Discussion:
God save our free marketeer demi-gods!
(too old to reply)
Ördög
2018-07-17 00:37:14 UTC
Permalink
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?

*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*

<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>

"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.

The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.

But that’s not all.

-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.

-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
--
Rest assured I am not going anywhere
MattB
2018-07-17 02:47:07 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
2018-07-17 04:36:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income disparities like this should be regulated by government.
MattB
2018-07-17 07:40:02 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:36:35 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when I'm
not allowed to make a profit?
Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
2018-07-19 02:32:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:36:35 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when I'm
not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$ on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
MattB
2018-07-19 20:10:17 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:32:23 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:36:35 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when I'm
not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$ on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?

What country is this done in?
Petzl
2018-07-19 22:09:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:32:23 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:36:35 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when I'm
not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$ on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
--
Petzl
Good lawyers know the law
Great lawyers know the judge
MattB
2018-07-19 23:21:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:32:23 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:36:35 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when I'm
not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$ on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question

What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.

Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba, Laos
and Vietnam. Venezuela has a socialist government at this time and
the socialist are trying to become pure tyrants.
de chucka
2018-07-19 23:31:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:32:23 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:36:35 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when I'm
not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$ on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba, Laos
and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Post by MattB
Venezuela has a socialist government at this time and
the socialist are trying to become pure tyrants.
MattB
2018-07-19 23:57:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:32:23 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:36:35 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when I'm
not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$ on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba, Laos
and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.

Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Venezuela has a socialist government at this time and
the socialist are trying to become pure tyrants.
de chucka
2018-07-19 23:58:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:32:23 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:36:35 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when I'm
not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$ on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba, Laos
and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
Ördög
2018-07-20 01:10:01 UTC
Permalink
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.

As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
--
Ördög, without any apologies
MattB
2018-07-20 06:23:09 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:10:01 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.
So having a opinion that does not support your socialist agenda makes
one a "septic troll"? That alone shows what you stand for in truth.
You want to bring back the Lenin and Stalin purges?
Post by Ördög
As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
There is always abuse it is a constant battle to prevent it. Look to
the socialist States and see the abuses there such as China and North
Korea. Look at Venezuela to see the dangers of a socialist
government.
de chucka
2018-07-20 10:04:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:10:01 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.
So having a opinion that does not support your socialist agenda makes
one a "septic troll"? That alone shows what you stand for in truth.
You want to bring back the Lenin and Stalin purges?
Post by Ördög
As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
There is always abuse it is a constant battle to prevent it. Look to
the socialist States and see the abuses there such as China and North
Korea. Look at Venezuela to see the dangers of a socialist
government.
Of course you could see the the socialist countries of Scandinavia or
Australia and see what better countries they are then the US
MattB
2018-07-20 18:43:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:10:01 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on
average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.
So having a opinion that does not support your socialist agenda makes
one a "septic troll"? That alone shows what you stand for in truth.
You want to bring back the Lenin and Stalin purges?
Post by Ördög
As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
There is always abuse it is a constant battle to prevent it. Look to
the socialist States and see the abuses there such as China and North
Korea. Look at Venezuela to see the dangers of a socialist
government.
Of course you could see the the socialist countries of Scandinavia or
Australia and see what better countries they are then the US
Australia isn't a socialist country been there people outside of
Sydney are very capitalist. Sydney has the look and feel of East
Chicago.

Australia is a liberal democracy and that isn't pure socialist. It is
actually a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy (looked it
up). Although you do not have a bill of rights believe if you tried
to impose Ordogs brand of government there you'd have problems.

They are not better than the USA but are much much smaller so have
less problems. Several of the States have higher populations than
your entire country and much more land.
de chucka
2018-07-20 20:33:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:10:01 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on
average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.
So having a opinion that does not support your socialist agenda makes
one a "septic troll"? That alone shows what you stand for in truth.
You want to bring back the Lenin and Stalin purges?
Post by Ördög
As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
There is always abuse it is a constant battle to prevent it. Look to
the socialist States and see the abuses there such as China and North
Korea. Look at Venezuela to see the dangers of a socialist
government.
Of course you could see the the socialist countries of Scandinavia or
Australia and see what better countries they are then the US
Australia isn't a socialist country been there people outside of
Sydney are very capitalist. Sydney has the look and feel of East
Chicago.
There is no such thing as a pure socialist country there are just degrees
Post by MattB
Australia is a liberal democracy and that isn't pure socialist. It is
actually a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy (looked it
up). Although you do not have a bill of rights believe if you tried
to impose Ordogs brand of government there you'd have problems.
They are not better than the USA but are much much smaller so have
less problems.
Certainly are

Several of the States have higher populations than
Post by MattB
your entire country and much more land.
MattB
2018-07-20 22:17:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:10:01 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on
average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.
So having a opinion that does not support your socialist agenda makes
one a "septic troll"? That alone shows what you stand for in truth.
You want to bring back the Lenin and Stalin purges?
Post by Ördög
As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
There is always abuse it is a constant battle to prevent it. Look to
the socialist States and see the abuses there such as China and North
Korea. Look at Venezuela to see the dangers of a socialist
government.
Of course you could see the the socialist countries of Scandinavia or
Australia and see what better countries they are then the US
Australia isn't a socialist country been there people outside of
Sydney are very capitalist. Sydney has the look and feel of East
Chicago.
There is no such thing as a pure socialist country there are just degrees
True and yet you called Australia a socialist country. Like the USA
it is a mix.
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Australia is a liberal democracy and that isn't pure socialist. It is
actually a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy (looked it
up). Although you do not have a bill of rights believe if you tried
to impose Ordogs brand of government there you'd have problems.
They are not better than the USA but are much much smaller so have
less problems.
Certainly are
I hope it stays that way. Seems you are having problems now.
Post by de chucka
Several of the States have higher populations than
Post by MattB
your entire country and much more land.
de chucka
2018-07-20 23:14:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:10:01 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on
average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.
So having a opinion that does not support your socialist agenda makes
one a "septic troll"? That alone shows what you stand for in truth.
You want to bring back the Lenin and Stalin purges?
Post by Ördög
As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
There is always abuse it is a constant battle to prevent it. Look to
the socialist States and see the abuses there such as China and North
Korea. Look at Venezuela to see the dangers of a socialist
government.
Of course you could see the the socialist countries of Scandinavia or
Australia and see what better countries they are then the US
Australia isn't a socialist country been there people outside of
Sydney are very capitalist. Sydney has the look and feel of East
Chicago.
There is no such thing as a pure socialist country there are just degrees
True and yet you called Australia a socialist country. Like the USA
it is a mix.
It is a much more socialist country then the USA but of course it all
depends on what form of socialism one is discussing. I see myself a a
socialist democrat
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Australia is a liberal democracy and that isn't pure socialist. It is
actually a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy (looked it
up). Although you do not have a bill of rights believe if you tried
to impose Ordogs brand of government there you'd have problems.
They are not better than the USA but are much much smaller so have
less problems.
Certainly are
I hope it stays that way. Seems you are having problems now.
Things are going Ok, decent medical system and support is OK for the
less fortunate
MattB
2018-07-21 03:01:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:10:01 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on
average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.
So having a opinion that does not support your socialist agenda makes
one a "septic troll"? That alone shows what you stand for in truth.
You want to bring back the Lenin and Stalin purges?
Post by Ördög
As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
There is always abuse it is a constant battle to prevent it. Look to
the socialist States and see the abuses there such as China and North
Korea. Look at Venezuela to see the dangers of a socialist
government.
Of course you could see the the socialist countries of Scandinavia or
Australia and see what better countries they are then the US
Australia isn't a socialist country been there people outside of
Sydney are very capitalist. Sydney has the look and feel of East
Chicago.
There is no such thing as a pure socialist country there are just degrees
True and yet you called Australia a socialist country. Like the USA
it is a mix.
It is a much more socialist country then the USA but of course it all
depends on what form of socialism one is discussing.
Your country doesn't have a bill of rights to protect the people and
property so can become more socialist easily. Yet like so many things
if it isn't pure Capitalism, it is socialist type thinking things like
things for the general welfare of the people are socialist, fire
departments, medical care and such. Conservatives believe in such
things as well. As to most who are center right.
Post by de chucka
I see myself a a socialist democrat
Can't say much as I found out with the word liberals terminology might
mean something different there.


Here is in part some of the 1956 Republican platform

Provide federal assistance to low-income communities
Protect Social Security
Provide asylum for refugees
Extend minimum wage

Improve unemployment benefit system so it covers more people
Strengthen labor laws so workers can more easily join a union
Assure equal pay for equal work regardless of sex

So conservative values do indeed coincide with Democrats in some ways.
Both parties have been going downhill for decades. IMO.
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Australia is a liberal democracy and that isn't pure socialist. It is
actually a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy (looked it
up). Although you do not have a bill of rights believe if you tried
to impose Ordogs brand of government there you'd have problems.
They are not better than the USA but are much much smaller so have
less problems.
Certainly are
I hope it stays that way. Seems you are having problems now.
Things are going Ok, decent medical system and support is OK for the
less fortunate
Our medical system is good for the less fortunate in most states in
fact better than what many in the middle class have. Obama care is
great for those on Medicaid, but sucks for the rest with the co-pays
and deductibles. Those with good company insurance have limited to
no co-pays and deductibles.

Does the government pay all your medical bills there? Canada has a
better than average system but you could die before you see a doctor
there. Our congress democrat and Republican are firmly under the
control of the medical industry. Obama was as well and Trump if you
watch all he does is for the super rich only.
de chucka
2018-07-21 04:37:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:10:01 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on
average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.
So having a opinion that does not support your socialist agenda makes
one a "septic troll"? That alone shows what you stand for in truth.
You want to bring back the Lenin and Stalin purges?
Post by Ördög
As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
There is always abuse it is a constant battle to prevent it. Look to
the socialist States and see the abuses there such as China and North
Korea. Look at Venezuela to see the dangers of a socialist
government.
Of course you could see the the socialist countries of Scandinavia or
Australia and see what better countries they are then the US
Australia isn't a socialist country been there people outside of
Sydney are very capitalist. Sydney has the look and feel of East
Chicago.
There is no such thing as a pure socialist country there are just degrees
True and yet you called Australia a socialist country. Like the USA
it is a mix.
It is a much more socialist country then the USA but of course it all
depends on what form of socialism one is discussing.
Your country doesn't have a bill of rights to protect the people and
property so can become more socialist easily.
No we have a Constitution
Yet like so many things
Post by MattB
if it isn't pure Capitalism, it is socialist type thinking things like
things for the general welfare of the people are socialist, fire
departments, medical care and such. Conservatives believe in such
things as well. As to most who are center right.
So the US is a socialist country
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
I see myself a a socialist democrat
Can't say much as I found out with the word liberals terminology might
mean something different there.
Here is in part some of the 1956 Republican platform
Provide federal assistance to low-income communities
Protect Social Security
Provide asylum for refugees
Extend minimum wage
Improve unemployment benefit system so it covers more people
Strengthen labor laws so workers can more easily join a union
Assure equal pay for equal work regardless of sex
So conservative values do indeed coincide with Democrats in some ways.
Both parties have been going downhill for decades. IMO.
Can't say I overly care
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Australia is a liberal democracy and that isn't pure socialist. It is
actually a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy (looked it
up). Although you do not have a bill of rights believe if you tried
to impose Ordogs brand of government there you'd have problems.
They are not better than the USA but are much much smaller so have
less problems.
Certainly are
I hope it stays that way. Seems you are having problems now.
Things are going Ok, decent medical system and support is OK for the
less fortunate
Our medical system is good for the less fortunate in most states in
fact better than what many in the middle class have. Obama care is
great for those on Medicaid, but sucks for the rest with the co-pays
and deductibles. Those with good company insurance have limited to
no co-pays and deductibles.
Medical care is the single biggest cause of personal bankruptcy in the US
Post by MattB
Does the government pay all your medical bills there? Canada has a
better than average system but you could die before you see a doctor
there. Our congress democrat and Republican are firmly under the
control of the medical industry. Obama was as well and Trump if you
watch all he does is for the super rich only.
Petzl
2018-07-21 05:34:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:10:01 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on
average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.
So having a opinion that does not support your socialist agenda makes
one a "septic troll"? That alone shows what you stand for in truth.
You want to bring back the Lenin and Stalin purges?
Post by Ördög
As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
There is always abuse it is a constant battle to prevent it. Look to
the socialist States and see the abuses there such as China and North
Korea. Look at Venezuela to see the dangers of a socialist
government.
Of course you could see the the socialist countries of Scandinavia or
Australia and see what better countries they are then the US
Australia isn't a socialist country been there people outside of
Sydney are very capitalist. Sydney has the look and feel of East
Chicago.
There is no such thing as a pure socialist country there are just degrees
True and yet you called Australia a socialist country. Like the USA
it is a mix.
It is a much more socialist country then the USA but of course it all
depends on what form of socialism one is discussing.
Your country doesn't have a bill of rights to protect the people and
property so can become more socialist easily.
No we have a Constitution
Yet like so many things
Post by MattB
if it isn't pure Capitalism, it is socialist type thinking things like
things for the general welfare of the people are socialist, fire
departments, medical care and such. Conservatives believe in such
things as well. As to most who are center right.
So the US is a socialist country
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
I see myself a a socialist democrat
Can't say much as I found out with the word liberals terminology might
mean something different there.
Here is in part some of the 1956 Republican platform
Provide federal assistance to low-income communities
Protect Social Security
Provide asylum for refugees
Extend minimum wage
Improve unemployment benefit system so it covers more people
Strengthen labor laws so workers can more easily join a union
Assure equal pay for equal work regardless of sex
So conservative values do indeed coincide with Democrats in some ways.
Both parties have been going downhill for decades. IMO.
Can't say I overly care
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Australia is a liberal democracy and that isn't pure socialist. It is
actually a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy (looked it
up). Although you do not have a bill of rights believe if you tried
to impose Ordogs brand of government there you'd have problems.
They are not better than the USA but are much much smaller so have
less problems.
Certainly are
I hope it stays that way. Seems you are having problems now.
Things are going Ok, decent medical system and support is OK for the
less fortunate
Our medical system is good for the less fortunate in most states in
fact better than what many in the middle class have. Obama care is
great for those on Medicaid, but sucks for the rest with the co-pays
and deductibles. Those with good company insurance have limited to
no co-pays and deductibles.
Medical care is the single biggest cause of personal bankruptcy in the US
A number of my Anerican Canadian friends are in Australia because they
cannot aford North American medical care for thier partner. Refugees
if you like.
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Does the government pay all your medical bills there? Canada has a
better than average system but you could die before you see a doctor
there. Our congress democrat and Republican are firmly under the
control of the medical industry. Obama was as well and Trump if you
watch all he does is for the super rich only.
--
Petzl
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions,
the judiciary must apply the law!
Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australian Constitution was finally adopted and on behalf of future generations,
‘Our Australian Commonwealth from its first stage will be a Christian Commonwealth’.
MattB
2018-07-21 06:22:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:10:01 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on
average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.
So having a opinion that does not support your socialist agenda makes
one a "septic troll"? That alone shows what you stand for in truth.
You want to bring back the Lenin and Stalin purges?
Post by Ördög
As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
There is always abuse it is a constant battle to prevent it. Look to
the socialist States and see the abuses there such as China and North
Korea. Look at Venezuela to see the dangers of a socialist
government.
Of course you could see the the socialist countries of Scandinavia or
Australia and see what better countries they are then the US
Australia isn't a socialist country been there people outside of
Sydney are very capitalist. Sydney has the look and feel of East
Chicago.
There is no such thing as a pure socialist country there are just degrees
True and yet you called Australia a socialist country. Like the USA
it is a mix.
It is a much more socialist country then the USA but of course it all
depends on what form of socialism one is discussing.
Your country doesn't have a bill of rights to protect the people and
property so can become more socialist easily.
No we have a Constitution
Yet like so many things
Post by MattB
if it isn't pure Capitalism, it is socialist type thinking things like
things for the general welfare of the people are socialist, fire
departments, medical care and such. Conservatives believe in such
things as well. As to most who are center right.
So the US is a socialist country
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
I see myself a a socialist democrat
Can't say much as I found out with the word liberals terminology might
mean something different there.
Here is in part some of the 1956 Republican platform
Provide federal assistance to low-income communities
Protect Social Security
Provide asylum for refugees
Extend minimum wage
Improve unemployment benefit system so it covers more people
Strengthen labor laws so workers can more easily join a union
Assure equal pay for equal work regardless of sex
So conservative values do indeed coincide with Democrats in some ways.
Both parties have been going downhill for decades. IMO.
Can't say I overly care
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Australia is a liberal democracy and that isn't pure socialist. It is
actually a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy (looked it
up). Although you do not have a bill of rights believe if you tried
to impose Ordogs brand of government there you'd have problems.
They are not better than the USA but are much much smaller so have
less problems.
Certainly are
I hope it stays that way. Seems you are having problems now.
Things are going Ok, decent medical system and support is OK for the
less fortunate
Our medical system is good for the less fortunate in most states in
fact better than what many in the middle class have. Obama care is
great for those on Medicaid, but sucks for the rest with the co-pays
and deductibles. Those with good company insurance have limited to
no co-pays and deductibles.
Medical care is the single biggest cause of personal bankruptcy in the US
A number of my Anerican Canadian friends are in Australia because they
cannot aford North American medical care for thier partner. Refugees
if you like.
I have Canadian friends live right near the border and their biggest
gripe is getting any care it takes forever to get a appointment.
Post by Petzl
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Does the government pay all your medical bills there? Canada has a
better than average system but you could die before you see a doctor
there. Our congress democrat and Republican are firmly under the
control of the medical industry. Obama was as well and Trump if you
watch all he does is for the super rich only.
MattB
2018-07-21 06:20:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:10:01 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on
average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.
So having a opinion that does not support your socialist agenda makes
one a "septic troll"? That alone shows what you stand for in truth.
You want to bring back the Lenin and Stalin purges?
Post by Ördög
As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
There is always abuse it is a constant battle to prevent it. Look to
the socialist States and see the abuses there such as China and North
Korea. Look at Venezuela to see the dangers of a socialist
government.
Of course you could see the the socialist countries of Scandinavia or
Australia and see what better countries they are then the US
Australia isn't a socialist country been there people outside of
Sydney are very capitalist. Sydney has the look and feel of East
Chicago.
There is no such thing as a pure socialist country there are just degrees
True and yet you called Australia a socialist country. Like the USA
it is a mix.
It is a much more socialist country then the USA but of course it all
depends on what form of socialism one is discussing.
Your country doesn't have a bill of rights to protect the people and
property so can become more socialist easily.
No we have a Constitution
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
Post by de chucka
Yet like so many things
????
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
if it isn't pure Capitalism, it is socialist type thinking things like
things for the general welfare of the people are socialist, fire
departments, medical care and such. Conservatives believe in such
things as well. As to most who are center right.
So the US is a socialist country
No it is a mix of the two capitalism and Socialist principles as is
Australia. The problem is using the best of each. A pure Capitalist
or pure socialist society would truly suck IMO.

Communism does suck.
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
I see myself a a socialist democrat
Can't say much as I found out with the word liberals terminology might
mean something different there.
Here is in part some of the 1956 Republican platform
Provide federal assistance to low-income communities
Protect Social Security
Provide asylum for refugees
Extend minimum wage
Improve unemployment benefit system so it covers more people
Strengthen labor laws so workers can more easily join a union
Assure equal pay for equal work regardless of sex
So conservative values do indeed coincide with Democrats in some ways.
Both parties have been going downhill for decades. IMO.
Can't say I overly care
Yet you care enough to call Americans "Septic"? You focus on the
negative and forget the positive and all societies have some of both
even Australia ask it's original people.
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Australia is a liberal democracy and that isn't pure socialist. It is
actually a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy (looked it
up). Although you do not have a bill of rights believe if you tried
to impose Ordogs brand of government there you'd have problems.
They are not better than the USA but are much much smaller so have
less problems.
Certainly are
I hope it stays that way. Seems you are having problems now.
Things are going Ok, decent medical system and support is OK for the
less fortunate
Our medical system is good for the less fortunate in most states in
fact better than what many in the middle class have. Obama care is
great for those on Medicaid, but sucks for the rest with the co-pays
and deductibles. Those with good company insurance have limited to
no co-pays and deductibles.
Medical care is the single biggest cause of personal bankruptcy in the US
Maybe. Yet how would you fix it. I think single payer is the only
way.
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Does the government pay all your medical bills there? Canada has a
better than average system but you could die before you see a doctor
there. Our congress democrat and Republican are firmly under the
control of the medical industry. Obama was as well and Trump if you
watch all he does is for the super rich only.
de chucka
2018-07-21 09:56:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:10:01 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on
average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.
So having a opinion that does not support your socialist agenda makes
one a "septic troll"? That alone shows what you stand for in truth.
You want to bring back the Lenin and Stalin purges?
Post by Ördög
As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
There is always abuse it is a constant battle to prevent it. Look to
the socialist States and see the abuses there such as China and North
Korea. Look at Venezuela to see the dangers of a socialist
government.
Of course you could see the the socialist countries of Scandinavia or
Australia and see what better countries they are then the US
Australia isn't a socialist country been there people outside of
Sydney are very capitalist. Sydney has the look and feel of East
Chicago.
There is no such thing as a pure socialist country there are just degrees
True and yet you called Australia a socialist country. Like the USA
it is a mix.
It is a much more socialist country then the USA but of course it all
depends on what form of socialism one is discussing.
Your country doesn't have a bill of rights to protect the people and
property so can become more socialist easily.
No we have a Constitution
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Yet like so many things
????
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
if it isn't pure Capitalism, it is socialist type thinking things like
things for the general welfare of the people are socialist, fire
departments, medical care and such. Conservatives believe in such
things as well. As to most who are center right.
So the US is a socialist country
No it is a mix of the two capitalism and Socialist principles as is
Australia. The problem is using the best of each. A pure Capitalist
or pure socialist society would truly suck IMO.
Communism does suck.
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
I see myself a a socialist democrat
Can't say much as I found out with the word liberals terminology might
mean something different there.
Here is in part some of the 1956 Republican platform
Provide federal assistance to low-income communities
Protect Social Security
Provide asylum for refugees
Extend minimum wage
Improve unemployment benefit system so it covers more people
Strengthen labor laws so workers can more easily join a union
Assure equal pay for equal work regardless of sex
So conservative values do indeed coincide with Democrats in some ways.
Both parties have been going downhill for decades. IMO.
Can't say I overly care
Yet you care enough to call Americans "Septic"?
What has that got to do with your political parties?

