOT exist!
Yeap, probably be called something totally different ..... or be
broken up into many something differents!!
Er, South China, or New France.
South China a possibility. I read a book, back in the 70's I think, that
proposed, after Indonesia had invaded, part of the continent would be
named "South Irian", i.e. sort of like West Papua used to be known as
West Irian, but South of that.
I was thinking that there were supposed to be about 500 tribal lands on
this continent before the Dutch and then British landed here and made
things the way they wanted it!
The Chinese had a period of expansion a few centuries ago. some stories
that they made it into the Atlantic via Cape hope, but definitely around
India and eastern Africa. Thjat recent stuff about aussie Galah being
traded to a RC pope or such is just ho hum for the trade that was taking
place well before even the Portugese went exploring. Then the Chinese
officially went isolationist, butr the people kept on streaming into SE
Asia.

The Chinese didn't "discover" Australia aka make it know to the rest of
the world, just like the guy Torres, who passed south of Papua-New Guinea
didn't either.

When James Cook was "discovering" the east coast, the French were also
poking around, but that guy went missing. I think if Philip hasn't been
sent out with the First Fleet, there is a good chance another French
bloke would have been next.
Petzl
2018-07-20 19:06:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by news18
Post by Daniel60
Post by news18
Post by Daniel60
Post by aussieman
Presumably the reason the subject is relevant to this newsgroup is
because without Britain Australia would NOT exist!
Yeap, probably be called something totally different ..... or be
broken up into many something differents!!
Er, South China, or New France.
South China a possibility. I read a book, back in the 70's I think, that
proposed, after Indonesia had invaded, part of the continent would be
named "South Irian", i.e. sort of like West Papua used to be known as
West Irian, but South of that.
I was thinking that there were supposed to be about 500 tribal lands on
this continent before the Dutch and then British landed here and made
things the way they wanted it!
The Chinese had a period of expansion a few centuries ago. some stories
that they made it into the Atlantic via Cape hope, but definitely around
India and eastern Africa. Thjat recent stuff about aussie Galah being
traded to a RC pope or such is just ho hum for the trade that was taking
place well before even the Portugese went exploring. Then the Chinese
officially went isolationist, butr the people kept on streaming into SE
Asia.
The Chinese didn't "discover" Australia aka make it know to the rest of
the world, just like the guy Torres, who passed south of Papua-New Guinea
didn't either.
When James Cook was "discovering" the east coast, the French were also
poking around, but that guy went missing. I think if Philip hasn't been
sent out with the First Fleet, there is a good chance another French
bloke would have been next.
What stopped the French officially claiming Australia was the French
Revolution.
--
Petzl
If voting made any difference,
they wouldn't let us do it- Mark Twain
Daniel60
2018-07-21 12:26:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by news18
Post by Daniel60
Post by news18
Post by Daniel60
Post by aussieman
Presumably the reason the subject is relevant to this
newsgroup is because without Britain Australia would NOT
exist!
Yeap, probably be called something totally different ..... or
be broken up into many something differents!!
Er, South China, or New France.
South China a possibility. I read a book, back in the 70's I think,
that proposed, after Indonesia had invaded, part of the continent
would be named "South Irian", i.e. sort of like West Papua used to
be known as West Irian, but South of that.
I was thinking that there were supposed to be about 500 tribal
lands on this continent before the Dutch and then British landed
here and made things the way they wanted it!
The Chinese had a period of expansion a few centuries ago. some
stories that they made it into the Atlantic via Cape hope, but
definitely around India and eastern Africa. Thjat recent stuff about
aussie Galah being traded to a RC pope or such is just ho hum for the
trade that was taking place well before even the Portugese went
exploring. Then the Chinese officially went isolationist, butr the
people kept on streaming into SE Asia.
The Chinese didn't "discover" Australia aka make it know to the rest
of the world, just like the guy Torres, who passed south of Papua-New
Guinea didn't either.
When James Cook was "discovering" the east coast, the French were
also poking around, but that guy went missing. I think if Philip
hasn't been sent out with the First Fleet, there is a good chance
another French bloke would have been next.
Strikes me, there's a Sydney suburb named in honour of a French Captain
that followed a couple of days behind Phillip, Le Per0use or some such.
--
Daniel
Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
2018-07-23 02:01:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Daniel60
Post by news18
Post by Daniel60
Post by news18
Post by Daniel60
Post by aussieman
Presumably the reason the subject is relevant to this
newsgroup is because without Britain Australia would NOT
exist!
Yeap, probably be called something totally different ..... or
be broken up into many something differents!!
Er, South China, or New France.
South China a possibility. I read a book, back in the 70's I think,
that proposed, after Indonesia had invaded, part of the continent
would be named "South Irian", i.e. sort of like West Papua used to
be known as West Irian, but South of that.
I was thinking that there were supposed to be about 500 tribal
lands on this continent before the Dutch and then British landed
here and made things the way they wanted it!
The Chinese had a period of expansion a few centuries ago. some
stories that they made it into the Atlantic via Cape hope, but
definitely around India and eastern Africa. Thjat recent stuff about
aussie Galah being traded to a RC pope or such is just ho hum for the
trade that was taking place well before even the Portugese went
exploring. Then the Chinese officially went isolationist, butr the
people kept on streaming into SE Asia.
The Chinese didn't "discover" Australia aka make it know to the rest
of the world, just like the guy Torres, who passed south of Papua-New
Guinea didn't either.
When James Cook was "discovering" the east coast, the French were
also poking around, but that guy went missing. I think if Philip
hasn't been sent out with the First Fleet, there is a good chance
another French bloke would have been next.
Strikes me, there's a Sydney suburb named in honour of a French Captain
that followed a couple of days behind Phillip, Le Per0use or some such.
Yeah, and that was 10 years after Cook.