You focus on the
Post by MattB
negative and forget the positive and all societies have some of both
even Australia ask it's original people.
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Australia is a liberal democracy and that isn't pure socialist. It is
actually a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy (looked it
up). Although you do not have a bill of rights believe if you tried
to impose Ordogs brand of government there you'd have problems.
They are not better than the USA but are much much smaller so have
less problems.
Certainly are
I hope it stays that way. Seems you are having problems now.
Things are going Ok, decent medical system and support is OK for the
less fortunate
Our medical system is good for the less fortunate in most states in
fact better than what many in the middle class have. Obama care is
great for those on Medicaid, but sucks for the rest with the co-pays
and deductibles. Those with good company insurance have limited to
no co-pays and deductibles.
Medical care is the single biggest cause of personal bankruptcy in the US
Maybe. Yet how would you fix it.
Have a free system
I think single payer is the only
Post by MattB
way.
MattB
2018-07-21 20:48:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:10:01 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
MattB the septic troll
dechucka
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Petz
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Foul screaming nutbag
MattB the septic troll
Post by MattB
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class
can spare, or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-
average-australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75
million — or 78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris,
who has examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s
100 biggest public companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on
average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical
workers’ earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income
disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when
I'm not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$
on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-
news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba,
Laos and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
A very nice move of the goal posts by this undesirable septic troll.
So having a opinion that does not support your socialist agenda makes
one a "septic troll"? That alone shows what you stand for in truth.
You want to bring back the Lenin and Stalin purges?
Post by Ördög
As far as I was concerned in the OP I was pointing out some quite
undesirable and to some degree within the existing political system
remediable excesses of neo-liberal greed and disregard for the good of
society (and obviously the organisations themselves within which these
greedy social leeches operate).
There is always abuse it is a constant battle to prevent it. Look to
the socialist States and see the abuses there such as China and North
Korea. Look at Venezuela to see the dangers of a socialist
government.
Of course you could see the the socialist countries of Scandinavia or
Australia and see what better countries they are then the US
Australia isn't a socialist country been there people outside of
Sydney are very capitalist. Sydney has the look and feel of East
Chicago.
There is no such thing as a pure socialist country there are just degrees
True and yet you called Australia a socialist country. Like the USA
it is a mix.
It is a much more socialist country then the USA but of course it all
depends on what form of socialism one is discussing.
Your country doesn't have a bill of rights to protect the people and
property so can become more socialist easily.
No we have a Constitution
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?

Never read your Constitution.
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Yet like so many things
????
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
if it isn't pure Capitalism, it is socialist type thinking things like
things for the general welfare of the people are socialist, fire
departments, medical care and such. Conservatives believe in such
things as well. As to most who are center right.
So the US is a socialist country
No it is a mix of the two capitalism and Socialist principles as is
Australia. The problem is using the best of each. A pure Capitalist
or pure socialist society would truly suck IMO.
Communism does suck.
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
I see myself a a socialist democrat
Can't say much as I found out with the word liberals terminology might
mean something different there.
Here is in part some of the 1956 Republican platform
Provide federal assistance to low-income communities
Protect Social Security
Provide asylum for refugees
Extend minimum wage
Improve unemployment benefit system so it covers more people
Strengthen labor laws so workers can more easily join a union
Assure equal pay for equal work regardless of sex
So conservative values do indeed coincide with Democrats in some ways.
Both parties have been going downhill for decades. IMO.
Can't say I overly care
Yet you care enough to call Americans "Septic"?
What has that got to do with your political parties?
You focus on the
Post by MattB
negative and forget the positive and all societies have some of both
even Australia ask it's original people.
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Australia is a liberal democracy and that isn't pure socialist. It is
actually a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy (looked it
up). Although you do not have a bill of rights believe if you tried
to impose Ordogs brand of government there you'd have problems.
They are not better than the USA but are much much smaller so have
less problems.
Certainly are
I hope it stays that way. Seems you are having problems now.
Things are going Ok, decent medical system and support is OK for the
less fortunate
Our medical system is good for the less fortunate in most states in
fact better than what many in the middle class have. Obama care is
great for those on Medicaid, but sucks for the rest with the co-pays
and deductibles. Those with good company insurance have limited to
no co-pays and deductibles.
Medical care is the single biggest cause of personal bankruptcy in the US
Maybe. Yet how would you fix it.
Have a free system
I think single payer is the only
Post by MattB
way.
Petzl
2018-07-22 00:28:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
--
Petzl
If voting made any difference,
they wouldn't let us do it- Mark Twain
de chucka
2018-07-22 01:27:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
Petzl
2018-07-22 02:54:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
Why in the USA Jews were not allowed to vote till early1900's (20th
century) what changed. They were not allowed to vote in Australia
either!
--
Petzl
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions,
the judiciary must apply the law!
Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australian Constitution was finally adopted and on behalf of future generations,
‘Our Australian Commonwealth from its first stage will be a Christian Commonwealth’.
de chucka
2018-07-22 03:07:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
Why in the USA Jews were not allowed to vote till early1900's (20th
century) what changed.
Only true in some areas but the same applied to women, negroes, native
Americans, people without land, Catholics etc. Nothing to do with the US
constitution. Of course male Jews voted in our constitutional votes and
freely after Federation
They were not allowed to vote in Australia
Post by Petzl
either!
MattB
2018-07-22 06:02:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
Why in the USA Jews were not allowed to vote till early1900's (20th
century) what changed. They were not allowed to vote in Australia
either!
Can you cite that? Can find it for a few areas but not built that
way into the US Constitution.


Religious test
In several British North American colonies, before and after the 1776
Declaration of Independence, Jews, Quakers and/or Catholics were
excluded from the franchise and/or from running for elections.[20]

The Delaware Constitution of 1776 stated that "Every person who shall
be chosen a member of either house, or appointed to any office or
place of trust, before taking his seat, or entering upon the execution
of his office, shall (...) also make and subscribe the following
declaration, to wit: I, A B. do profess faith in God the Father, and
in Jesus Christ His only Son, and in the Holy Ghost, one God, blessed
for evermore; and I do acknowledge the holy scriptures of the Old and
New Testament to be given by divine inspiration.".[21] This was
repealed by Article I, Section II. of the 1792 Constitution: "No
religious test shall be required as a qualification to any office, or
public trust, under this State".[22] The 1778 Constitution of the
State of South Carolina stated, "No person shall be eligible to sit in
the house of representatives unless he be of the Protestant
religion",[23] the 1777 Constitution of the State of Georgia (art. VI)
that "The representatives shall be chosen out of the residents in each
county (...) and they shall be of the Protestant religion".[24]

With the growth in the number of Baptists in Virginia before the
Revolution, who challenged the established Anglican Church, the issues
of religious freedom became important to rising leaders such as James
Madison. As a young lawyer, he defended Baptist preachers who were not
licensed by (and were opposed by) the established state Anglican
Church. He carried developing ideas about religious freedom to be
incorporated into the constitutional convention of the United States.

In 1787, Article One of the United States Constitution stated that
"the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite
for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature".
More significantly, Article Six disavowed the religious test
requirements of several states, saying: "[N]o religious Test shall
ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust
under the United States."

But, in Maryland, Jewish Americans were excluded from State office
until the law requiring candidates to affirm a belief in an
afterlife[25] was repealed in 1828.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_rights_in_the_United_States
Fran
2018-07-23 06:14:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Why in the USA Jews were not allowed to vote till early1900's (20th
century) what changed.
Cite? Or are you confusing voting with the fact that Jews in some US
States were not allowed to stand for office?

They were not allowed to vote in Australia
Post by Petzl
either!
Which colony or settlement do you have in mind as being a place where
Jews weren't allowed to vote?
Petzl
2018-07-23 06:59:33 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:14:38 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
Why in the USA Jews were not allowed to vote till early1900's (20th
century) what changed.
Cite? Or are you confusing voting with the fact that Jews in some US
States were not allowed to stand for office?
They were not allowed to vote in Australia
Post by Petzl
either!
Which colony or settlement do you have in mind as being a place where
Jews weren't allowed to vote?
Do you own research Dechucker got it near right

USA late 1890's some states started allowing Jews to vote by 1920 all
states allowed it (does not mean it complies with US constitution)

Australia after 1901 Jews were not allowed not sure about Catholics,
never put to the test, Federation never happened,

The Governor General, Lord Hopetoun (no constitutional recognition of
a PM) was to appoint 7 executive ministers to to lead the interim
government, This upset the colonial political parties (also no
recognition of parties).

From this point on there was no need to implement federation and it's
been illegal ever since. The Governor General is the person who should
be running Parliament (similar to the USA President).
--
Petzl
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions,
the judiciary must apply the law!
Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australian Constitution was finally adopted and on behalf of future generations,
‘Our Australian Commonwealth from its first stage will be a Christian Commonwealth’.
de chucka
2018-07-23 07:06:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:14:38 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
Why in the USA Jews were not allowed to vote till early1900's (20th
century) what changed.
Cite? Or are you confusing voting with the fact that Jews in some US
States were not allowed to stand for office?
They were not allowed to vote in Australia
Post by Petzl
either!
Which colony or settlement do you have in mind as being a place where
Jews weren't allowed to vote?
Do you own research Dechucker got it near right
USA late 1890's some states started allowing Jews to vote by 1920 all
states allowed it (does not mean it complies with US constitution)
6A and 14A meant there could be no religious test n the US for voting
from 1868
Post by Petzl
Australia after 1901 Jews were not allowed not sure about Catholics,
Wrong on both counts. Since Federation there has not been a religious
test for voting
Post by Petzl
never put to the test, Federation never happened,
Seems it did
Post by Petzl
The Governor General, Lord Hopetoun (no constitutional recognition of
a PM) was to appoint 7 executive ministers to to lead the interim
government, This upset the colonial political parties (also no
recognition of parties).
He did
Post by Petzl
From this point on there was no need to implement federation and it's
been illegal ever since. The Governor General is the person who should
be running Parliament (similar to the USA President).
Wrong
Fran
2018-07-23 08:19:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:14:38 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
Why in the USA Jews were not allowed to vote till early1900's (20th
century) what changed.
Cite? Or are you confusing voting with the fact that Jews in some US
States were not allowed to stand for office?
They were not allowed to vote in Australia
Post by Petzl
either!
Which colony or settlement do you have in mind as being a place where
Jews weren't allowed to vote?
Do you own research Dechucker got it near right
I have. That is why I was asking you to give a cite to support your
claim. You so often get mixed up and don't understand what you read and
I'm sure this is yet another instance of you ggetting ti wrong.
Post by Petzl
USA late 1890's some states started allowing Jews to vote by 1920 all
states allowed it (does not mean it complies with US constitution)
So which States in the USA do you claim did not allow Jews to vote until
the 1920s?
Post by Petzl
Australia after 1901 Jews were not allowed not sure about Catholics,
never put to the test, Federation never happened,
Bullshit.
SG1
2018-07-23 09:40:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:14:38 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
Why in the USA Jews were not allowed to vote till early1900's (20th
century) what changed.
Cite? Or are you confusing voting with the fact that Jews in some US
States were not allowed to stand for office?
They were not allowed to vote in Australia
Post by Petzl
either!
Which colony or settlement do you have in mind as being a place where
Jews weren't allowed to vote?
Do you own research Dechucker got it near right
I have. That is why I was asking you to give a cite to support your
claim. You so often get mixed up and don't understand what you read and
I'm sure this is yet another instance of you ggetting ti wrong.
Post by Petzl
USA late 1890's some states started allowing Jews to vote by 1920 all
states allowed it (does not mean it complies with US constitution)
So which States in the USA do you claim did not allow Jews to vote until
the 1920s?
Post by Petzl
Australia after 1901 Jews were not allowed not sure about Catholics,
never put to the test, Federation never happened,
Bullshit.
Good to have you back Fran and with a command of the English language.
hehehe
Fran
2018-07-23 12:57:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by SG1
Post by Fran
Bullshit.
Good to have you back Fran and with a command of the English language.
hehehe
LOL Been south for the past week to go to the Bendigo Sheep Show. I
did see a sheep in the distance and I didn't buy too much this year, if
I don't count the loom....
SG1
2018-07-23 22:07:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by SG1
Post by Fran
Bullshit.
Good to have you back Fran and with a command of the English language.
hehehe
LOL Been south for the past week to go to the Bendigo Sheep Show. I did
see a sheep in the distance and I didn't buy too much this year, if I
don't count the loom....
More weaving looming in your future!!! Ah now you have to deal with those be
weft of their senses. Don't
let it warp you...
de chucka
2018-07-23 22:40:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by SG1
Post by SG1
Post by Fran
Bullshit.
Good to have you back Fran and with a command of the English
language. hehehe
LOL  Been south for the past week to go to the Bendigo Sheep Show.  I
did see a sheep in the distance and I didn't buy too much this year,
if I don't count the loom....
More weaving looming in your future!!! Ah now you have to deal with
those be weft of their senses. Don't
let it warp you...
:-) very good although I had to look up what a 'weft' is
MattB
2018-07-23 22:39:32 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 22:57:56 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by SG1
Post by Fran
Bullshit.
Good to have you back Fran and with a command of the English language.
hehehe
LOL Been south for the past week to go to the Bendigo Sheep Show. I
did see a sheep in the distance and I didn't buy too much this year, if
I don't count the loom....
Do you sell what you make?
Petzl
2018-07-23 23:38:25 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 18:19:02 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:14:38 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
Why in the USA Jews were not allowed to vote till early1900's (20th
century) what changed.
Cite? Or are you confusing voting with the fact that Jews in some US
States were not allowed to stand for office?
They were not allowed to vote in Australia
Post by Petzl
either!
Which colony or settlement do you have in mind as being a place where
Jews weren't allowed to vote?
Do you own research Dechucker got it near right
I have. That is why I was asking you to give a cite to support your
claim. You so often get mixed up and don't understand what you read and
I'm sure this is yet another instance of you ggetting ti wrong.
Post by Petzl
USA late 1890's some states started allowing Jews to vote by 1920 all
states allowed it (does not mean it complies with US constitution)
So which States in the USA do you claim did not allow Jews to vote until
the 1920s?
Post by Petzl
Australia after 1901 Jews were not allowed not sure about Catholics,
never put to the test, Federation never happened,
Bullshit.
Thanks to your often quoted S116 the States decide what a religion is
today included, the offical and legal religion is only Anglican same
as it was during the colonies. Under the oaths act only Anglicans can
make a legal oath.
--
Petzl
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions,
the judiciary must apply the law!
Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australian Constitution was finally adopted and on behalf of future generations,
‘Our Australian Commonwealth from its first stage will be a Christian Commonwealth’.
de chucka
2018-07-23 23:45:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 18:19:02 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:14:38 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
Why in the USA Jews were not allowed to vote till early1900's (20th
century) what changed.
Cite? Or are you confusing voting with the fact that Jews in some US
States were not allowed to stand for office?
They were not allowed to vote in Australia
Post by Petzl
either!
Which colony or settlement do you have in mind as being a place where
Jews weren't allowed to vote?
Do you own research Dechucker got it near right
I have. That is why I was asking you to give a cite to support your
claim. You so often get mixed up and don't understand what you read and
I'm sure this is yet another instance of you ggetting ti wrong.
Post by Petzl
USA late 1890's some states started allowing Jews to vote by 1920 all
states allowed it (does not mean it complies with US constitution)
So which States in the USA do you claim did not allow Jews to vote until
the 1920s?
Post by Petzl
Australia after 1901 Jews were not allowed not sure about Catholics,
never put to the test, Federation never happened,
Bullshit.
Thanks to your often quoted S116 the States decide what a religion is
today included, the offical and legal religion is only Anglican same
as it was during the colonies. Under the oaths act only Anglicans can
make a legal oath.
What a load of crap but feel free to take it to the High Court
remembering of course Church of the New Faith v Commissioner for
Pay-Roll Tax (Vic)

MattB
2018-07-23 07:46:46 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:14:38 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
Why in the USA Jews were not allowed to vote till early1900's (20th
century) what changed.
Cite? Or are you confusing voting with the fact that Jews in some US
States were not allowed to stand for office?
There was that. I could find nowhere they were not allowed to vote.
Did voter registration forms even ask religion?
Post by Fran
They were not allowed to vote in Australia
Post by Petzl
either!
Which colony or settlement do you have in mind as being a place where
Jews weren't allowed to vote?
Fran
2018-07-23 08:20:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:14:38 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
Why in the USA Jews were not allowed to vote till early1900's (20th
century) what changed.
Cite? Or are you confusing voting with the fact that Jews in some US
States were not allowed to stand for office?
There was that. I could find nowhere they were not allowed to vote.
Did voter registration forms even ask religion?
Watch pretzel keep digging the hole he's started.
MattB
2018-07-23 22:16:48 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 18:20:58 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:14:38 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
Why in the USA Jews were not allowed to vote till early1900's (20th
century) what changed.
Cite? Or are you confusing voting with the fact that Jews in some US
States were not allowed to stand for office?
There was that. I could find nowhere they were not allowed to vote.
Did voter registration forms even ask religion?
Watch pretzel keep digging the hole he's started.
Everyone makes a mistake from time to time or misspeaks. You just
admit it, learn from it and move on.
MattB
2018-07-22 05:59:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
dolf
2018-07-22 06:07:33 UTC
Permalink
Blasphemy is what Barrack Obama does?

Let’s see:

1ST amendment about the Creator...

Doesn’t comply

He has as much legitimate belief in Almighty God as Adolf Hitler did and
the only difference is Americans don’t swear oaths to the furher although
there have been known to be tributes made in the forests on his birthday.
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Aussies call
Americans septic and yet they have you the average Aussie?”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “It has taken me only two phone calls
and five emails to set in motion that which would make OBAMACARE be
regarded as insignificant much like the person whom brought it into being.

THAT LOUD MOUTHED SILVER-TONGUED HOITY-TOITY JERK OF A LAWYER BARACK OBAMA
OUGHT TO KNOW WITH REGARDS TO HIS ABHORRENT OATH TAKING: “...Thou shalt not
take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him
guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus 20:7 (KJV)]

THAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS SOMETHING AS A LAW ABOUT WHAT GOD CONSIDERS OF
HIMSELF AND NOT JUST ANY MISCONCEPTION OF HIM WHICH WE AS VANITY HOLD TO BE
TRUE: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their *CREATOR* with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Let’s see:

1ST amendment about the Creator...

Doesn’t comply

2ND amendment about any “regulated militia”

Doesn’t comply

Fears the enemy within as your psychosis [which is] personified by
Homosexuals or Russians

Okay we have the picture."

YOUTUBE: "Stranger In Moscow (Michael Jackson)"

http://youtu.be/pEEMi2j6lYE

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0647 HOURS ON 22 JULY 2018: "AMERICAN
MAGGOTRY: (LORD OF THE FLIES): "Russians? What I have read you Aussies
have a problem with China. Me I ignore much of the liberal BS. Russia may
have put out false information they did not hack the voting machines and so
many liberals are so stupid they don't know the difference. Wait by
liberal I mean far left and socialist.

You still haven't told me what court had jurisdiction here, that you will
be using?

Come on you can do it."

DOLF @ 0900 HOURS ON 22 JULY 2018: "THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION FOR
STARTERS:

YOUTUBE: "Men in Black All Neuralizer Scenes"

http://youtu.be/cGZQqhaU4gA

By knowing that the ONTIC (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: "of that
which is") mathematical parameters which are prerequisite to that which is
physical, real, or factual to existence and are as A PRIORI entirely within
our domain of providence an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as trinomial mathematical
theoretical noumenon, we may thereby through NEURAL LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING
immediately have access to the minds of some 540,097,607 persons:

U Can't Touch This- 415,950,495 views
Who Is It - 20,867,266 views
Give In To Me - 66,462,353 views"
Stranger In Moscow - 36,817,493 views"

BARACK OBAMA IS WITHIN MY VIEW IN RELATION TO #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 AND
HIS VAIN OATHS TO THE CREATOR IS GUILTY OF A CRIME:

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>

#YOD {10 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#MEM {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU - CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH {23 CHROMOSOMES}

ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Petzl
2018-07-22 10:23:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God whose compound
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
--
Petzl
Our parliaments need to obey our Constitutions,
the judiciary must apply the law
"Dieu et mon droit" God is my legal right
de chucka
2018-07-22 20:06:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God
Which sects god?


whose compound
Post by Petzl
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
SG1
2018-07-22 21:57:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God
Which sects god?
With the pretzel's track record that would be Yoda.
Post by de chucka
whose compound
Post by Petzl
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
MattB
2018-07-22 21:29:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God whose compound
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
You must be Christian if you've ever written say 2018 on anything?

Anno Domini is basically a dating system. The American founders were
not mostly Christians as you claim but were either followed Deism or
were greatly influenced by it.
Petzl
2018-07-22 22:58:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God whose compound
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
You must be Christian if you've ever written say 2018 on anything?
Anno Domini is basically a dating system. The American founders were
not mostly Christians as you claim but were either followed Deism or
were greatly influenced by it.
Your rhetoric is pure BS you are a REAL septic
"head so full of shit you know nothing

Anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of
our Lord Jesus Christ".

even the "Dating System" is now removing washing traces of Christ with
BC and AD are now refered to by PC pointyheads as BCE and CE {Common
Era and Before Common Era}

The "The Treaty of Paris" 1783 which turned American Colonists into
Christian USA citizens starts
In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.

Ends
Done at Paris, this third day of September in the year of our Lord,
one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three.
D. HARTLEY (SEAL)
JOHN ADAMS (SEAL)
B. FRANKLIN (SEAL)
JOHN JAY (SEAL)
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
--
Petzl
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions,
the judiciary must apply the law!
Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australian Constitution was finally adopted and on behalf of future generations,
‘Our Australian Commonwealth from its first stage will be a Christian Commonwealth’.
de chucka
2018-07-22 23:03:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God whose compound
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
You must be Christian if you've ever written say 2018 on anything?
Anno Domini is basically a dating system. The American founders were
not mostly Christians as you claim but were either followed Deism or
were greatly influenced by it.
Your rhetoric is pure BS you are a REAL septic
"head so full of shit you know nothing
Anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of
our Lord Jesus Christ".
even the "Dating System" is now removing washing traces of Christ with
BC and AD are now refered to by PC pointyheads as BCE and CE {Common
Era and Before Common Era}
The "The Treaty of Paris" 1783 which turned American Colonists into
Christian USA citizens starts
No it doesn't. If it did what type, Catholic French type or CofE English
types or maybe Brethren or Quakers?
MattB
2018-07-22 23:36:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God whose compound
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
You must be Christian if you've ever written say 2018 on anything?
Anno Domini is basically a dating system. The American founders were
not mostly Christians as you claim but were either followed Deism or
were greatly influenced by it.
Your rhetoric is pure BS you are a REAL septic
"head so full of shit you know nothing
Now you sound like Fran or Ordog are you related. Maybe you are a
Dolf clone?
Post by Petzl
Anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of
our Lord Jesus Christ".
Yes and yet what I posted is correct.
Post by Petzl
even the "Dating System" is now removing washing traces of Christ with
BC and AD are now refered to by PC pointyheads as BCE and CE {Common
Era and Before Common Era}
Tell me what does AD stand for?
Post by Petzl
The "The Treaty of Paris" 1783 which turned American Colonists into
Christian USA citizens starts
In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.
Rather deceptive here aren't you' The treaty starts

"In the Name of the most Holy & undivided Trinity.

It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the Hearts of the
most Serene and most Potent Prince George the Third, by the Grace of
God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the
Faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, Arch- Treasurer and Prince
Elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc.. and of the United States of
America"
Post by Petzl
Ends
Done at Paris, this third day of September in the year of our Lord,
one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three.
D. HARTLEY (SEAL)
JOHN ADAMS (SEAL)
B. FRANKLIN (SEAL)
JOHN JAY (SEAL)
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
Well if this is all you have guess you lost.

Our Constitution has a strict standard for separation of Church and
State. Does the Australian Constitution?

You a militant atheist? They are just as bad as a fundamentalist
Christian or Muslim.
Petzl
2018-07-23 01:51:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God whose compound
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
You must be Christian if you've ever written say 2018 on anything?
Anno Domini is basically a dating system. The American founders were
not mostly Christians as you claim but were either followed Deism or
were greatly influenced by it.
Your rhetoric is pure BS you are a REAL septic
"head so full of shit you know nothing
Now you sound like Fran or Ordog are you related. Maybe you are a
Dolf clone?
Post by Petzl
Anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of
our Lord Jesus Christ".
Yes and yet what I posted is correct.
Post by Petzl
even the "Dating System" is now removing washing traces of Christ with
BC and AD are now refered to by PC pointyheads as BCE and CE {Common
Era and Before Common Era}
Tell me what does AD stand for?
Post by Petzl
The "The Treaty of Paris" 1783 which turned American Colonists into
Christian USA citizens starts
In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.
Rather deceptive here aren't you' The treaty starts
"In the Name of the most Holy & undivided Trinity.
It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the Hearts of the
most Serene and most Potent Prince George the Third, by the Grace of
God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the
Faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, Arch- Treasurer and Prince
Elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc.. and of the United States of
America"
Post by Petzl
Ends
Done at Paris, this third day of September in the year of our Lord,
one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three.
D. HARTLEY (SEAL)
JOHN ADAMS (SEAL)
B. FRANKLIN (SEAL)
JOHN JAY (SEAL)
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
Well if this is all you have guess you lost.
Our Constitution has a strict standard for separation of Church and
State. Does the Australian Constitution?
You a militant atheist? They are just as bad as a fundamentalist
Christian or Muslim.
Hope you don't believe your rhetoric. Separation of Church and state
cane about because after Anglicanism (run by British Loyalists) came
the States running their own churchs.

You need to do your own reasearch not the bull some Jews have worked
into PC America
--
Petzl
The Donald succeeding as president in face of Left media Trump Derangement Syndrome.
These people need help!
The lefties are all there trying to pile their crap on Trump saying he's no good.
Here's a bloke who has made a fortune in the toughest property market in the world, Manhattan.
He was top rating with his apprentice show, in the toughest TV market in the world the United States.
He beat all those Governors, Senators and sons of Presidents in the presidents primaries
for the Republican party, then he beat the revered Clinton machine.
He has raised a beautiful family, his children are a wonderful tribute to him,
"they all" say he is a hopeless failure?
On top of that he's married to Miss World.
So what have you got to do in life,
what have you got to do by these rotten miserable mongrels
in "our" media on the left, what have you got to do?

The Clinton and Bush era of the last 30 years is about to come
to an end in light of the sudden Saudi Arabian purge of Clinton
and Bush allies.
de chucka
2018-07-23 02:18:17 UTC
Permalink
snip
Post by Petzl
You need to do your own reasearch not the bull some Jews have worked
into PC Americ
Are you a Jew as well pez? You know as much about the US constitution as
you do about the Aus one. 2/3rds of 3/5s 0f fuck all.
MattB
2018-07-23 03:23:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
snip
Post by Petzl
You need to do your own reasearch not the bull some Jews have worked
into PC Americ
Are you a Jew as well pez? You know as much about the US constitution as
you do about the Aus one. 2/3rds of 3/5s 0f fuck all.
Well hope you can figure out what he is talking about.
de chucka
2018-07-23 03:39:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
snip
Post by Petzl
You need to do your own reasearch not the bull some Jews have worked
into PC Americ
Are you a Jew as well pez? You know as much about the US constitution as
you do about the Aus one. 2/3rds of 3/5s 0f fuck all.
Well hope you can figure out what he is talking about.
Yep, his BS is at least logical
MattB
2018-07-23 03:43:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
snip
Post by Petzl
You need to do your own reasearch not the bull some Jews have worked
into PC Americ
Are you a Jew as well pez? You know as much about the US constitution as
you do about the Aus one. 2/3rds of 3/5s 0f fuck all.
Well hope you can figure out what he is talking about.
Yep, his BS is at least logical
Only to a average Aussie such as Dolf. To a Aussie seems facts don't
matter just rhetoric and how much BS they can spread.
MattB
2018-07-23 03:23:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God whose compound
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
You must be Christian if you've ever written say 2018 on anything?
Anno Domini is basically a dating system. The American founders were
not mostly Christians as you claim but were either followed Deism or
were greatly influenced by it.
Your rhetoric is pure BS you are a REAL septic
"head so full of shit you know nothing
Now you sound like Fran or Ordog are you related. Maybe you are a
Dolf clone?
Post by Petzl
Anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of
our Lord Jesus Christ".
Yes and yet what I posted is correct.
Post by Petzl
even the "Dating System" is now removing washing traces of Christ with
BC and AD are now refered to by PC pointyheads as BCE and CE {Common
Era and Before Common Era}
Tell me what does AD stand for?
Post by Petzl
The "The Treaty of Paris" 1783 which turned American Colonists into
Christian USA citizens starts
In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.
Rather deceptive here aren't you' The treaty starts
"In the Name of the most Holy & undivided Trinity.
It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the Hearts of the
most Serene and most Potent Prince George the Third, by the Grace of
God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the
Faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, Arch- Treasurer and Prince
Elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc.. and of the United States of
America"
Post by Petzl
Ends
Done at Paris, this third day of September in the year of our Lord,
one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three.
D. HARTLEY (SEAL)
JOHN ADAMS (SEAL)
B. FRANKLIN (SEAL)
JOHN JAY (SEAL)
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
Well if this is all you have guess you lost.
Our Constitution has a strict standard for separation of Church and
State. Does the Australian Constitution?
You a militant atheist? They are just as bad as a fundamentalist
Christian or Muslim.
Hope you don't believe your rhetoric. Separation of Church and state
cane about because after Anglicanism (run by British Loyalists) came
the States running their own churchs.
Did they and how does that violate separation of Church and State?
Post by Petzl
You need to do your own reasearch not the bull some Jews have worked
into PC America
What have Jews to do with this. To the best of my knowledge there
were no Jews among the US's founding fathers.

Can you provide a cite if you have evidence there was?
Petzl
2018-07-23 03:43:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God whose compound
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
You must be Christian if you've ever written say 2018 on anything?
Anno Domini is basically a dating system. The American founders were
not mostly Christians as you claim but were either followed Deism or
were greatly influenced by it.
Your rhetoric is pure BS you are a REAL septic
"head so full of shit you know nothing
Now you sound like Fran or Ordog are you related. Maybe you are a
Dolf clone?
Post by Petzl
Anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of
our Lord Jesus Christ".
Yes and yet what I posted is correct.
Post by Petzl
even the "Dating System" is now removing washing traces of Christ with
BC and AD are now refered to by PC pointyheads as BCE and CE {Common
Era and Before Common Era}
Tell me what does AD stand for?
Post by Petzl
The "The Treaty of Paris" 1783 which turned American Colonists into
Christian USA citizens starts
In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.
Rather deceptive here aren't you' The treaty starts
"In the Name of the most Holy & undivided Trinity.
It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the Hearts of the
most Serene and most Potent Prince George the Third, by the Grace of
God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the
Faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, Arch- Treasurer and Prince
Elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc.. and of the United States of
America"
Post by Petzl
Ends
Done at Paris, this third day of September in the year of our Lord,
one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three.
D. HARTLEY (SEAL)
JOHN ADAMS (SEAL)
B. FRANKLIN (SEAL)
JOHN JAY (SEAL)
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
Well if this is all you have guess you lost.
Our Constitution has a strict standard for separation of Church and
State. Does the Australian Constitution?
You a militant atheist? They are just as bad as a fundamentalist
Christian or Muslim.
Hope you don't believe your rhetoric. Separation of Church and state
cane about because after Anglicanism (run by British Loyalists) came
the States running their own churchs.
Did they and how does that violate separation of Church and State?
Post by Petzl
You need to do your own reasearch not the bull some Jews have worked
into PC America
What have Jews to do with this. To the best of my knowledge there
were no Jews among the US's founding fathers.
Can you provide a cite if you have evidence there was?
Check out LBJ and his influence in avocation as president of
"multiculturalism" 1960's
LBJ was a Zionist not a Jew, like me but are wary of Jewish input
--
Petzl
Good lawyers know the law
Great lawyers know the judge
MattB
2018-07-23 04:06:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God whose compound
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
You must be Christian if you've ever written say 2018 on anything?
Anno Domini is basically a dating system. The American founders were
not mostly Christians as you claim but were either followed Deism or
were greatly influenced by it.
Your rhetoric is pure BS you are a REAL septic
"head so full of shit you know nothing
Now you sound like Fran or Ordog are you related. Maybe you are a
Dolf clone?
Post by Petzl
Anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of
our Lord Jesus Christ".
Yes and yet what I posted is correct.
Post by Petzl
even the "Dating System" is now removing washing traces of Christ with
BC and AD are now refered to by PC pointyheads as BCE and CE {Common
Era and Before Common Era}
Tell me what does AD stand for?
Post by Petzl
The "The Treaty of Paris" 1783 which turned American Colonists into
Christian USA citizens starts
In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.
Rather deceptive here aren't you' The treaty starts
"In the Name of the most Holy & undivided Trinity.
It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the Hearts of the
most Serene and most Potent Prince George the Third, by the Grace of
God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the
Faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, Arch- Treasurer and Prince
Elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc.. and of the United States of
America"
Post by Petzl
Ends
Done at Paris, this third day of September in the year of our Lord,
one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three.
D. HARTLEY (SEAL)
JOHN ADAMS (SEAL)
B. FRANKLIN (SEAL)
JOHN JAY (SEAL)
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
Well if this is all you have guess you lost.
Our Constitution has a strict standard for separation of Church and
State. Does the Australian Constitution?
You a militant atheist? They are just as bad as a fundamentalist
Christian or Muslim.
Hope you don't believe your rhetoric. Separation of Church and state
cane about because after Anglicanism (run by British Loyalists) came
the States running their own churchs.
Did they and how does that violate separation of Church and State?
Post by Petzl
You need to do your own reasearch not the bull some Jews have worked
into PC America
What have Jews to do with this. To the best of my knowledge there
were no Jews among the US's founding fathers.
Can you provide a cite if you have evidence there was?
Check out LBJ and his influence in avocation as president of
"multiculturalism" 1960's
LBJ was a Zionist not a Jew, like me but are wary of Jewish input
What has that to do with the US Constitution?
Petzl
2018-07-23 07:02:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God whose compound
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
You must be Christian if you've ever written say 2018 on anything?
Anno Domini is basically a dating system. The American founders were
not mostly Christians as you claim but were either followed Deism or
were greatly influenced by it.
Your rhetoric is pure BS you are a REAL septic
"head so full of shit you know nothing
Now you sound like Fran or Ordog are you related. Maybe you are a
Dolf clone?
Post by Petzl
Anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of
our Lord Jesus Christ".
Yes and yet what I posted is correct.
Post by Petzl
even the "Dating System" is now removing washing traces of Christ with
BC and AD are now refered to by PC pointyheads as BCE and CE {Common
Era and Before Common Era}
Tell me what does AD stand for?
Post by Petzl
The "The Treaty of Paris" 1783 which turned American Colonists into
Christian USA citizens starts
In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.
Rather deceptive here aren't you' The treaty starts
"In the Name of the most Holy & undivided Trinity.
It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the Hearts of the
most Serene and most Potent Prince George the Third, by the Grace of
God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the
Faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, Arch- Treasurer and Prince
Elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc.. and of the United States of
America"
Post by Petzl
Ends
Done at Paris, this third day of September in the year of our Lord,
one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three.
D. HARTLEY (SEAL)
JOHN ADAMS (SEAL)
B. FRANKLIN (SEAL)
JOHN JAY (SEAL)
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
Well if this is all you have guess you lost.
Our Constitution has a strict standard for separation of Church and
State. Does the Australian Constitution?
You a militant atheist? They are just as bad as a fundamentalist
Christian or Muslim.
Hope you don't believe your rhetoric. Separation of Church and state
cane about because after Anglicanism (run by British Loyalists) came
the States running their own churchs.
Did they and how does that violate separation of Church and State?
Post by Petzl
You need to do your own reasearch not the bull some Jews have worked
into PC America
What have Jews to do with this. To the best of my knowledge there
were no Jews among the US's founding fathers.
Can you provide a cite if you have evidence there was?
Check out LBJ and his influence in avocation as president of
"multiculturalism" 1960's
LBJ was a Zionist not a Jew, like me but are wary of Jewish input
What has that to do with the US Constitution?
Work it out youself
"Multiculturism" was used to by-pass your constitution and it's
Christian values and laws
--
Petzl
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions,
the judiciary must apply the law!
Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australian Constitution was finally adopted and on behalf of future generations,
‘Our Australian Commonwealth from its first stage will be a Christian Commonwealth’.
de chucka
2018-07-23 07:11:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God whose compound
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
You must be Christian if you've ever written say 2018 on anything?
Anno Domini is basically a dating system. The American founders were
not mostly Christians as you claim but were either followed Deism or
were greatly influenced by it.
Your rhetoric is pure BS you are a REAL septic
"head so full of shit you know nothing
Now you sound like Fran or Ordog are you related. Maybe you are a
Dolf clone?
Post by Petzl
Anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of
our Lord Jesus Christ".
Yes and yet what I posted is correct.
Post by Petzl
even the "Dating System" is now removing washing traces of Christ with
BC and AD are now refered to by PC pointyheads as BCE and CE {Common
Era and Before Common Era}
Tell me what does AD stand for?
Post by Petzl
The "The Treaty of Paris" 1783 which turned American Colonists into
Christian USA citizens starts
In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.
Rather deceptive here aren't you' The treaty starts
"In the Name of the most Holy & undivided Trinity.
It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the Hearts of the
most Serene and most Potent Prince George the Third, by the Grace of
God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the
Faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, Arch- Treasurer and Prince
Elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc.. and of the United States of
America"
Post by Petzl
Ends
Done at Paris, this third day of September in the year of our Lord,
one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three.
D. HARTLEY (SEAL)
JOHN ADAMS (SEAL)
B. FRANKLIN (SEAL)
JOHN JAY (SEAL)
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
Well if this is all you have guess you lost.
Our Constitution has a strict standard for separation of Church and
State. Does the Australian Constitution?
You a militant atheist? They are just as bad as a fundamentalist
Christian or Muslim.
Hope you don't believe your rhetoric. Separation of Church and state
cane about because after Anglicanism (run by British Loyalists) came
the States running their own churchs.
Did they and how does that violate separation of Church and State?
Post by Petzl
You need to do your own reasearch not the bull some Jews have worked
into PC America
What have Jews to do with this. To the best of my knowledge there
were no Jews among the US's founding fathers.
Can you provide a cite if you have evidence there was?
Check out LBJ and his influence in avocation as president of
"multiculturalism" 1960's
LBJ was a Zionist not a Jew, like me but are wary of Jewish input
What has that to do with the US Constitution?
Work it out youself
"Multiculturism" was used to by-pass your constitution and it's
Christian values and laws
So there is no Constitutional basis in either Australia or the US for
your Christian claim
MattB
2018-07-23 07:48:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
True but it has no bill of rights to limit the powers of government.
The powers of Gov are defined by the Constitution so there powe is limited
Would it allow for some of the things say Venezuela has done to be
done there?
Never read your Constitution.
Neither Australia or the USA obey their Christian constitution, feed
everyone bull that it's written wrong.
neither have one
The USA does not have a Christian Constitution.
Their legal definition of God is also the Christian God whose compound
redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ.
Check the Date sometime
This twenty second day of July in the year of our Lord, two thousand
and eighteen.
You must be Christian if you've ever written say 2018 on anything?
Anno Domini is basically a dating system. The American founders were
not mostly Christians as you claim but were either followed Deism or
were greatly influenced by it.
Your rhetoric is pure BS you are a REAL septic
"head so full of shit you know nothing
Now you sound like Fran or Ordog are you related. Maybe you are a
Dolf clone?
Post by Petzl
Anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of
our Lord Jesus Christ".
Yes and yet what I posted is correct.
Post by Petzl
even the "Dating System" is now removing washing traces of Christ with
BC and AD are now refered to by PC pointyheads as BCE and CE {Common
Era and Before Common Era}
Tell me what does AD stand for?
Post by Petzl
The "The Treaty of Paris" 1783 which turned American Colonists into
Christian USA citizens starts
In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.
Rather deceptive here aren't you' The treaty starts
"In the Name of the most Holy & undivided Trinity.
It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the Hearts of the
most Serene and most Potent Prince George the Third, by the Grace of
God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the
Faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, Arch- Treasurer and Prince
Elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc.. and of the United States of
America"
Post by Petzl
Ends
Done at Paris, this third day of September in the year of our Lord,
one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three.
D. HARTLEY (SEAL)
JOHN ADAMS (SEAL)
B. FRANKLIN (SEAL)
JOHN JAY (SEAL)
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
Well if this is all you have guess you lost.
Our Constitution has a strict standard for separation of Church and
State. Does the Australian Constitution?
You a militant atheist? They are just as bad as a fundamentalist
Christian or Muslim.
Hope you don't believe your rhetoric. Separation of Church and state
cane about because after Anglicanism (run by British Loyalists) came
the States running their own churchs.
Did they and how does that violate separation of Church and State?
Post by Petzl
You need to do your own reasearch not the bull some Jews have worked
into PC America
What have Jews to do with this. To the best of my knowledge there
were no Jews among the US's founding fathers.
Can you provide a cite if you have evidence there was?
Check out LBJ and his influence in avocation as president of
"multiculturalism" 1960's
LBJ was a Zionist not a Jew, like me but are wary of Jewish input
What has that to do with the US Constitution?
Work it out youself
"Multiculturism" was used to by-pass your constitution and it's
Christian values and laws
What Christian values do you find in the US Constitution? What
Christian laws?
Ördög
2018-07-20 01:40:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
The grand US of A is one of the least socialist friendly countries of the
Western World. And it has the highest degree of public hysteria directed
against anything that could even remotely be stamped as social public
policy.