Also, La Perouse and his crew were shipwrecked and then murdered and eaten by the Torres Straight islanders. Another proud moment in the history of indigenous Australia.
Daniel60
2018-07-23 07:51:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
<Snip>
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Daniel60
Post by news18
When James Cook was "discovering" the east coast, the French
were also poking around, but that guy went missing. I think if
Philip hasn't been sent out with the First Fleet, there is a good
chance another French bloke would have been next.
Strikes me, there's a Sydney suburb named in honour of a French
Captain that followed a couple of days behind Phillip, Le Per0use
or some such.
Yeah, and that was 10 years after Cook.
Also, La Perouse and his crew were shipwrecked and then murdered and
eaten by the Torres Straight islanders. Another proud moment in the
history of indigenous Australia.
So, ten years after Cook makes it 1780 ... I thought it was just after
Capt Phillip, i.e. 1788!!

Natives will be natives!
--
Daniel
Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
2018-07-26 03:46:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Daniel60
<Snip>
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Daniel60
Post by news18
When James Cook was "discovering" the east coast, the French
were also poking around, but that guy went missing. I think if
Philip hasn't been sent out with the First Fleet, there is a good
chance another French bloke would have been next.
Strikes me, there's a Sydney suburb named in honour of a French
Captain that followed a couple of days behind Phillip, Le Per0use
or some such.
Yeah, and that was 10 years after Cook.
Also, La Perouse and his crew were shipwrecked and then murdered and
eaten by the Torres Straight islanders. Another proud moment in the
history of indigenous Australia.
So, ten years after Cook makes it 1780 ... I thought it was just after
Capt Phillip, i.e. 1788!!
Good point. The last time Cook put into Australia was in January 1777, but he did not sail up the East coast on that trip.
Topaz
2018-07-26 02:13:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Some quotes from Mein Kampf:

"The man who is not opposed and vilified and slandered in the
Jewish Press is not a staunch German and not a true National
Socialist. The best rule whereby the sincerity of his convictions, his
character and strength of will, can be measured is by the hostility
which his name arouses among the mortal enemies of our people.

"The followers of the movement, and indeed the whole nation,
must be reminded again and again of the fact that, through the medium
of his newspapers, the Jew is always spreading falsehood and that if
he tells the truth on some occasions it is only for the purpose of
masking some greater deceit, which turns the apparent truth into a
deliberate falsehood. The Jew is the Great Master of Lies. Falsehood
and duplicity are the weapons with which he fights.

"Every calumny and falsehood published by the Jews are tokens of
honor which can be worn by our comrades. He whom they decry most is
nearest to our hearts and he whom they mortally hate is our best
friend.

"If a comrade of ours opens a Jewish newspaper in the morning
and does not find himself vilified there, then he has spent yesterday
to no account. For if he had achieved something he would be
persecuted, slandered, derided and abused. Those who effectively
combat this mortal enemy of our people, who is at the same time the
enemy of all Aryan peoples and all culture, can only expect to arouse
opposition on the part of this race and become the object of its
slanderous attacks.

"When these truths become part of the flesh and blood, as it
were, of our members, then the movement will be impregnable and
invincible."

" Then I began to examine my favorite 'World Press', with that fact
before my mind. "The deeper my soundings went the lesser grew my
respect for that Press which I formerly admired. Its style became
still more repellant and I was forced to reject its ideas as entirely
shallow and superficial. To claim that in the presentation of facts
and views its attitude was impartial seemed to me to contain more
falsehood than truth. The writers were- Jews.

"Thousands of details that I had scarcely noticed before seemed
to me now to deserve attention. I began to grasp and understand
things which I had formerly looked at in a different light."

"Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
secured. This was the Press. The Jew exercised all his skill and
tenacity in getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began
gradually to control public life in its entirety."


http://www.radioaryan.com https://redice.tv

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Loading...