On another note: I see mainly three really effective measures which could
curb the insane money grab scams run by the upper echelons of managements
in the corporate universe:

*Increase the degree of shareholder control over management pay
decisions. (The current one is obviously not going far enough).

*Impose externally an income ceiling on all top managerial jobs (level
the playing field). As drastic as this might sound such income ceilings
for instance are already imposed on the players in the AFL and NRL.

*Use taxation as an effective disincentive for unashamed (often border
line criminal) money hoarders. Obviously this is the most dramatic one of
the possible remedies I suggest.
In the age of computers why do we still rely on silly tax brackets. Tax
people on a continuously sliding exponential curve. At some point if you
got too greedy you'd end up paying more tax than you income ever was.
That'd teach these creeps where the social limits to undeserved wealth
were when enough was enough! (I know, I am just a filthy vile communist
preaching the politics of envy....boooo).
--
Ördög, without any apologies
MattB
2018-07-20 06:23:04 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:40:28 -0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
Post by de chucka
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
The grand US of A is one of the least socialist friendly countries of the
Western World. And it has the highest degree of public hysteria directed
against anything that could even remotely be stamped as social public
policy.
Strange the closest major city to me has a open socialist on the city
council a lady named Kshama Sawant, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has a
good chance of winning a House seat.

In fact a democratic socialist and progressive named Bernie Sanders
almost won a ticket for president and has quite a following. I like
some of his ideas even would have voted for him before Hillary. No I
did not vote for Trump either before you say that.
Post by Ördög
On another note: I see mainly three really effective measures which could
curb the insane money grab scams run by the upper echelons of managements
*Increase the degree of shareholder control over management pay
decisions. (The current one is obviously not going far enough).
That would require all stock to be voting stock. That has a name but
I forgot then at this moment.
Post by Ördög
*Impose externally an income ceiling on all top managerial jobs (level
the playing field). As drastic as this might sound such income ceilings
for instance are already imposed on the players in the AFL and NRL.
Does the government have that right to tell a private company what to
do other than what taxes and safety regulation to have?
Post by Ördög
*Use taxation as an effective disincentive for unashamed (often border
line criminal) money hoarders. Obviously this is the most dramatic one of
the possible remedies I suggest.
Liberals and socialist love to tax to control. If leftist or
socialist don't approve of something they add a tax for it in the USA,
not sure if Aus does that also. They will claim the taxes will be
used for this or that purpose and yet seems little goes for their
claimed purpose.
Post by Ördög
In the age of computers why do we still rely on silly tax brackets. Tax
people on a continuously sliding exponential curve. At some point if you
got too greedy you'd end up paying more tax than you income ever was.
That'd teach these creeps where the social limits to undeserved wealth
were when enough was enough! (I know, I am just a filthy vile communist
preaching the politics of envy....boooo).
Why not just have a flat tax. Believe I paid just over 33% tax last
year.

What is sad is you were not able to point to a country that is as you
desire. Closest I would say is Norway but even Norway isn't pure
socialist and is a mix of capitalism and socialism they call it a
unitary constitutional monarchy. Believe they were inspired by the
U.S. Declaration of Independence.

So I ask again what country lives under a government like you suggest?
Name one from the past?
Daniel60
2018-07-20 07:40:35 UTC
Permalink
Ördög wrote on 20/07/18 11:40:

<Snip>
Post by Ördög
In the age of computers why do we still rely on silly tax brackets. Tax
people on a continuously sliding exponential curve. At some point if you
got too greedy you'd end up paying more tax than you income ever was.
That'd teach these creeps where the social limits to undeserved wealth
were when enough was enough! (I know, I am just a filthy vile communist
preaching the politics of envy....boooo).
I don't know about you being a communist or not ... but, then again, I
might be as well!!

For some time, I've figured our tax system is stuff, so thought I
thought I'd have a go at one.

My first rule would be that it be based around the "average wage", not
the ordinary average wage, but the real "average wage" so it takes into
account people working (paid) overtime, part-time, whatever. But this
amount cannot be determined until everybody has submitted their returns
... so, rather than "this years" results, it should be based on, say,
five years ago's average wage. So, this years Tax rates would be based
on 2013 ITR's, next year they would be based on 2014 ITR's, etc.

So, let's say 50% of this (five year old) average wage is Tax-free.
Then, the amount of Tax increases until, when you get to the (five year
old) average wage, you are paying 10% tax.
Then, when you get to *twice* the (five year old) average wage, you are
paying 20% tax.
Then, at *four* times the (five year old) average wage, you are paying
30% tax.
Then, at *eight* times the (five year old) average wage, you are paying
40% tax.
Etc., Etc,.

Of course, this means that at something like 500 times the (five year
old) average wage, you are paying 100% tax, so there might need to be
some fiddling at the top end.

So that would mean there are only two things you could adjust ... the
10% could become 9%/11%/nn%, and the "five years ago" average wage could
become the "six year ago"/"four year ago" average wage. Or, I suppose
you could go to e.g. 90% of the (five year ago) average wage.

Does that seem reasonable? Am I thinking too Communistically??
--
Daniel
Ördög
2018-07-20 11:00:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daniel60
Ördög
Post by Ördög
In the age of computers why do we still rely on silly tax brackets. Tax
people on a continuously sliding exponential curve. At some point if
you got too greedy you'd end up paying more tax than you income ever
was. That'd teach these creeps where the social limits to undeserved
wealth were when enough was enough! (I know, I am just a filthy vile
communist preaching the politics of envy....boooo).
I don't know about you being a communist or not
I am a reform communist!
Post by Daniel60
... but, then again, I
might be as well!!
For some time, I've figured our tax system is stuff, so thought I
thought I'd have a go at one.
My first rule would be that it be based around the "average wage", not
the ordinary average wage, but the real "average wage" so it takes into
account people working (paid) overtime, part-time, whatever. But this
amount cannot be determined until everybody has submitted their returns
... so, rather than "this years" results, it should be based on, say,
five years ago's average wage. So, this years Tax rates would be based
on 2013 ITR's, next year they would be based on 2014 ITR's, etc.
So, let's say 50% of this (five year old) average wage is Tax-free.
Then, the amount of Tax increases until, when you get to the (five year
old) average wage, you are paying 10% tax.
Then, when you get to *twice* the (five year old) average wage, you are
paying 20% tax.
Then, at *four* times the (five year old) average wage, you are paying
30% tax.
Then, at *eight* times the (five year old) average wage, you are paying
40% tax.
Etc., Etc,.
Of course, this means that at something like 500 times the (five year
old) average wage, you are paying 100% tax, so there might need to be
some fiddling at the top end.
So that would mean there are only two things you could adjust ... the
10% could become 9%/11%/nn%, and the "five years ago" average wage could
become the "six year ago"/"four year ago" average wage. Or, I suppose
you could go to e.g. 90% of the (five year ago) average wage.
Just stick with a relatively simple mathematical formula so people (or
their computer) can deal with it. But definitely do away with the tax
bracket system. As you earn more proportionally the percentage of tax you
pay also increases on a infinitely sliding scale. At some point it does
climb over the 100% mark...and I suppose around over 99% tax you might
start to feel that you have neared the ceiling of your income desires!
And that is the social effect of any such drastic tax system .. beyond a
certain upper limit it stops people hoarding income.
It is really not about grabbing for revenue but changing people's
motivation...in a healthy society life must be worth more than just a
mindless chase for ever more money! Specially if is done at a cost to the
rest of the community.
Post by Daniel60
Does that seem reasonable? Am I thinking too Communistically??
Not necessarily. Communism can not be simplified/restricted to a
philosophy on taxation.
It is about finding a formula for the most optimal form of relationship
of the individual and the society one lives in.
--
Ördög ---- Your newsgroup Devil
Fran
2018-07-23 06:22:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ördög
*Use taxation as an effective disincentive for unashamed (often border
line criminal) money hoarders.
But what is a money hoarder? Scrooge McDuck certainly was but other
than that, these days the only ones I can think of who hoard real old
fashioned money are OAPs who have those things called "bank accounts" or
a bikkie jar holding cash for the week' groceries.

Most people stash excess in investments so is that what you mean by
money hoarding?
Petzl
2018-07-23 07:04:25 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:22:56 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Ördög
*Use taxation as an effective disincentive for unashamed (often border
line criminal) money hoarders.
But what is a money hoarder? Scrooge McDuck certainly was but other
than that, these days the only ones I can think of who hoard real old
fashioned money are OAPs who have those things called "bank accounts" or
a bikkie jar holding cash for the week' groceries.
Most people stash excess in investments so is that what you mean by
money hoarding?
Malcolm Turnbull don't pay tax because he is a "charity"
https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/editorial-the-figjam-philanthropist,11644
https://is.gd/GsmwIF
--
Petzl
"To Be A Politician You Need Three Things. Be a Good Liar, A Great Cheat
and a Brilliant Thief." Malcolm Turnbull


Malcolm applied to be a Senator for the Lobor party
https://spectator.com.au/2017/01/turnbulls-labor-dream/
Fran
2018-07-23 08:30:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:22:56 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Ördög
*Use taxation as an effective disincentive for unashamed (often border
line criminal) money hoarders.
But what is a money hoarder? Scrooge McDuck certainly was but other
than that, these days the only ones I can think of who hoard real old
fashioned money are OAPs who have those things called "bank accounts" or
a bikkie jar holding cash for the week' groceries.
Most people stash excess in investments so is that what you mean by
money hoarding?
Malcolm Turnbull don't pay tax because he is a "charity"
FFS!!!!! Why do you insist on posting such bullshit!

Do try to understand a few basic facts about life in modern Australia.

Turnbull (like every single other MP and State politician across the
country) would pay tax on his salary just as every other single PAYG
salary earner does. Because Turnbull's pay is paid out by public
servants and is paid through a government system, there is no way that
it is possible for him to avoid paying tax as it's deducted PRIOR to the
money going into his account.

IF he then pays that salary into a charitable Foundation that he and
Lucy have formed, then that does not mean that Turnbull doesn't pay tax
- he's ALREADY paid the tax on his salary!
.
Post by Petzl
https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/editorial-the-figjam-philanthropist,11644
https://is.gd/GsmwIF
Petzl
2018-07-23 23:31:20 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 18:30:46 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:22:56 +1000, Fran
Post by Fran
Post by Ördög
*Use taxation as an effective disincentive for unashamed (often border
line criminal) money hoarders.
But what is a money hoarder? Scrooge McDuck certainly was but other
than that, these days the only ones I can think of who hoard real old
fashioned money are OAPs who have those things called "bank accounts" or
a bikkie jar holding cash for the week' groceries.
Most people stash excess in investments so is that what you mean by
money hoarding?
Malcolm Turnbull don't pay tax because he is a "charity"
FFS!!!!! Why do you insist on posting such bullshit!
Do try to understand a few basic facts about life in modern Australia.
Turnbull (like every single other MP and State politician across the
country) would pay tax on his salary just as every other single PAYG
salary earner does. Because Turnbull's pay is paid out by public
servants and is paid through a government system, there is no way that
it is possible for him to avoid paying tax as it's deducted PRIOR to the
money going into his account.
IF he then pays that salary into a charitable Foundation that he and
Lucy have formed, then that does not mean that Turnbull doesn't pay tax
- he's ALREADY paid the tax on his salary!
.
https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/editorial-the-figjam-philanthropist,11644
https://is.gd/GsmwIF
Turnbull would have to pay PAYE tax IF he just collected banked his
salary. He doesn't Turnbull made a personal private charity he calls
"The Turnbull Foundation" which incurs no as in zero tax! He may buy a
bike for a Aboriginal tribe but not anything more.

He bought a blue shovel from his fund? For drought relief!
Loading Image...
the Clinton's also play the same wrought! but they have a friendly
fakenews media.
--
Petzl
"To Be A Politician You Need Three Things. Be a Good Liar, A Great Cheat
and a Brilliant Thief." Malcolm Turnbull


Malcolm applied to be a Senator for the Lobor party
https://spectator.com.au/2017/01/turnbulls-labor-dream/
MattB
2018-07-20 05:52:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by de chucka
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:32:23 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:36:35 -0700 (PDT), Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Externalised costs are the business of society. Massive income disparities like this should be regulated by government.
Then why should I invest in a government controlled business when I'm
not allowed to make a profit?
You'll make more profit if companies aren't wasting vast million$ on hyper-inflated salaries and bonuses.
Can you show where this is so in the modern era?
What country is this done in?
Murdoch is a common example
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/18/murdoch-family-news-corp-shareholder-revolt
https://is.gd/f9V3Ag
ndependent investors tried to scrap ‘undemocratic’ system that gives
family 39.4% control despite owning just 14% of shares
That is not a answer to my question
What country is this done in? What country lives up to your
standards.
Only Marxist–Leninist countries use pure socialism. China, Cuba, Laos
and Vietnam.
None of which are pure socialist countries
Close as you are going to get.
Maybe you can answer the question what country lives by the standards
and have no capitalism?
None afaik, of course all countries are socialist to some degree
Yes I agree. Pure capitalism would be immoral to me. A balance
between socialist and capitalism factors are needed for a truly good
government and freedom of the individual.

I believe government supported Capitalism to be a danger as well.
Petzl
2018-07-17 04:46:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Male CEO's make more profit?
--
Petzl
Mark Latham has seen the light
Voting Coalition, Labor or "Greens" because you hate One Nation is like eating shit because you hate spinach

ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens"
*LAST*, Federal State and Council!
Ördög
2018-07-17 05:14:31 UTC
Permalink
Petz
Post by Petzl
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare,
or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest
public companies.
But that's not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
Male CEO's make more profit?
I don't think so!
But they definitely love (free-marketeering) wanking and abusing the
working class, which if possible is done in the headlines of your
favourite Murdoched alternative-newsproducts!
I'd say a lot more so than their female counterparts.

:P
--
Ördög ---- Your newsgroup Devil
(Your scary shadow that says "Boo" in the dark)
MattB
2018-07-17 07:40:41 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 05:14:31 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
Petz
Post by Petzl
Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare,
or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia?s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia?s 100 biggest
public companies.
But that's not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers?
earnings over the past 12 months."
Male CEO's make more profit?
I don't think so!
But they definitely love (free-marketeering) wanking and abusing the
working class, which if possible is done in the headlines of your
favourite Murdoched alternative-newsproducts!
I'd say a lot more so than their female counterparts.
The company I work with has never had a female CEO and isn't likely to
for a decade or so. People should hire the best and yet I agree they
should be paid the same for doing the same work. Tying bonuses to
profit is fare.
Post by Ördög
:P
MattB
2018-07-17 07:40:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Male CEO's make more profit?
Don't know. In companies with stock don't the stock holders decide
most issues? You going to take away the voting writes of those that
invest?
Petzl
2018-07-17 09:51:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Male CEO's make more profit?
Don't know. In companies with stock don't the stock holders decide
most issues? You going to take away the voting writes of those that
invest?
Investors simply sell down stocks they believe will underperform.
--
Petzl
Good lawyers know the law
Great lawyers know the judge
MattB
2018-07-17 19:16:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Male CEO's make more profit?
Don't know. In companies with stock don't the stock holders decide
most issues? You going to take away the voting writes of those that
invest?
Investors simply sell down stocks they believe will underperform.
If they own voting stick they also get to vote on issues such as who
is CEO and pay and such.

If I owned large amount of Stock in a company about to be taken over
by a government I'd consider dumping it. Part if the purpose of
owning stock is to make money off your investment.
Petzl
2018-07-18 00:01:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Male CEO's make more profit?
Don't know. In companies with stock don't the stock holders decide
most issues? You going to take away the voting writes of those that
invest?
Investors simply sell down stocks they believe will underperform.
If they own voting stick they also get to vote on issues such as who
is CEO and pay and such.
If I owned large amount of Stock in a company about to be taken over
by a government I'd consider dumping it. Part if the purpose of
owning stock is to make money off your investment.
pretty unusual to vote out CEO's their stock options usually give the
"board" the say so. Best to dump stock with bad CEO's, cause price to
drop. Case in point CEO of ORI had the stock price down to less than
$2 from $60 after Warren Haynes died replaced by Philip Weickhardt
it wasn't until Malcolm Broomhead replaced him that stock price shot
up
--
Petzl
If voting made any difference,
they wouldn't let us do it- Mark Twain
de chucka
2018-07-18 01:28:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Male CEO's make more profit?
Don't know. In companies with stock don't the stock holders decide
most issues? You going to take away the voting writes of those that
invest?
Investors simply sell down stocks they believe will underperform.
If they own voting stick they also get to vote on issues such as who
is CEO and pay and such.
If I owned large amount of Stock in a company about to be taken over
by a government I'd consider dumping it. Part if the purpose of
owning stock is to make money off your investment.
pretty unusual to vote out CEO's their stock options usually give the
"board" the say so.
How do they vote a share option?
Post by Petzl
Best to dump stock with bad CEO's,
Great idea, dump your stock and lose money

cause price to
Post by Petzl
drop. Case in point CEO of ORI had the stock price down to less than
$2 from $60 after Warren Haynes died replaced by Philip Weickhardt
it wasn't until Malcolm Broomhead replaced him that stock price shot
up
What has Orica's performance got to do with anything
MattB
2018-07-18 02:51:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Male CEO's make more profit?
Don't know. In companies with stock don't the stock holders decide
most issues? You going to take away the voting writes of those that
invest?
Investors simply sell down stocks they believe will underperform.
If they own voting stick they also get to vote on issues such as who
is CEO and pay and such.
If I owned large amount of Stock in a company about to be taken over
by a government I'd consider dumping it. Part if the purpose of
owning stock is to make money off your investment.
pretty unusual to vote out CEO's their stock options usually give the
"board" the say so.
How do they vote a share option?
Post by Petzl
Best to dump stock with bad CEO's,
Great idea, dump your stock and lose money
Socialist take over and you also lose money. There might be room for
a little improvement but like it as it is now.

In the USA I wouldn't mind a slight tax increase of 100% of the tax
increase went to pay down the debt. Interest of 470 billion and going
up every year is sickening. Obama and Trump are bad for the future of
US kids.
Post by de chucka
cause price to
Post by Petzl
drop. Case in point CEO of ORI had the stock price down to less than
$2 from $60 after Warren Haynes died replaced by Philip Weickhardt
it wasn't until Malcolm Broomhead replaced him that stock price shot
up
What has Orica's performance got to do with anything
Petzl
2018-07-18 09:26:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by de chucka
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Male CEO's make more profit?
Don't know. In companies with stock don't the stock holders decide
most issues? You going to take away the voting writes of those that
invest?
Investors simply sell down stocks they believe will underperform.
If they own voting stick they also get to vote on issues such as who
is CEO and pay and such.
If I owned large amount of Stock in a company about to be taken over
by a government I'd consider dumping it. Part if the purpose of
owning stock is to make money off your investment.
pretty unusual to vote out CEO's their stock options usually give the
"board" the say so.
How do they vote a share option?
Post by Petzl
Best to dump stock with bad CEO's,
Great idea, dump your stock and lose money
cause price to
Post by Petzl
drop. Case in point CEO of ORI had the stock price down to less than
$2 from $60 after Warren Haynes died replaced by Philip Weickhardt
it wasn't until Malcolm Broomhead replaced him that stock price shot
up
What has Orica's performance got to do with anything
price resurrection was purely due to confidence in the CEO.
--
Petzl
Good lawyers know the law
Great lawyers know the judge
MattB
2018-07-18 02:34:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Male CEO's make more profit?
Don't know. In companies with stock don't the stock holders decide
most issues? You going to take away the voting writes of those that
invest?
Investors simply sell down stocks they believe will underperform.
If they own voting stick they also get to vote on issues such as who
is CEO and pay and such.
If I owned large amount of Stock in a company about to be taken over
by a government I'd consider dumping it. Part if the purpose of
owning stock is to make money off your investment.
pretty unusual to vote out CEO's their stock options usually give the
"board" the say so. Best to dump stock with bad CEO's, cause price to
drop. Case in point CEO of ORI had the stock price down to less than
$2 from $60 after Warren Haynes died replaced by Philip Weickhardt
it wasn't until Malcolm Broomhead replaced him that stock price shot
up
Depends on the stock. If the CEO is the majority shareholder of
voting stock hard to replace.

I consider stocks a long term investment.
Daniel60
2018-07-20 07:46:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Male CEO's make more profit?
Don't know. In companies with stock don't the stock holders decide
most issues? You going to take away the voting writes of those that
invest?
In a lot of companies, a large portion of the shares are held by other
companies (Banks, Investment Co, etc), so they would not be wanting to
change the set-up of the Board as it may adversely effect their returns,
their profits, their own boardmenbers, etc!
--
Daniel
MattB
2018-07-20 18:49:07 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:46:42 +1000, Daniel60
Post by Daniel60
Post by MattB
Post by Petzl
Post by MattB
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Ördög
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
What do you believe the government should do about the internal
working of a privately owned company?
Male CEO's make more profit?
Don't know. In companies with stock don't the stock holders decide
most issues? You going to take away the voting writes of those that
invest?
In a lot of companies, a large portion of the shares are held by other
companies (Banks, Investment Co, etc), so they would not be wanting to
change the set-up of the Board as it may adversely effect their returns,
their profits, their own boardmenbers, etc!
Yet ultimately they are owned by people. What would happen to
Australia if you tried to impose Ordog's brand of control of
businesses and all international invertors pulled out?

Without a 'Bill of rights' defending the people from government
excesses Australia could become another Venezuela. Venezuela also
disarmed it's people before the tyrants took control.
Niska Hubot
2018-07-18 07:56:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
No, I think a company should be able to pay whatever it takes to attract
the best person.
The only thing that pisses me off is the golden parachute: when they
pay somebody a million plus to get rid of them, because they were a
sexual predator or a bullshit shyster or asleep at the wheel when the
company went over a cliff.
news18
2018-07-18 13:57:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Niska Hubot
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare,
or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
No, I think a company should be able to pay whatever it takes to attract
the best person.
I suspect that guy is actually employnh himself and his buddies go along
with whatever he does because he is their gravy train.
Post by Niska Hubot
The only thing that pisses me off is the golden parachute: when they pay
somebody a million plus to get rid of them, because they were a sexual
predator or a bullshit shyster or asleep at the wheel when the company
went over a cliff.
Agreed.
Ördög
2018-07-19 06:55:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Niska Hubot
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare,
or are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
No, I think a company should be able to pay whatever it takes to attract
the best person.
The only thing that pisses me off is the golden parachute: when they pay
somebody a million plus to get rid of them, because they were a sexual
predator or a bullshit shyster or asleep at the wheel when the company
went over a cliff.
That "best person" thingy is such a rubbery concept!
Does that mean that this "best person" works 78 times more hours per week
more than the average punter? Does that mean that this "best person"
really works 78 times better than let say a shift working health
professional on an emergency ward of a major hospital? Does that mean
that this "best person" is 78 times more human than the rest of us?

Or does that mean that this golden spoon fed born to rule wonder has 78
times better connections in the right top executive circles of big
business and politics than the average punter? Golden jobs the rich
mates, eh?
--
Ördög ---- Your newsgroup Devil
dolf
2018-07-18 12:41:44 UTC
Permalink
What about ‘weakman politics’ do you have anything to say about that?

SUMMARY ONLY:
That the Financial Services Royal Commission are going to become aware that
the Insurer in relation to my salary continuance claim and the
extraordinary VCAT Hearing of 7 December 2001 of their representations
being PERJURY and lies in relation my involvement (ie. I had 4 x 5 minutes
= 20 minutes as strata of temporality: #1440 / #72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE =
20 minutes) within Anti-terrorism activism and #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
TERRORIST EVENT which is clearly conveyed within my 2 courtesy telephone
calls as that which they maliciously misrepresented and as contempt not
accountable for:

#419 - KILL THE SOUL
#390 - GRAVE ROBBERS {WREATHS / CROWN: 4 JULY / ZION: monument; raised up;
sepulcher = GRAVE
#288 - UMBRA / TERRORIST EVENT: 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 / BEERSHEBA {OATH}

In whatever circumstance, it is capable of being hosted upon the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS as it's mechanism for delivery and
staging which then becomes an acute and risky precipice consideration that
is accorded entirely by my Intellectual Property and thusly my reasonable
objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 / #33
- #INR / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS ethic upon our {#390 /
#288 / #419} war dead and usurping the @1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 -
HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth's Governance which is defined as a
PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen Victoria's
Letters Patent of 17 September 1900 as the instrumentation of Federation
into a nation.

The MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED is not
homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”

<Loading Image...>

#YOD {10 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#MEM {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU - CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH {23 CHROMOSOMES}

ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.

Because I am able to resolve all my statements within those phone calls
which they found threatening to a mathematical model (which includes a
notion of the economy) with multiple examples, they have no rational basis
for the claims made at VCAT on 7 December 2001.

And because they have been found to have acted unlawfully I can have the
matter reconsidered.

A mathematical model cannot be threatening...

I would imagine that the insurer’s former legal counsel (with 4 degrees)
will be brought before the Royal Commission and that lots of soldiers and
emergency services workers whom are likely to develop PTSD will be
overjoyed with my representations for them.

It would hardly be fair and reasonable that I would get a substantial
payout when they would get nothing.

In practical functional terms of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL applicable to
the Insurance / Financial Services industry that if the perennialist use of
the binomial THEORY OF NUMBER METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 +
#3 + #4 = #10} has an inherent deficiency TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]
and an introduction of a further dichotomy such as “TOTAL AND PERMANENT
DISABILITY” as a disparity between SALARY CONTINUANCE INSURANCE POLICY and
that of SUPERANNUATION portfolios it is as #1 + #2 + #3 + #4 = #10 capable
of destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and overriding such integrity as
a SOVEREIGN principle.

Furthermore in relation to a disproportionate or non existent insurance
benefit being applied to the chronic psychiatric condition known as PTSD -
POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER in the circumstance where effective
GOVERNANCE is a product of SAPIENT reality and our proposition to extend
definition of a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO
[iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN
THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.”

That the Insurance Industry’s failure to appropriately manage and in
circumstance of a lack of provision as appropriate medical intervention to
the precursor medical condition: “hyper-arousal of the central nervous
system and stress of the startle reflex” is then (ie. I can articulate time
after all and I have an experience of a bomb blast on 27 March 1986) causal
for the exasperation of the medical condition in a chronic state.

Such is a provisional and workable hypothesis and I thank the Financial
Services Royal Commission for not refusing my statements and since they
have included graphics relevant to a #391 - SAPIENT (ARTIFICIAL
INTELLECTUAL NUANCED) ECONOMY (HOMOIOS) I have taken the liberty of
emailing a further submission on the understanding that each area of
sapient expertise has its own nomenclature (ie. terms applicable to any
relevant universe of discourse).

I hope that such metempirical / metaphysical as jurisprudent summary of the
unlawful and unconstitutional conduct and its association to the LETTERS
PATENT TO THE COMMONWEALTH by which the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION
has been empowered is sufficient for them to take consideration of my
assistance accorded to them.

So Mr Obama, what have you ever done for your country besides weak,
ineffectual as empty words?

- dolf
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-07-18 16:51:55 UTC
Permalink
— HOITY-TOITY JERK —

“KERNEL SINCE PLEASANCE IS UGLY.
TAKE A DO IT YOURSELF APPROACH.
AS INDIFFERENCE TO HER FUGLY.
AND BY ALL MEANS A REPROACH.

MAKE HER CLEAN UP THE MESS.
DON’T BLOW DRY AS HER FANNY.
PRESIDENTIAL EDICT ON HER DRESS.
SINCE YOUR PRICK IS TEENY WEENY.”

STRONG-POLITICS@{
@1: Sup: 66 (#66); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 61 (#127); Ego: 77 (#80),
@3: Sup: 60 (#187); Ego: 69 (#149),
@4: Sup: 13 (#200); Ego: 48 (#197),
@5: Sup: 57 (#257); Ego: 46 (#243),
@6: Sup: 59 (#316); Ego: 33 (#276),
@7: Sup: 50 (#366); Ego: 38 (#314),
@8: Sup: 74 (#440); Ego: 10 (#324),
@9: Sup: 8 (#448); Ego: 31 (#355),
Male: #448; Feme: #355
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,448}&idea:{f,335}>

HOITY-TOITY (adjective):
- assuming airs; pretentious; haughty.
- giddy; flighty.
noun
- giddy behavior.
- Word of the Day for 19 July 2018; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #13 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.

    #VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
    #TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
    #POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
    #TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
    #CANON: #139

#448 as [#1, #5, #2, #400, #40] = 'ahabah (H160): {#0 as #13 % #41 = #13}
1) love; 2) God's love to His people; 1a) human love for human object; 1a1)
of man toward man; 1a2) of man toward himself; 1a3) between man and woman;
1a4) sexual desire;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #43 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.

    #VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
    #TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
    #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
    #TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
    #CANON: #84

#448 as [#5, #3, #4, #30, #6, #400] = gadowl (H1419): {#2 as #43 % #41 =
#2} 1) great; 1a) large (in magnitude and extent); 1b) in number; 1c) in
intensity; 1d) loud (in sound); 1e) older (in age); 1f) in importance; 1f1)
important things; 1f2) great, distinguished (of men); 1f3) God Himself (of
God) subst; 1g) great things; 1h) *haughty* things; 1i) greatness;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #295 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 - The
Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;

THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards; I am
not a robber of sacred property.

    #VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
    #TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence between
word and deed.
    #POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
    #TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
    #CANON: #200

#335 as [#40, #90, #200, #5] = tsarah (H6869): {#4 as #295 % #41 = #8} 1)
straits, distress, trouble; 2) vexer, *rival* *wife*;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1457 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.

    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175

#335 as [#1, #50, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #1, #200] = anaphero (G399): {#10
as #1457 % #41 = #22} 1) to carry or bring up, to lead up; 2) to put upon
the altar, to bring to the altar, to offer; 3) to lift up one's self, to
take upon one's self; 1a) men to a higher place; 3a) to place on one's self
*anything* *as* *a* *load* *to* *be* *carried*; 3b) to sustain, ie. their
punishment;

- dolf
Post by dolf
What about ‘weakman politics’ do you have anything to say about that?
That the Financial Services Royal Commission are going to become aware that
the Insurer in relation to my salary continuance claim and the
extraordinary VCAT Hearing of 7 December 2001 of their representations
being PERJURY and lies in relation my involvement (ie. I had 4 x 5 minutes
= 20 minutes as strata of temporality: #1440 / #72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE =
20 minutes) within Anti-terrorism activism and #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
TERRORIST EVENT which is clearly conveyed within my 2 courtesy telephone
calls as that which they maliciously misrepresented and as contempt not
#419 - KILL THE SOUL
#390 - GRAVE ROBBERS {WREATHS / CROWN: 4 JULY / ZION: monument; raised up;
sepulcher = GRAVE
#288 - UMBRA / TERRORIST EVENT: 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 / BEERSHEBA {OATH}
In whatever circumstance, it is capable of being hosted upon the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS as it's mechanism for delivery and
staging which then becomes an acute and risky precipice consideration that
is accorded entirely by my Intellectual Property and thusly my reasonable
objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 / #33
HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth's Governance which is defined as a
PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen Victoria's
Letters Patent of 17 September 1900 as the instrumentation of Federation
into a nation.
The MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED is not
homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
#YOD {10 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#MEM {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU - CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH {23 CHROMOSOMES}
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.
Because I am able to resolve all my statements within those phone calls
which they found threatening to a mathematical model (which includes a
notion of the economy) with multiple examples, they have no rational basis
for the claims made at VCAT on 7 December 2001.
And because they have been found to have acted unlawfully I can have the
matter reconsidered.
A mathematical model cannot be threatening...
I would imagine that the insurer’s former legal counsel (with 4 degrees)
will be brought before the Royal Commission and that lots of soldiers and
emergency services workers whom are likely to develop PTSD will be
overjoyed with my representations for them.
It would hardly be fair and reasonable that I would get a substantial
payout when they would get nothing.
In practical functional terms of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL applicable to
the Insurance / Financial Services industry that if the perennialist use of
the binomial THEORY OF NUMBER METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 +
#3 + #4 = #10} has an inherent deficiency TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]
and an introduction of a further dichotomy such as “TOTAL AND PERMANENT
DISABILITY” as a disparity between SALARY CONTINUANCE INSURANCE POLICY and
that of SUPERANNUATION portfolios it is as #1 + #2 + #3 + #4 = #10 capable
of destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and overriding such integrity as
a SOVEREIGN principle.
Furthermore in relation to a disproportionate or non existent insurance
benefit being applied to the chronic psychiatric condition known as PTSD -
POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER in the circumstance where effective
GOVERNANCE is a product of SAPIENT reality and our proposition to extend
definition of a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO
[iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN
THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.”
That the Insurance Industry’s failure to appropriately manage and in
circumstance of a lack of provision as appropriate medical intervention to
the precursor medical condition: “hyper-arousal of the central nervous
system and stress of the startle reflex” is then (ie. I can articulate time
after all and I have an experience of a bomb blast on 27 March 1986) causal
for the exasperation of the medical condition in a chronic state.
Such is a provisional and workable hypothesis and I thank the Financial
Services Royal Commission for not refusing my statements and since they
have included graphics relevant to a #391 - SAPIENT (ARTIFICIAL
INTELLECTUAL NUANCED) ECONOMY (HOMOIOS) I have taken the liberty of
emailing a further submission on the understanding that each area of
sapient expertise has its own nomenclature (ie. terms applicable to any
relevant universe of discourse).
I hope that such metempirical / metaphysical as jurisprudent summary of the
unlawful and unconstitutional conduct and its association to the LETTERS
PATENT TO THE COMMONWEALTH by which the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION
has been empowered is sufficient for them to take consideration of my
assistance accorded to them.
So Mr Obama, what have you ever done for your country besides weak,
ineffectual as empty words?
- dolf
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-07-18 17:05:37 UTC
Permalink
— HOITY-TOITY JERK —

“KERNEL SINCE PLEASANCE IS UGLY.
TAKE A DO IT YOURSELF APPROACH.
AS INDIFFERENCE TO HER FUGLY.
AND BY ALL MEANS A REPROACH.

MAKE HER CLEAN UP THE MESS.
DON’T BLOW DRY AS HER FANNY.
PRESIDENTIAL EDICT ON HER DRESS.
SINCE YOUR PRICK IS TEENY WEENY.”

STRONG-POLITICS@{
@1: Sup: 66 (#66); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 61 (#127); Ego: 77 (#80),
@3: Sup: 60 (#187); Ego: 69 (#149),
@4: Sup: 13 (#200); Ego: 48 (#197),
@5: Sup: 57 (#257); Ego: 46 (#243),
@6: Sup: 59 (#316); Ego: 33 (#276),
@7: Sup: 50 (#366); Ego: 38 (#314),
@8: Sup: 74 (#440); Ego: 10 (#324),
@9: Sup: 8 (#448); Ego: 31 (#355),
Male: #448; Feme: #355
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,448}&idea:{f,355}>

HOITY-TOITY (adjective):
- assuming airs; pretentious; haughty.
- giddy; flighty.
noun
- giddy behavior.
- Word of the Day for 19 July 2018; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #13 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.

    #VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
    #TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
    #POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
    #TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
    #CANON: #139

#448 as [#1, #5, #2, #400, #40] = 'ahabah (H160): {#0 as #13 % #41 = #13}
1) love; 2) God's love to His people; 1a) human love for human object; 1a1)
of man toward man; 1a2) of man toward himself; 1a3) between man and woman;
1a4) sexual desire;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #43 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.

    #VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
    #TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
    #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
    #TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
    #CANON: #84

#448 as [#5, #3, #4, #30, #6, #400] = gadowl (H1419): {#2 as #43 % #41 =
#2} 1) great; 1a) large (in magnitude and extent); 1b) in number; 1c) in
intensity; 1d) loud (in sound); 1e) older (in age); 1f) in importance; 1f1)
important things; 1f2) great, distinguished (of men); 1f3) God Himself (of
God) subst; 1g) great things; 1h) *haughty* things; 1i) greatness;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #355 % #41 = #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes; I-Ching:
H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 - Closure;

THOTH MEASURE: #27 - Oh thou whose face is behind thee, and who makest
thine appearance at thy cavern; I am not given to unnatural lust.

    #VIRTUE: With Duties (no. #27), esteem for activity.
    #TOOLS: With Darkening (no. #67), esteem for rest.
    #POSITION: With Mired (no. #3), plucked out from calamity.
    #TIME: With Aggravation (no. #76), lacking any pardons.
    #CANON: #173

#355 as [#40, #8, #300, #2, #5] = machashabah (H4284): {#4 as #355 % #41 =
#27} 1) thought, device; 1a) thought; 1b) device, plan, purpose; 1c)
invention;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #345 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;

THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am not
one of prating tongue.

    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157

#355 as [#20, #5, #50, #70, #10, #200 = kenos (G2756): {#15 as #345 % #41 =
#17} 1) empty, vain, devoid of truth; 1a) of places, vessels, etc. which
contain nothing; 1b) of men; 1b1) *empty* *handed*; 1b2) without a gift;
1c) metaph. destitute of spiritual wealth, of one who boasts of his faith
as a transcendent possession, yet is without the fruits of faith; 1d)
metaph. of endeavours, labours, *acts*, *which* *result* *in* *nothing*,
vain, fruitless, without effect; 1d1) vain of no purpose;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #990 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching:
H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 -
Departure;

THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; I am not fraudulent in measures of grain.

    #VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
    #TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
    #POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
    #TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
    #CANON: #182

#355 as [#20, #5, #100, #4, #8, #200, #8, #10] = kerdaino (G2770): {#16 as
#990 % #41 = #6} 1) to gain, acquire, to get gain; 2) metaph.; 2a) of gain
arising from shunning or escaping from evil (where we say to spare one's
self, be spared); 2b) to gain any one ie. to win him over to the kingdom of
God, to gain one to faith in Christ; 2c) to gain Christ's favour and
fellowship;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #295 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 - The
Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;

THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards; I am
not a robber of sacred property.

    #VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
    #TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence between
word and deed.
    #POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
    #TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
    #CANON: #200

#335 as [#40, #90, #200, #5] = tsarah (H6869): {#4 as #295 % #41 = #8} 1)
straits, distress, trouble; 2) vexer, *rival* *wife*;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1457 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.

    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175

#335 as [#1, #50, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #1, #200] = anaphero (G399): {#10
as #1457 % #41 = #22} 1) to carry or bring up, to lead up; 2) to put upon
the altar, to bring to the altar, to offer; 3) to lift up one's self, to
take upon one's self; 1a) men to a higher place; 3a) to place on one's self
*anything* *as* *a* *load* *to* *be* *carried*; 3b) to sustain, ie. their
punishment;

- dolf
Post by dolf
What about ‘weakman politics’ do you have anything to say about that?
That the Financial Services Royal Commission are going to become aware that
the Insurer in relation to my salary continuance claim and the
extraordinary VCAT Hearing of 7 December 2001 of their representations
being PERJURY and lies in relation my involvement (ie. I had 4 x 5 minutes
= 20 minutes as strata of temporality: #1440 / #72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE =
20 minutes) within Anti-terrorism activism and #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
TERRORIST EVENT which is clearly conveyed within my 2 courtesy telephone
calls as that which they maliciously misrepresented and as contempt not
#419 - KILL THE SOUL
#390 - GRAVE ROBBERS {WREATHS / CROWN: 4 JULY / ZION: monument; raised up;
sepulcher = GRAVE
#288 - UMBRA / TERRORIST EVENT: 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 / BEERSHEBA {OATH}
In whatever circumstance, it is capable of being hosted upon the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS as it's mechanism for delivery and
staging which then becomes an acute and risky precipice consideration that
is accorded entirely by my Intellectual Property and thusly my reasonable
objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 / #33
HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth's Governance which is defined as a
PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen Victoria's
Letters Patent of 17 September 1900 as the instrumentation of Federation
into a nation.
The MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED is not
homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
#YOD {10 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#MEM {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU - CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH {23 CHROMOSOMES}
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.
Because I am able to resolve all my statements within those phone calls
which they found threatening to a mathematical model (which includes a
notion of the economy) with multiple examples, they have no rational basis
for the claims made at VCAT on 7 December 2001.
And because they have been found to have acted unlawfully I can have the
matter reconsidered.
A mathematical model cannot be threatening...
I would imagine that the insurer’s former legal counsel (with 4 degrees)
will be brought before the Royal Commission and that lots of soldiers and
emergency services workers whom are likely to develop PTSD will be
overjoyed with my representations for them.
It would hardly be fair and reasonable that I would get a substantial
payout when they would get nothing.
In practical functional terms of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL applicable to
the Insurance / Financial Services industry that if the perennialist use of
the binomial THEORY OF NUMBER METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 +
#3 + #4 = #10} has an inherent deficiency TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]
and an introduction of a further dichotomy such as “TOTAL AND PERMANENT
DISABILITY” as a disparity between SALARY CONTINUANCE INSURANCE POLICY and
that of SUPERANNUATION portfolios it is as #1 + #2 + #3 + #4 = #10 capable
of destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and overriding such integrity as
a SOVEREIGN principle.
Furthermore in relation to a disproportionate or non existent insurance
benefit being applied to the chronic psychiatric condition known as PTSD -
POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER in the circumstance where effective
GOVERNANCE is a product of SAPIENT reality and our proposition to extend
definition of a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO
[iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN
THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.”
That the Insurance Industry’s failure to appropriately manage and in
circumstance of a lack of provision as appropriate medical intervention to
the precursor medical condition: “hyper-arousal of the central nervous
system and stress of the startle reflex” is then (ie. I can articulate time
after all and I have an experience of a bomb blast on 27 March 1986) causal
for the exasperation of the medical condition in a chronic state.
Such is a provisional and workable hypothesis and I thank the Financial
Services Royal Commission for not refusing my statements and since they
have included graphics relevant to a #391 - SAPIENT (ARTIFICIAL
INTELLECTUAL NUANCED) ECONOMY (HOMOIOS) I have taken the liberty of
emailing a further submission on the understanding that each area of
sapient expertise has its own nomenclature (ie. terms applicable to any
relevant universe of discourse).
I hope that such metempirical / metaphysical as jurisprudent summary of the
unlawful and unconstitutional conduct and its association to the LETTERS
PATENT TO THE COMMONWEALTH by which the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION
has been empowered is sufficient for them to take consideration of my
assistance accorded to them.
So Mr Obama, what have you ever done for your country besides weak,
ineffectual as empty words?
- dolf
Post by Ördög
But they are worth every cent we the unworthy working class can spare, or
are they?
*CEOs now earn 78 times more than Aussie workers*
<http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-06/ceo-salaries-78-times-average-
australian/9216156>
"Australia’s top chief executives earn an average of $4.75 million — or
78 times more than the average Australian worker.
The stark finding comes from corporate adviser Conrad Liveris, who has
examined the remuneration of executives at Australia’s 100 biggest public
companies.
But that’s not all.
-Male CEOs earn almost $1 million more than women CEOs, on average.
-CEO earnings have climbed 46 per cent faster than typical workers’
earnings over the past 12 months."
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-07-20 19:48:36 UTC
Permalink
— [DRAFT] AUNTIE ARNIE’S [roo]TED LECTURES ON WET NOODLE USA DEMOCRATS
PARTY 🎉 POLITICS

You were saying about wet noodle politics?

YOUR DIALOG IS AS IRRATIONAL AS ARNOLD'S INFIDELITY (ie. A TESTIMONY OF
VOWS TO GOD AND BEFORE MAN) IS NOT A WHOLESOME EXAMPLE FOR AN ATHEIST TO
USE AND NEITHER HIS BLISTERING SCREWED UP FACE WHICH IS EITHER A PRODUCT OF
EXCESSIVE SUN LAMP USE OR KAPOSI SARCOMA LEGIONS LIKE GERRYMANDER ON A MAP
IS NOW THE RESULT...



LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL @ 1107 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Just to be
clear, is tax fraud a war crime?

Also, I know I saw [this] documentary some time back about how Arnold
Schwarzeneger figured out how a bloke can bear a child, but I am 99.99%
certain that I cannot do so myself.

I'm also unclear on why child bearing is a war crime, or maybe you aren't
referring to the laws on Planet Earth, but to those that pertain on Planet
Poofter?”

DOLF: “*CEASE* *YOUR* *DERANGED* *ATTACKS* *BOTH* *PUBLICLY* *AND* *BY*
*PRIVATE* *EMAILS*

ALL YOUR PRIVATE 24 EMAILS AS IRRATIONAL ONE LINE RESPONSES:

/unsubscribe gibberish

MADE TO MY MATERIA PRIMA IN PREPARATION FOR A RATIONAL ARGUMENT AS 17 to 20
JULY 2018 SUBMISSIONS MADE TO THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION /
ATTORNEY GENERALS STATE & FEDERAL / SENATOR PENNY WONG WILL BE FORWARDED
WITH THIS NOTE:

BEGIN EXCERPT: That the Financial Services Royal Commission are going to
become aware that the Insurer in relation to my salary continuance claim
and the extraordinary VCAT Hearing of 7 December 2001 of their
representations being PERJURY and lies in relation my involvement (ie. I
had 4 x 5 minutes = 20 minutes as strata of temporality: #1440 / #72 -
ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE = 20 minutes) within Anti-terrorism activism and #288 -
11 SEPTEMBER 2001 TERRORIST EVENT which is clearly conveyed within my 2
Courtesy telephone calls as that which they maliciously misrepresented and
as contempt not accountable for:

#419 - KILL THE SOUL
#390 - GRAVE ROBBERS {WREATHS / CROWN: 4 JULY / ZION: monument; raised up;
sepulcher = GRAVE
#288 - UMBRA / TERRORIST EVENT: 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 / BEERSHEBA {OATH}

WHEN I SAY THAT I HAVE A TRANSCENDENT NATURAL / COMMON LAW CLAIM TO
HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF IT RELATES TO THE METAPHYSICAL
BASIS OF THE ECONOMY ITSELF WHICH IS *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 / #288} *TO*
*EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES*
#EIGHT: #120 / #360 AND THAT IS A CONCERN TO ROYAL COMMISSION INTO
FINANCIAL SERVICES AND ALL ABOUT:

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <-- *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
#288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <-- *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345 /
#405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #334 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching:
H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 -
Departure;

THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; *I* *AM* *NOT* *FRAUDULENT* *IN* *MEASURES* *OF* *GRAIN*.

#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182 <-- MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315 *AND* *TORAH*
*PROTOTYPE* #EIGHT: #141 / #423

<-- *LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364)
+ #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of
Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5 as
#19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

Just an *ONTIC* CENTRE OF VALUE comment on the TIME OF THE AFFIRMATION
OCCURRING AT THE VCAT HEARING UPON 7 DECEMBER 2001 WHICH IS APPLICABLE TO
THE HETEROS TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE that may be hosted upon my noumenon AS
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY for THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS (ie.
VOLUNTARY WILL) and its association then to IMPROPRIETY as CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING #168 / #334 / #342 WHICH *IS* *MAPPED* *TO* TWEEDLEDUM[B]
#FIVE: #114 / #342 AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] HETEROS #SIX: #114 / #342

VCAT AFFIRMATION{4.4.7.53.1}@{
@1: Sup: 59 (#59); Ego: 59 (#59),
@2: Sup: 10 (#69); Ego: 32 (#91),
@3: Sup: 23 (#92); Ego: 13 (#104),
@4: Sup: 76 (#168 *** ONTIC VALUE CONDEMNATION AS #237 - USE OF FORCE
TEMPLATE DOCUMENT OF EASTER ON 4 APRIL 2007 TO PSYCHIATRIST KEK); Ego: 53
(#157),
@5: Sup: 53 (#221); Ego: 58 (#215),
@6: Sup: 71 (#292); Ego: 18 (#233),
@7: Sup: 6 (#298); Ego: 16 (#249),
@8: Sup: 36 (#334 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD); Ego: 30 (#279),
@9: Sup: 8 (#342 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD / @215 - HITLER TABLE TALK ON
BIBLE STUDENTS AND ADMISSIBILITY OF SUCH AS METAPHYSICS / METEMPIRICAL
JURISPRUDENCE TO THE VCAT HEARING); Ego: 53 (#332),
Male: #342; Feme: #332
}

Within philosophy, *ONTIC* (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: "of that
which is") is physical, real, or factual existence. The British
philosopher Roy Bhaskar (15 May 1944 – 19 November 2014), who was closely
associated with the philosophical movement of Critical Realism writes:

"I differentiate the '*ONTIC*' ('*ONTICAL*' etc.) from the 'ontological'. I
employ the former to refer to:

#1) whatever pertains to being generally [SUCH AS THE THOTH MEASURES AS
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES}], rather than
some distinctively philosophical (or scientific) theory of it (ontology),
so that in this sense, that of the *ONTIC*, we can speak of the *ONTIC*
presuppositions of a work of art, a joke or a strike as much as a theory of
knowledge [IN THEIR BEING ESSENTIAL RATIOCINATION QUANTITATIVE AND
CANONICAL CONSIDERATIONS AS META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES CIRCUMSCRIBING
LANGUAGE EPISTEMOLOGY]; and, within this rubric, to

#2) the intransitive objects of some specific, historically determinate,
scientific investigation (or set of such investigations [OF TEMPORAL
DISTINCTIONS]), the *ONTIC*.

Professor Ruth Groff (Political Science department at Saint Louis
University, St. Louis, Missouri) offers this expansion of Bhaskar's note
above:

"The *ONTIC* is always specified, and only identified, by its relation, as
the intransitive object(s) of some or other (denumerable set of) particular
transitive process(es) of enquiry. It is cognitive process-, and
level-specific; whereas the ontological (like the *ONTIC*) is not."

Thusly Ontoticism or onticism is the philosophical branch of ontology which
studies the factual existence.

The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
definition of *SAPIENT* that can equally apply as the discriminating norm:

9(9²+1)/2 = #369

to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence can
define factual existence:

n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}

That given the notion of *OUSIA* (Greek: οὐσία) which is analogous to the
English concepts of being and *ONTIC* used in contemporary philosophy.
*OUSIA* is translated as Latin substantia and essentia, and hence to
English as substance and essence.

END EXCERPT

THEREFORE YOU OUGHT REFRAIN FROM ANY FURTHER #432 - DISHEARTENING ACTS OF
CYBER WARFARE AS ANONYMOUS INTERNET MILITIA BEING INTENTIONAL CONDUCT OF
DEHUMANISING #325 - DETRUDE AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AS CONSTITUTING WAR
CRIMES.

THIS NOTE WILL BE FORWARDED WITH EACH COMPLIANT MADE AGAINST YOUR PERVERSE
AND DEPRAVED INDOLENT LIFE OF *PSYCHOSIS* AMOUNTING AS NOTHING MORE THAN
*CHILD* *BEARING* *WITH* *IGNORANCE* *AS* *A* *CONGENITAL* *BIRTH*
*DEFECT*, *HEDONISM* *AND* *TAX* *FRAUD*.

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Hey Dolf the
retard stop sending me e-mails. You are a idiot. You can't sue someone for
saying you are a idiot it isn't a war crime.”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “OBAMACARE CASE STUDY ON WET NOODLE
POLITICS BY DEMOCRATS (I NEVER HAD SEX WITH THAT WOMAN BUT MY EDICT BY MY
OWN BIBLE SWEARING OATH HAND WAS AS *SELFIE* UPON HER DRESS)

— HOITY-TOITY JERK —

“KERNEL SINCE PLEASANCE IS UGLY.
TAKE A DO IT YOURSELF APPROACH.
AS INDIFFERENCE TO HER FUGLY.
AND BY ALL MEANS A REPROACH.

MAKE HER CLEAN UP THE MESS.
DON’T BLOW DRY AS HER FANNY.
PRESIDENTIAL EDICT ON HER DRESS.
SINCE YOUR PRICK IS TEENY WEENY.”
OBAMACARE ESTABLISHED: March 23, 2010; 8 years ago

Most major provisions phased in by January 2014; remaining provisions
phased in by 2020; individual mandate repealed starting 2019

Barack Hussein Obama II (born August 4, 1961) is an American attorney and
politician who served as the 44th President of the United States from
January 20, 2009, to January 20, 2017.

A member of the Democratic Party, he was the first African American to
serve as president. He was previously a United States Senator from Illinois
and a member of the Illinois State Senate.”

ALLEGORICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE BIBLICAL NARRATIVES
"Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to
you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe.

Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.

For we are the *CIRCUMCISION*, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice
in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.

Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh
that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:

*CIRCUMCISED* the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of
Benjamin {son of the right hand}, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the
law, a Pharisee {set apart}; Concerning zeal, persecuting the church {#509
- *YAHAD* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLLS* *COMMUNITY* *AS* *BEING* *SABBATH*
*OBSERVANT* *JEWISH* *CHRISTIANS* [Acts 9:1-5; 28:17-22; Hebrews 6:1-20]};
touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless." [Philippians
3:1-6 (KJV)]

“But the Pharisees and *LAWYERS* rejected the counsel of God {ie. *I*
*SWEAR* *BY* *ALMIGHTY* *GOD* *INDEED*} against themselves, being not
baptized {ie. #HE {#5} ASSIGNED TO EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN GOVERNANCE
PROTOTYPE #TWO: #102 / #306; TORAH: #141 (#423) + #132 (#396) = #273
(#819)} of him.” [Luke 7:30 (KJV)]

G2671@{
   #1: Sup: 20; Ego: 20,
   #2: Sup: 21; Ego: 1,
   #3: Sup: 78; Ego: 57,
   #4: Sup: 79; Ego: 1,
   #5: Sup: 17; Ego: 19,
   #6: Sup: 18; Ego: 1,
   #7: Sup: 68; Ego: 50,
   Male: #301; Feme: #149
} // #473

#473 as [#20, #1, #300, #1, #100, #1, #50] = katara (G2671): {#13 as #423}
1) an execration, imprecation, *CURSE*;

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “Your wet noodle has pissed itself.”

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Aussies call
Americans septic and yet they have you the average Aussie?”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “It has taken me only two phone calls
and five emails to set in motion that which would make OBAMACARE be
regarded as insignificant much like the person whom brought it into being.

THAT LOUD MOUTHED SILVER-TONGUED HOITY-TOITY JERK OF A LAWYER BARACK OBAMA
OUGHT TO KNOW WITH REGARDS TO HIS ABHORRENT OATH TAKING: “...Thou shalt not
take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him
guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus 20:7 (KJV)]

THAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS SOMETHING AS A LAW ABOUT WHAT GOD CONSIDERS OF
HIMSELF AND NOT JUST ANY MISCONCEPTION OF HIM WHICH WE AS VANITY HOLD TO BE
TRUE: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their *Creator* with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

BARACK OBAMA IS WITHIN MY VIEW IN RELATION TO #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 AND
HIS VAIN OATHS TO THE CREATOR IS GUILTY OF A CRIME:

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>

#YOD {10 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#MEM {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU - CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH {23 CHROMOSOMES}

ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.

... I want to make sure for the purposes of *DAMAGES* *COMPENSATION* that
it is known your mind encapsulation by education or lack there of being a
worldview which ought to be viewed as the impetus for prejudiced gratuitous
enjoyment in breaches of the law of Lex Scantinia, as otherwise needlessly
bringing my name and family reputation as racial / religious heritage into
dis-repute or infamia as a loss of legal or social standing.

REPLY #1 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "MACRON URGES FRENCH
YOUTH TO TAKE UP MAKEUP CLASSES"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Cosmeticus.pdf>

REPLY #2 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "HYPOTEÍNOUSA: (rarely:
hypothenuse) TO HYPOTHESISE BY RATIOCINATION WITHIN MEASURED BOUNDS OF
DIVISION WITHOUT AN INCOMMENSURATE BIAS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Hypoteinousa.pdf>

REPLY #3 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "YOU WILL BE GETTING
#168 - CONDEMNATION UPON THIS CENTENARY REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY 11
NOVEMBER 2018!"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Years%20Condemn.pdf>

REPLY #4 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "FACILITATING COGNITIVE
CONSONANCE AND AVOIDING DISSONANCE AS PERCEPTIONS OF REALITY"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Reality.pdf>

REPLY #5 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “*ANZACS* *WHAT* *FOR*
(*REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* *DAY* 11 NOVEMBER *CENTENNIAL* #168 -
*CONDEMNATION*)?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/What%20For.pdf>

REPLY #6 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “STATEMENT OF COMPLAINT
OVER CONSIDERATIONS OF WAR CRIMES BY AMERICAN INTERNET MILITIA BEING
BREACHES OF 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/US%20CONSULATE%20COMPLAINT%2020180716.pdf>

- dolf
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-07-20 20:04:29 UTC
Permalink
— [DRAFT] AUNTIE ARNIE’S [roo]TED LECTURES ON WET NOODLE USA DEMOCRATS
PARTY 🎉 POLITICS

You were saying about wet noodle politics?

YOUR DIALOG IS AS IRRATIONAL AS ARNOLD'S INFIDELITY (ie. A TESTIMONY OF
VOWS TO GOD AND BEFORE MAN) IS NOT A WHOLESOME EXAMPLE FOR AN ATHEIST TO
USE AND NEITHER HIS BLISTERING SCREWED UP FACE WHICH IS EITHER A PRODUCT OF
EXCESSIVE SUN LAMP USE OR KAPOSI SARCOMA LEGIONS LIKE GERRYMANDER ON A MAP
IS NOW THE RESULT...

http://youtu.be/zsGwdhTFaJI

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL @ 1107 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Just to be
clear, is tax fraud a war crime?

Also, I know I saw [this] documentary some time back about how Arnold
Schwarzeneger figured out how a bloke can bear a child, but I am 99.99%
certain that I cannot do so myself.

I'm also unclear on why child bearing is a war crime, or maybe you aren't
referring to the laws on Planet Earth, but to those that pertain on Planet
Poofter?”

Q. What is a “cesspool of political bias”?

A. Essentially it is a mafia {ie. any small powerful or influential #123 -
GROUP in an #369 - ORGANISATION or field; clique} which places a
prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct {#78
/ #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable
collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} by conduct of detrude.

-- TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] --

"TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.

MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN'S THRONE.
JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
AGAINST HEAVEN'S SON FIRSTBORN.

NONE DENY HOLOCAUST'S CAUSE.
JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW*}."

DOLF: “*CEASE* *YOUR* *DERANGED* *ATTACKS* *BOTH* *PUBLICLY* *AND* *BY*
*PRIVATE* *EMAILS*

ALL YOUR PRIVATE 24 EMAILS AS IRRATIONAL ONE LINE RESPONSES:

/unsubscribe gibberish

MADE TO MY MATERIA PRIMA IN PREPARATION FOR A RATIONAL ARGUMENT AS 17 to 20
JULY 2018 SUBMISSIONS MADE TO THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION /
ATTORNEY GENERALS STATE & FEDERAL / SENATOR PENNY WONG WILL BE FORWARDED
WITH THIS NOTE:

BEGIN EXCERPT: That the Financial Services Royal Commission are going to
become aware that the Insurer in relation to my salary continuance claim
and the extraordinary VCAT Hearing of 7 December 2001 of their
representations being PERJURY and lies in relation my involvement (ie. I
had 4 x 5 minutes = 20 minutes as strata of temporality: #1440 / #72 -
ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE = 20 minutes) within Anti-terrorism activism and #288 -
11 SEPTEMBER 2001 TERRORIST EVENT which is clearly conveyed within my 2
Courtesy telephone calls as that which they maliciously misrepresented and
as contempt not accountable for:

#419 - KILL THE SOUL
#390 - GRAVE ROBBERS {WREATHS / CROWN: 4 JULY / ZION: monument; raised up;
sepulcher = GRAVE
#288 - UMBRA / TERRORIST EVENT: 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 / BEERSHEBA {OATH}

WHEN I SAY THAT I HAVE A TRANSCENDENT NATURAL / COMMON LAW CLAIM TO
HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF IT RELATES TO THE METAPHYSICAL
BASIS OF THE ECONOMY ITSELF WHICH IS *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 / #288} *TO*
*EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES*
#EIGHT: #120 / #360 AND THAT IS A CONCERN TO ROYAL COMMISSION INTO
FINANCIAL SERVICES AND ALL ABOUT:

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <-- *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
#288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <-- *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345 /
#405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #334 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching:
H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 -
Departure;

THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; *I* *AM* *NOT* *FRAUDULENT* *IN* *MEASURES* *OF* *GRAIN*.

#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182 <-- MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315 *AND* *TORAH*
*PROTOTYPE* #EIGHT: #141 / #423

<-- *LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364)
+ #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of
Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5 as
#19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

Just an *ONTIC* CENTRE OF VALUE comment on the TIME OF THE AFFIRMATION
OCCURRING AT THE VCAT HEARING UPON 7 DECEMBER 2001 WHICH IS APPLICABLE TO
THE HETEROS TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE that may be hosted upon my noumenon AS
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY for THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS (ie.
VOLUNTARY WILL) and its association then to IMPROPRIETY as CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING #168 / #334 / #342 WHICH *IS* *MAPPED* *TO* TWEEDLEDUM[B]
#FIVE: #114 / #342 AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] HETEROS #SIX: #114 / #342

VCAT AFFIRMATION{4.4.7.53.1}@{
@1: Sup: 59 (#59); Ego: 59 (#59),
@2: Sup: 10 (#69); Ego: 32 (#91),
@3: Sup: 23 (#92); Ego: 13 (#104),
@4: Sup: 76 (#168 *** ONTIC VALUE CONDEMNATION AS #237 - USE OF FORCE
TEMPLATE DOCUMENT OF EASTER ON 4 APRIL 2007 TO PSYCHIATRIST KEK); Ego: 53
(#157),
@5: Sup: 53 (#221); Ego: 58 (#215),
@6: Sup: 71 (#292); Ego: 18 (#233),
@7: Sup: 6 (#298); Ego: 16 (#249),
@8: Sup: 36 (#334 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD); Ego: 30 (#279),
@9: Sup: 8 (#342 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD / @215 - HITLER TABLE TALK ON
BIBLE STUDENTS AND ADMISSIBILITY OF SUCH AS METAPHYSICS / METEMPIRICAL
JURISPRUDENCE TO THE VCAT HEARING); Ego: 53 (#332),
Male: #342; Feme: #332
}

Within philosophy, *ONTIC* (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: "of that
which is") is physical, real, or factual existence. The British
philosopher Roy Bhaskar (15 May 1944 – 19 November 2014), who was closely
associated with the philosophical movement of Critical Realism writes:

"I differentiate the '*ONTIC*' ('*ONTICAL*' etc.) from the 'ontological'. I
employ the former to refer to:

#1) whatever pertains to being generally [SUCH AS THE THOTH MEASURES AS
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES}], rather than
some distinctively philosophical (or scientific) theory of it (ontology),
so that in this sense, that of the *ONTIC*, we can speak of the *ONTIC*
presuppositions of a work of art, a joke or a strike as much as a theory of
knowledge [IN THEIR BEING ESSENTIAL RATIOCINATION QUANTITATIVE AND
CANONICAL CONSIDERATIONS AS META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES CIRCUMSCRIBING
LANGUAGE EPISTEMOLOGY]; and, within this rubric, to

#2) the intransitive objects of some specific, historically determinate,
scientific investigation (or set of such investigations [OF TEMPORAL
DISTINCTIONS]), the *ONTIC*.

Professor Ruth Groff (Political Science department at Saint Louis
University, St. Louis, Missouri) offers this expansion of Bhaskar's note
above:

"The *ONTIC* is always specified, and only identified, by its relation, as
the intransitive object(s) of some or other (denumerable set of) particular
transitive process(es) of enquiry. It is cognitive process-, and
level-specific; whereas the ontological (like the *ONTIC*) is not."

Thusly Ontoticism or onticism is the philosophical branch of ontology which
studies the factual existence.

The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
definition of *SAPIENT* that can equally apply as the discriminating norm:

9(9²+1)/2 = #369

to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence can
define factual existence:

n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}

That given the notion of *OUSIA* (Greek: οὐσία) which is analogous to the
English concepts of being and *ONTIC* used in contemporary philosophy.
*OUSIA* is translated as Latin substantia and essentia, and hence to
English as substance and essence.

END EXCERPT

THEREFORE YOU OUGHT REFRAIN FROM ANY FURTHER #432 - DISHEARTENING ACTS OF
CYBER WARFARE AS ANONYMOUS INTERNET MILITIA BEING INTENTIONAL CONDUCT OF
DEHUMANISING #325 - DETRUDE AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AS CONSTITUTING WAR
CRIMES.

THIS NOTE WILL BE FORWARDED WITH EACH COMPLIANT MADE AGAINST YOUR PERVERSE
AND DEPRAVED INDOLENT LIFE OF *PSYCHOSIS* AMOUNTING AS NOTHING MORE THAN
*CHILD* *BEARING* *WITH* *IGNORANCE* *AS* *A* *CONGENITAL* *BIRTH*
*DEFECT*, *HEDONISM* *AND* *TAX* *FRAUD*.

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Hey Dolf the
retard stop sending me e-mails. You are a idiot. You can't sue someone for
saying you are a idiot it isn't a war crime.”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “OBAMACARE CASE STUDY ON WET NOODLE
POLITICS BY DEMOCRATS (I NEVER HAD SEX WITH THAT WOMAN BUT MY EDICT BY MY
OWN BIBLE SWEARING OATH HAND WAS AS *SELFIE* UPON HER DRESS)

— HOITY-TOITY JERK —

“KERNEL SINCE PLEASANCE IS UGLY.
TAKE A DO IT YOURSELF APPROACH.
AS INDIFFERENCE TO HER FUGLY.
AND BY ALL MEANS A REPROACH.

MAKE HER CLEAN UP THE MESS.
DON’T BLOW DRY AS HER FANNY.
PRESIDENTIAL EDICT ON HER DRESS.
SINCE YOUR PRICK IS TEENY WEENY.”

OBAMACARE ESTABLISHED: March 23, 2010; 8 years ago

Most major provisions phased in by January 2014; remaining provisions
phased in by 2020; individual mandate repealed starting 2019

Barack Hussein Obama II (born August 4, 1961) is an American attorney and
politician who served as the 44th President of the United States from
January 20, 2009, to January 20, 2017.

A member of the Democratic Party, he was the first African American to
serve as president. He was previously a United States Senator from Illinois
and a member of the Illinois State Senate.”

ALLEGORICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE BIBLICAL NARRATIVES
"Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to
you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe.

Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.

For we are the *CIRCUMCISION*, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice
in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.

Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh
that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:

*CIRCUMCISED* the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of
Benjamin {son of the right hand}, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the
law, a Pharisee {set apart}; Concerning zeal, persecuting the church {#509
- *YAHAD* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLLS* *COMMUNITY* *AS* *BEING* *SABBATH*
*OBSERVANT* *JEWISH* *CHRISTIANS* [Acts 9:1-5; 28:17-22; Hebrews 6:1-20]};
touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless." [Philippians
3:1-6 (KJV)]

“But the Pharisees and *LAWYERS* rejected the counsel of God {ie. *I*
*SWEAR* *BY* *ALMIGHTY* *GOD* *INDEED*} against themselves, being not
baptized {ie. #HE {#5} ASSIGNED TO EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN GOVERNANCE
PROTOTYPE #TWO: #102 / #306; TORAH: #141 (#423) + #132 (#396) = #273
(#819)} of him.” [Luke 7:30 (KJV)]

G2671@{
   #1: Sup: 20; Ego: 20,
   #2: Sup: 21; Ego: 1,
   #3: Sup: 78; Ego: 57,
   #4: Sup: 79; Ego: 1,
   #5: Sup: 17; Ego: 19,
   #6: Sup: 18; Ego: 1,
   #7: Sup: 68; Ego: 50,
   Male: #301; Feme: #149
} // #473

#473 as [#20, #1, #300, #1, #100, #1, #50] = katara (G2671): {#13 as #423}
1) an execration, imprecation, *CURSE*;

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “Your wet noodle has pissed itself.”

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Aussies call
Americans septic and yet they have you the average Aussie?”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “It has taken me only two phone calls
and five emails to set in motion that which would make OBAMACARE be
regarded as insignificant much like the person whom brought it into being.

THAT LOUD MOUTHED SILVER-TONGUED HOITY-TOITY JERK OF A LAWYER BARACK OBAMA
OUGHT TO KNOW WITH REGARDS TO HIS ABHORRENT OATH TAKING: “...Thou shalt not
take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him
guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus 20:7 (KJV)]

THAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS SOMETHING AS A LAW ABOUT WHAT GOD CONSIDERS OF
HIMSELF AND NOT JUST ANY MISCONCEPTION OF HIM WHICH WE AS VANITY HOLD TO BE
TRUE: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their *Creator* with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

BARACK OBAMA IS WITHIN MY VIEW IN RELATION TO #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 AND
HIS VAIN OATHS TO THE CREATOR IS GUILTY OF A CRIME:

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>

#YOD {10 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#MEM {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU - CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH {23 CHROMOSOMES}

ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.

... I want to make sure for the purposes of *DAMAGES* *COMPENSATION* that
it is known your mind encapsulation by education or lack there of being a
worldview which ought to be viewed as the impetus for prejudiced gratuitous
enjoyment in breaches of the law of Lex Scantinia, as otherwise needlessly
bringing my name and family reputation as racial / religious heritage into
dis-repute or infamia as a loss of legal or social standing.

REPLY #1 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "MACRON URGES FRENCH
YOUTH TO TAKE UP MAKEUP CLASSES"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Cosmeticus.pdf>

REPLY #2 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "HYPOTEÍNOUSA: (rarely:
hypothenuse) TO HYPOTHESISE BY RATIOCINATION WITHIN MEASURED BOUNDS OF
DIVISION WITHOUT AN INCOMMENSURATE BIAS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Hypoteinousa.pdf>

REPLY #3 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "YOU WILL BE GETTING
#168 - CONDEMNATION UPON THIS CENTENARY REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY 11
NOVEMBER 2018!"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Years%20Condemn.pdf>

REPLY #4 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "FACILITATING COGNITIVE
CONSONANCE AND AVOIDING DISSONANCE AS PERCEPTIONS OF REALITY"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Reality.pdf>

REPLY #5 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “*ANZACS* *WHAT* *FOR*
(*REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* *DAY* 11 NOVEMBER *CENTENNIAL* #168 -
*CONDEMNATION*)?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/What%20For.pdf>

REPLY #6 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “STATEMENT OF COMPLAINT
OVER CONSIDERATIONS OF WAR CRIMES BY AMERICAN INTERNET MILITIA BEING
BREACHES OF 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/US%20CONSULATE%20COMPLAINT%2020180716.pdf>

- dolf
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-07-20 21:14:30 UTC
Permalink
— [DRAFT] AUNTIE ARNIE’S [roo]TED LECTURES ON WET NOODLE USA DEMOCRATS
PARTY 🎉 POLITICS

You were saying about wet noodle politics?

YOUR DIALOG IS AS IRRATIONAL AS ARNOLD'S INFIDELITY (ie. A TESTIMONY OF
VOWS TO GOD AND BEFORE MAN) IS NOT A WHOLESOME EXAMPLE FOR AN ATHEIST TO
USE AND NEITHER HIS BLISTERING SCREWED UP FACE WHICH IS EITHER A PRODUCT OF
EXCESSIVE SUN LAMP USE OR KAPOSI SARCOMA LESIONS LIKE GERRYMANDER ON A MAP
IS NOW THE RESULT...

http://youtu.be/zsGwdhTFaJI

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL @ 1107 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Just to be
clear, is tax fraud a war crime?

Also, I know I saw [this] documentary some time back about how Arnold
Schwarzeneger figured out how a bloke can bear a child, but I am 99.99%
certain that I cannot do so myself.

I'm also unclear on why child bearing is a war crime, or maybe you aren't
referring to the laws on Planet Earth, but to those that pertain on Planet
Poofter?”

— MY TR[I]UMP[HANT] MAN-CHOO —

“HE IS A BILLIONAIRE.
BUT WE THE MEANS.
AND TECHNO-WARE.
SHAFT YOUR SPLEEN {bad temper; spite}.
WITH WANTON CARE.
A $6 *MILL* CLEAN.
HIS TOOL TO BARE.”

I hope that Americans are not going accuse me of election interference.

Q. What is a “cesspool of political bias”?

A. Essentially it is a mafia {ie. any small powerful or influential #123 -
GROUP in an #369 - ORGANISATION or field; clique} which places a
prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct {#78
/ #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable
collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} by conduct of detrude.

-- TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] --

"TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.

MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN'S THRONE.
JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
AGAINST HEAVEN'S SON FIRSTBORN.

NONE DENY HOLOCAUST'S CAUSE.
JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW*}."

DOLF: “*CEASE* *YOUR* *DERANGED* *ATTACKS* *BOTH* *PUBLICLY* *AND* *BY*
*PRIVATE* *EMAILS*

ALL YOUR PRIVATE 24 EMAILS AS IRRATIONAL ONE LINE RESPONSES:

/unsubscribe gibberish

MADE TO MY MATERIA PRIMA IN PREPARATION FOR A RATIONAL ARGUMENT AS 17 to 20
JULY 2018 SUBMISSIONS MADE TO THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION /
ATTORNEY GENERALS STATE & FEDERAL / SENATOR PENNY WONG WILL BE FORWARDED
WITH THIS NOTE:

BEGIN EXCERPT: That the Financial Services Royal Commission are going to
become aware that the Insurer in relation to my salary continuance claim
and the extraordinary VCAT Hearing of 7 December 2001 of their
representations being PERJURY and lies in relation my involvement (ie. I
had 4 x 5 minutes = 20 minutes as strata of temporality: #1440 / #72 -
ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE = 20 minutes) within Anti-terrorism activism and #288 -
11 SEPTEMBER 2001 TERRORIST EVENT which is clearly conveyed within my 2
Courtesy telephone calls as that which they maliciously misrepresented and
as contempt not accountable for:

#419 - KILL THE SOUL
#390 - GRAVE ROBBERS {WREATHS / CROWN: 4 JULY / ZION: monument; raised up;
sepulcher = GRAVE
#288 - UMBRA / TERRORIST EVENT: 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 / BEERSHEBA {OATH}

WHEN I SAY THAT I HAVE A TRANSCENDENT NATURAL / COMMON LAW CLAIM TO
HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF IT RELATES TO THE METAPHYSICAL
BASIS OF THE ECONOMY ITSELF WHICH IS *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 / #288} *TO*
*EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES*
#EIGHT: #120 / #360 AND THAT IS A CONCERN TO ROYAL COMMISSION INTO
FINANCIAL SERVICES AND ALL ABOUT:

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <-- *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
#288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <-- *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345 /
#405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #334 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching:
H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 -
Departure;

THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; *I* *AM* *NOT* *FRAUDULENT* *IN* *MEASURES* *OF* *GRAIN*.

#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182 <-- MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315 *AND* *TORAH*
*PROTOTYPE* #EIGHT: #141 / #423

<-- *LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364)
+ #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of
Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5 as
#19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

Just an *ONTIC* CENTRE OF VALUE comment on the TIME OF THE AFFIRMATION
OCCURRING AT THE VCAT HEARING UPON 7 DECEMBER 2001 WHICH IS APPLICABLE TO
THE HETEROS TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE that may be hosted upon my noumenon AS
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY for THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS (ie.
VOLUNTARY WILL) and its association then to IMPROPRIETY as CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING #168 / #334 / #342 WHICH *IS* *MAPPED* *TO* TWEEDLEDUM[B]
#FIVE: #114 / #342 AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] HETEROS #SIX: #114 / #342

VCAT AFFIRMATION{4.4.7.53.1}@{
@1: Sup: 59 (#59); Ego: 59 (#59),
@2: Sup: 10 (#69); Ego: 32 (#91),
@3: Sup: 23 (#92); Ego: 13 (#104),
@4: Sup: 76 (#168 *** ONTIC VALUE CONDEMNATION AS #237 - USE OF FORCE
TEMPLATE DOCUMENT OF EASTER ON 4 APRIL 2007 TO PSYCHIATRIST KEK); Ego: 53
(#157),
@5: Sup: 53 (#221); Ego: 58 (#215),
@6: Sup: 71 (#292); Ego: 18 (#233),
@7: Sup: 6 (#298); Ego: 16 (#249),
@8: Sup: 36 (#334 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD); Ego: 30 (#279),
@9: Sup: 8 (#342 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD / @215 - HITLER TABLE TALK ON
BIBLE STUDENTS AND ADMISSIBILITY OF SUCH AS METAPHYSICS / METEMPIRICAL
JURISPRUDENCE TO THE VCAT HEARING); Ego: 53 (#332),
Male: #342; Feme: #332
}

Within philosophy, *ONTIC* (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: "of that
which is") is physical, real, or factual existence. The British
philosopher Roy Bhaskar (15 May 1944 – 19 November 2014), who was closely
associated with the philosophical movement of Critical Realism writes:

"I differentiate the '*ONTIC*' ('*ONTICAL*' etc.) from the 'ontological'. I
employ the former to refer to:

#1) whatever pertains to being generally [SUCH AS THE THOTH MEASURES AS
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES}], rather than
some distinctively philosophical (or scientific) theory of it (ontology),
so that in this sense, that of the *ONTIC*, we can speak of the *ONTIC*
presuppositions of a work of art, a joke or a strike as much as a theory of
knowledge [IN THEIR BEING ESSENTIAL RATIOCINATION QUANTITATIVE AND
CANONICAL CONSIDERATIONS AS META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES CIRCUMSCRIBING
LANGUAGE EPISTEMOLOGY]; and, within this rubric, to

#2) the intransitive objects of some specific, historically determinate,
scientific investigation (or set of such investigations [OF TEMPORAL
DISTINCTIONS]), the *ONTIC*.

Professor Ruth Groff (Political Science department at Saint Louis
University, St. Louis, Missouri) offers this expansion of Bhaskar's note
above:

"The *ONTIC* is always specified, and only identified, by its relation, as
the intransitive object(s) of some or other (denumerable set of) particular
transitive process(es) of enquiry. It is cognitive process-, and
level-specific; whereas the ontological (like the *ONTIC*) is not."

Thusly Ontoticism or onticism is the philosophical branch of ontology which
studies the factual existence.

The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
definition of *SAPIENT* that can equally apply as the discriminating norm:

9(9²+1)/2 = #369

to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence can
define factual existence:

n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}

That given the notion of *OUSIA* (Greek: οὐσία) which is analogous to the
English concepts of being and *ONTIC* used in contemporary philosophy.
*OUSIA* is translated as Latin substantia and essentia, and hence to
English as substance and essence.

END EXCERPT

THEREFORE YOU OUGHT REFRAIN FROM ANY FURTHER #432 - DISHEARTENING ACTS OF
CYBER WARFARE AS ANONYMOUS INTERNET MILITIA BEING INTENTIONAL CONDUCT OF
DEHUMANISING #325 - DETRUDE AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AS CONSTITUTING WAR
CRIMES.

THIS NOTE WILL BE FORWARDED WITH EACH COMPLIANT MADE AGAINST YOUR PERVERSE
AND DEPRAVED INDOLENT LIFE OF *PSYCHOSIS* AMOUNTING AS NOTHING MORE THAN
*CHILD* *BEARING* *WITH* *IGNORANCE* *AS* *A* *CONGENITAL* *BIRTH*
*DEFECT*, *HEDONISM* *AND* *TAX* *FRAUD*.

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Hey Dolf the
retard stop sending me e-mails. You are a idiot. You can't sue someone for
saying you are a idiot it isn't a war crime.”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “OBAMACARE CASE STUDY ON WET NOODLE
POLITICS BY DEMOCRATS (I NEVER HAD SEX WITH THAT WOMAN BUT MY EDICT BY MY
OWN BIBLE SWEARING OATH HAND WAS AS *SELFIE* UPON HER DRESS)

— HOITY-TOITY JERK —

“KERNEL SINCE PLEASANCE IS UGLY.
TAKE A DO IT YOURSELF APPROACH.
AS INDIFFERENCE TO HER FUGLY.
AND BY ALL MEANS A REPROACH.

MAKE HER CLEAN UP THE MESS.
DON’T BLOW DRY AS HER FANNY.
PRESIDENTIAL EDICT ON HER DRESS.
SINCE YOUR PRICK IS TEENY WEENY.”

OBAMACARE ESTABLISHED: March 23, 2010; 8 years ago

Most major provisions phased in by January 2014; remaining provisions
phased in by 2020; individual mandate repealed starting 2019

Barack Hussein Obama II (born August 4, 1961) is an American attorney and
politician who served as the 44th President of the United States from
January 20, 2009, to January 20, 2017.

A member of the Democratic Party, he was the first African American to
serve as president. He was previously a United States Senator from Illinois
and a member of the Illinois State Senate.”

ALLEGORICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE BIBLICAL NARRATIVES
"Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to
you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe.

Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.

For we are the *CIRCUMCISION*, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice
in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.

Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh
that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:

*CIRCUMCISED* the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of
Benjamin {son of the right hand}, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the
law, a Pharisee {set apart}; Concerning zeal, persecuting the church {#509
- *YAHAD* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLLS* *COMMUNITY* *AS* *BEING* *SABBATH*
*OBSERVANT* *JEWISH* *CHRISTIANS* [Acts 9:1-5; 28:17-22; Hebrews 6:1-20]};
touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless." [Philippians
3:1-6 (KJV)]

“But the Pharisees and *LAWYERS* rejected the counsel of God {ie. *I*
*SWEAR* *BY* *ALMIGHTY* *GOD* *INDEED*} against themselves, being not
baptized {ie. #HE {#5} ASSIGNED TO EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN GOVERNANCE
PROTOTYPE #TWO: #102 / #306; TORAH: #141 (#423) + #132 (#396) = #273
(#819)} of him.” [Luke 7:30 (KJV)]

G2671@{
   #1: Sup: 20; Ego: 20,
   #2: Sup: 21; Ego: 1,
   #3: Sup: 78; Ego: 57,
   #4: Sup: 79; Ego: 1,
   #5: Sup: 17; Ego: 19,
   #6: Sup: 18; Ego: 1,
   #7: Sup: 68; Ego: 50,
   Male: #301; Feme: #149
} // #473

#473 as [#20, #1, #300, #1, #100, #1, #50] = katara (G2671): {#13 as #423}
1) an execration, imprecation, *CURSE*;

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “Your wet noodle has pissed itself.”

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Aussies call
Americans septic and yet they have you the average Aussie?”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “It has taken me only two phone calls
and five emails to set in motion that which would make OBAMACARE be
regarded as insignificant much like the person whom brought it into being.

THAT LOUD MOUTHED SILVER-TONGUED HOITY-TOITY JERK OF A LAWYER BARACK OBAMA
OUGHT TO KNOW WITH REGARDS TO HIS ABHORRENT OATH TAKING: “...Thou shalt not
take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him
guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus 20:7 (KJV)]

THAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS SOMETHING AS A LAW ABOUT WHAT GOD CONSIDERS OF
HIMSELF AND NOT JUST ANY MISCONCEPTION OF HIM WHICH WE AS VANITY HOLD TO BE
TRUE: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their *Creator* with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

BARACK OBAMA IS WITHIN MY VIEW IN RELATION TO #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 AND
HIS VAIN OATHS TO THE CREATOR IS GUILTY OF A CRIME:

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>

#YOD {10 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#MEM {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU - CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH {23 CHROMOSOMES}

ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.

... I want to make sure for the purposes of *DAMAGES* *COMPENSATION* that
it is known your mind encapsulation by education or lack there of being a
worldview which ought to be viewed as the impetus for prejudiced gratuitous
enjoyment in breaches of the law of Lex Scantinia, as otherwise needlessly
bringing my name and family reputation as racial / religious heritage into
dis-repute or infamia as a loss of legal or social standing.

REPLY #1 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "MACRON URGES FRENCH
YOUTH TO TAKE UP MAKEUP CLASSES"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Cosmeticus.pdf>

REPLY #2 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "HYPOTEÍNOUSA: (rarely:
hypothenuse) TO HYPOTHESISE BY RATIOCINATION WITHIN MEASURED BOUNDS OF
DIVISION WITHOUT AN INCOMMENSURATE BIAS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Hypoteinousa.pdf>

REPLY #3 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "YOU WILL BE GETTING
#168 - CONDEMNATION UPON THIS CENTENARY REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY 11
NOVEMBER 2018!"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Years%20Condemn.pdf>

REPLY #4 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "FACILITATING COGNITIVE
CONSONANCE AND AVOIDING DISSONANCE AS PERCEPTIONS OF REALITY"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Reality.pdf>

REPLY #5 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “*ANZACS* *WHAT* *FOR*
(*REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* *DAY* 11 NOVEMBER *CENTENNIAL* #168 -
*CONDEMNATION*)?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/What%20For.pdf>

REPLY #6 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “STATEMENT OF COMPLAINT
OVER CONSIDERATIONS OF WAR CRIMES BY AMERICAN INTERNET MILITIA BEING
BREACHES OF 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/US%20CONSULATE%20COMPLAINT%2020180716.pdf>

- dolf
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
MattB
2018-07-20 22:18:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
retard stop sending me e-mails. You are a idiot. You can't sue someone for
saying you are a idiot it isn't a war crime.”
That is true. Still waiting to be served by a real court. Guess you
are a average Aussie?
dolf
2018-07-21 02:59:29 UTC
Permalink
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#314 / #335} / HETEROS {#422 / #308} / TORAH {#420 /
#307}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:5,row:3,col:2,nous:57&idea:{m,169}&idea:{f,201}&idea:{m,314}&idea:{f,335}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 5, row: 3, col: 2, nous: 57 [Date: 2018.7.21, Super: #314 /
#39 - Achieving Oneness, Root of Order; I-Ching: H28 - Major Superiority,
Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance of the great, Great surpassing,
Critical mass; Tetra: 76 - Aggravation, Ego: #335 / #57 - Laissez Faire
Politics, Simplicity In Habits; I-Ching: H37 - The Family (the clan),
Dwelling People, Family members; Tetra: 39 - Residence]

Further to my emailed submissions of 17 to 20 JULY 2018 made to the
Financial Services Royal Commission which were copied to you and over which
you have a legal accountability to clarify the Insurer's unlawful conduct,
and as provision of a summary of those truthful, factual and mathematical
statements I enclose herewith a letter dated 20 JULY 2018 as made to my
family members within the NEDERLANDS seeking written confirmation that "I
provided each of you with a laminated A2 (420 x 594 mm) preliminary matrix
to my GRAPPLE paradigm on the notion of INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS:


#4 x 5 minutes = 20 minutes as strata of temporality: #1440 / #72 -
ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE = 20 minutes

For safe keeping in relation to my then anti-terrorism activism following
the #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 TERRORIST EVENT."

That letter is enclosed for your information over confirmation given as
allegations of unlawful actions by your legal counsel Mr. Peter Riddell and
claims assessors subsequent... I want to make sure for the purposes of
*DAMAGES* *COMPENSATION* given Mr. Peter Riddell's conduct as misconceived
ILLEGALITY DEFENCE has by a LACK OF PRIVACY ACCORDED TO ME BY THE VCAT
HEARING that I have been subsequently subject to relentless PUBLIC SCORN
due to the mind encapsulation of persons whether by education or lack there
of being a worldview which ought to be viewed as the impetus for prejudiced
gratuitous enjoyment in breaches of the Roman legal principle of Lex
Scantinia, as otherwise needlessly bringing my name and family reputation
as racial / religious heritage into dis-repute or infamia as a loss of
legal or social standing.

[snipped for context]

I will tell you a little story which happened yesterday:

***@zen: 4, row: 3, col: 2, nous: 78 [Date: 2018.7.20, Super: #363 /
#77 - Natural Guide, Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction,
Standstill (stagnation), Selfish persons; Tetra: 57 - Guardedness, Ego:
#396 / #78 - Recognizing Fidelity, Trust in Faith; I-Ching: H59 -
Dispersion, Dispersal (dissolution); Tetra: 47 - Pattern]

I was returning to a business where I had inadvertently left a copy of a
letter sent to my relatives pertaining to a submission made earlier to the
Financial Services Royal Commission and the need to obtain from them a
written confirmation (at least) that I had 15 years ago sent to them for
safe keeping an A2 laminated 4 x 5 minutes = 20 minutes x #72 = #1440
minutes per day as prototype to my Grapple trinomial mathematical
theoretical noumenon (cf: Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason published
1781 / 1787).

He said that his dog was a little pensive.  And I said looking at and
patting the little mutt that there was thunder / lightning strikes coming.

And there was 90 minutes later some thunder which began @ 1709 hours.

HE SAID: “You were correct again.”

I REPLIED: “And the attribute for that event was:

#334 as [#6, #80, #200, #8, #40] = perach (H6525): {UMBRA: #10 as #288 %
#41 = #1} 1) bud, sprout

The name on the letter which I had left there was SPRUIT which is SPROUT in
Dutch.”

It was an ‘OTH sign as DIVINE stamp of approval...
Post by MattB
Post by dolf
retard stop sending me e-mails. You are a idiot. You can't sue someone for
saying you are a idiot it isn't a war crime.”
That is true. Still waiting to be served by a real court. Guess you
are a average Aussie?
— [DRAFT] AUNTIE ARNIE’S [roo]TED LECTURES ON WET NOODLE USA DEMOCRATS
PARTY 🎉 POLITICS

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 21 July, 2018

You were saying about wet noodle politics?

YOUR DIALOG IS AS IRRATIONAL AS ARNOLD'S INFIDELITY (ie. A TESTIMONY OF
VOWS TO GOD AND BEFORE MAN) IS NOT A WHOLESOME EXAMPLE FOR AN ATHEIST TO
USE AND NEITHER HIS BLISTERING SCREWED UP FACE WHICH IS EITHER A PRODUCT OF
EXCESSIVE SUN LAMP USE OR KAPOSI SARCOMA LESIONS LIKE GERRYMANDER ON A MAP
IS NOW THE RESULT...

YOUTUBE: “Wet Noodle Selfies”

http://youtu.be/zsGwdhTFaJI

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL @ 1107 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Just to be
clear, is tax fraud a war crime?

Also, I know I saw [this] documentary some time back about how Arnold
Schwarzeneger figured out how a bloke can bear a child, but I am 99.99%
certain that I cannot do so myself.

I'm also unclear on why child bearing is a war crime, or maybe you aren't
referring to the laws on Planet Earth, but to those that pertain on Planet
Poofter?”

— MY TR[I]UMP[HANT] MAN-CHOO —

“HE IS A BILLIONAIRE.
BUT WE THE MEANS.
AND TECHNO-WARE.
SHAFT YOUR SPLEEN {bad temper; spite}.
WITH WANTON CARE.
A $6 *MILL* CLEAN.
HIS TOOL TO BARE.”

I hope that Americans are not going to accuse me of election interference.

Q. What is a “cesspool of political bias”?

A. Essentially it is a mafia {ie. any small powerful or influential #123 -
GROUP in an #369 - ORGANISATION or field; clique} which places a
prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct {#78
/ #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable
collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} by conduct of detrude.

-- TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] --

"TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.

MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN'S THRONE.
JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
AGAINST HEAVEN'S SON FIRSTBORN.

NONE DENY HOLOCAUST'S CAUSE.
JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW*}."

DOLF: “*CEASE* *YOUR* *DERANGED* *ATTACKS* *BOTH* *PUBLICLY* *AND* *BY*
*PRIVATE* *EMAILS*

ALL YOUR PRIVATE 24 EMAILS AS IRRATIONAL ONE LINE RESPONSES:

/unsubscribe gibberish

MADE TO MY MATERIA PRIMA IN PREPARATION FOR A RATIONAL ARGUMENT AS 17 to 20
JULY 2018 SUBMISSIONS MADE TO THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION /
ATTORNEY GENERALS STATE & FEDERAL / SENATOR PENNY WONG WILL BE FORWARDED
WITH THIS NOTE:

BEGIN EXCERPT: That the Financial Services Royal Commission are going to
become aware that the Insurer in relation to my salary continuance claim
and the extraordinary VCAT Hearing of 7 December 2001 of their
representations being PERJURY and lies in relation my involvement (ie. I
had 4 x 5 minutes = 20 minutes as strata of temporality: #1440 / #72 -
ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE = 20 minutes) within Anti-terrorism activism and #288 -
11 SEPTEMBER 2001 TERRORIST EVENT which is clearly conveyed within my 2
courtesy telephone calls as that which they maliciously misrepresented and
as contempt not accountable for:

#419 - KILL THE SOUL
#390 - GRAVE ROBBERS {WREATHS / CROWN: 4 JULY / ZION: monument; raised up;
sepulcher = GRAVE
#288 - UMBRA / TERRORIST EVENT: 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 / BEERSHEBA {OATH}

WHEN I SAY THAT I HAVE A TRANSCENDENT NATURAL / COMMON LAW CLAIM TO
HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF IT RELATES TO THE METAPHYSICAL
BASIS OF THE ECONOMY ITSELF WHICH IS *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 / #288} *TO*
*EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES*
#EIGHT: #120 / #360 AND THAT IS A CONCERN TO ROYAL COMMISSION INTO
FINANCIAL SERVICES AND ALL ABOUT:

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <-- *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
#288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <-- *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345 /
#405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #334 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching:
H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 -
Departure;

THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; *I* *AM* *NOT* *FRAUDULENT* *IN* *MEASURES* *OF* *GRAIN*.

#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182 <-- MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315 *AND* *TORAH*
*PROTOTYPE* #EIGHT: #141 / #423

<-- *LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364)
+ #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of
Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5 as
#19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

Just an *ONTIC* CENTRE OF VALUE comment on the TIME OF THE AFFIRMATION
OCCURRING AT THE VCAT HEARING UPON 7 DECEMBER 2001 WHICH IS APPLICABLE TO
THE HETEROS TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE that may be hosted upon my noumenon AS
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY for THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS (ie.
VOLUNTARY WILL) and its association then to IMPROPRIETY as CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING #168 / #334 / #342 WHICH *IS* *MAPPED* *TO* TWEEDLEDUM[B]
#FIVE: #114 / #342 AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] HETEROS #SIX: #114 / #342

VCAT AFFIRMATION{4.4.7.53.1}@{
@1: Sup: 59 (#59); Ego: 59 (#59),
@2: Sup: 10 (#69); Ego: 32 (#91),
@3: Sup: 23 (#92); Ego: 13 (#104),
@4: Sup: 76 (#168 *** ONTIC VALUE CONDEMNATION AS #237 - USE OF FORCE
TEMPLATE DOCUMENT OF EASTER ON 4 APRIL 2007 TO PSYCHIATRIST KEK); Ego: 53
(#157),
@5: Sup: 53 (#221); Ego: 58 (#215),
@6: Sup: 71 (#292); Ego: 18 (#233),
@7: Sup: 6 (#298); Ego: 16 (#249),
@8: Sup: 36 (#334 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD); Ego: 30 (#279),
@9: Sup: 8 (#342 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD / @215 - HITLER TABLE TALK ON
BIBLE STUDENTS AND ADMISSIBILITY OF SUCH AS METAPHYSICS / METEMPIRICAL
JURISPRUDENCE TO THE VCAT HEARING); Ego: 53 (#332),
Male: #342; Feme: #332
}

Within philosophy, *ONTIC* (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: "of that
which is") is physical, real, or factual existence. The British
philosopher Roy Bhaskar (15 May 1944 – 19 November 2014), who was closely
associated with the philosophical movement of Critical Realism writes:

"I differentiate the '*ONTIC*' ('*ONTICAL*' etc.) from the 'ontological'. I
employ the former to refer to:

#1) whatever pertains to being generally [SUCH AS THE THOTH MEASURES AS
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES}], rather than
some distinctively philosophical (or scientific) theory of it (ontology),
so that in this sense, that of the *ONTIC*, we can speak of the *ONTIC*
presuppositions of a work of art, a joke or a strike as much as a theory of
knowledge [IN THEIR BEING ESSENTIAL RATIOCINATION QUANTITATIVE AND
CANONICAL CONSIDERATIONS AS META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES CIRCUMSCRIBING
LANGUAGE EPISTEMOLOGY]; and, within this rubric, to

#2) the intransitive objects of some specific, historically determinate,
scientific investigation (or set of such investigations [OF TEMPORAL
DISTINCTIONS]), the *ONTIC*.

Professor Ruth Groff (Political Science department at Saint Louis
University, St. Louis, Missouri) offers this expansion of Bhaskar's note
above:

"The *ONTIC* is always specified, and only identified, by its relation, as
the intransitive object(s) of some or other (denumerable set of) particular
transitive process(es) of enquiry. It is cognitive process-, and
level-specific; whereas the ontological (like the *ONTIC*) is not."

Thusly Ontoticism or onticism is the philosophical branch of ontology which
studies the factual existence.

The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
definition of *SAPIENT* that can equally apply as the discriminating norm:

9(9²+1)/2 = #369

to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence can
define factual existence:

n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}

That given the notion of *OUSIA* (Greek: οὐσία) which is analogous to the
English concepts of being and *ONTIC* used in contemporary philosophy.
*OUSIA* is translated as Latin substantia and essentia, and hence to
English as substance and essence.

END EXCERPT

THEREFORE YOU OUGHT REFRAIN FROM ANY FURTHER #432 - DISHEARTENING ACTS OF
CYBER WARFARE AS ANONYMOUS INTERNET MILITIA BEING INTENTIONAL CONDUCT OF
DEHUMANISING #325 - DETRUDE AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AS CONSTITUTING WAR
CRIMES.

THIS NOTE WILL BE FORWARDED WITH EACH COMPLIANT MADE AGAINST YOUR PERVERSE
AND DEPRAVED INDOLENT LIFE OF *PSYCHOSIS* AMOUNTING AS NOTHING MORE THAN
*CHILD* *BEARING* *WITH* *IGNORANCE* *AS* *A* *CONGENITAL* *BIRTH*
*DEFECT*, *HEDONISM* *AND* *TAX* *FRAUD*.

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Hey Dolf the
retard stop sending me e-mails. You are a idiot. You can't sue someone for
saying you are a idiot it isn't a war crime.”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “OBAMACARE CASE STUDY ON WET NOODLE
POLITICS BY DEMOCRATS (I NEVER HAD SEX WITH THAT WOMAN BUT MY EDICT BY MY
OWN BIBLE SWEARING OATH HAND WAS AS *SELFIE* UPON HER DRESS)

— HOITY-TOITY JERK —

“KERNEL SINCE PLEASANCE IS UGLY.
TAKE A DO IT YOURSELF APPROACH.
AS INDIFFERENCE TO HER FUGLY.
AND BY ALL MEANS A REPROACH.

MAKE HER CLEAN UP THE MESS.
DON’T BLOW DRY AS HER FANNY.
PRESIDENTIAL EDICT ON HER DRESS.
SINCE YOUR PRICK IS TEENY WEENY.”

OBAMACARE FACTS ESTABLISHED: March 23, 2010; 8 years ago

Most major provisions phased in by January 2014; remaining provisions
phased in by 2020; individual mandate repealed starting 2019

Barack Hussein Obama II (born August 4, 1961) is an American attorney and
politician who served as the 44th President of the United States from
January 20, 2009, to January 20, 2017.

A member of the Democratic Party, he was the first African American to
serve as president. He was previously a United States Senator from Illinois
and a member of the Illinois State Senate.”

ALLEGORICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE BIBLICAL NARRATIVES
"Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to
you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe.

Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.

For we are the *CIRCUMCISION*, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice
in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.

Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh
that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:

*CIRCUMCISED* the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of
Benjamin {son of the right hand}, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the
law, a Pharisee {set apart}; Concerning zeal, persecuting the church {#509
- *YAHAD* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLLS* *COMMUNITY* *AS* *BEING* *SABBATH*
*OBSERVANT* *JEWISH* *CHRISTIANS* [Acts 9:1-5; 28:17-22; Hebrews 6:1-20]};
touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless." [Philippians
3:1-6 (KJV)]

“But the Pharisees and *LAWYERS* rejected the counsel of God {ie. *I*
*SWEAR* *BY* *ALMIGHTY* *GOD* *INDEED*} against themselves, being not
baptized {ie. #HE {#5} ASSIGNED TO EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN GOVERNANCE
PROTOTYPE #TWO: #102 / #306; TORAH: #141 (#423) + #132 (#396) = #273
(#819)} of him.” [Luke 7:30 (KJV)]

G2671@{
   #1: Sup: 20; Ego: 20,
   #2: Sup: 21; Ego: 1,
   #3: Sup: 78; Ego: 57,
   #4: Sup: 79; Ego: 1,
   #5: Sup: 17; Ego: 19,
   #6: Sup: 18; Ego: 1,
   #7: Sup: 68; Ego: 50,
   Male: #301; Feme: #149
} // #473

#473 as [#20, #1, #300, #1, #100, #1, #50] = katara (G2671): {#13 as #423}
1) an execration, imprecation, *CURSE*;

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “Your wet noodle has pissed itself.”

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Aussies call
Americans septic and yet they have you the average Aussie?”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “It has taken me only two phone calls
and five emails to set in motion that which would make OBAMACARE be
regarded as insignificant much like the person whom brought it into being.

THAT LOUD MOUTHED SILVER-TONGUED HOITY-TOITY JERK OF A LAWYER BARACK OBAMA
OUGHT TO KNOW WITH REGARDS TO HIS ABHORRENT OATH TAKING: “...Thou shalt not
take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him
guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus 20:7 (KJV)]

THAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS SOMETHING AS A LAW ABOUT WHAT GOD CONSIDERS OF
HIMSELF AND NOT JUST ANY MISCONCEPTION OF HIM WHICH WE AS VANITY HOLD TO BE
TRUE: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their *CREATOR* with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

BARACK OBAMA IS WITHIN MY VIEW IN RELATION TO #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 AND
HIS VAIN OATHS TO THE CREATOR IS GUILTY OF A CRIME:

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>

#YOD {10 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#MEM {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU - CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH {23 CHROMOSOMES}

ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.

... I want to make sure for the purposes of *DAMAGES* *COMPENSATION* that
it is known your mind encapsulation by education or lack there of being a
worldview which ought to be viewed as the impetus for prejudiced gratuitous
enjoyment in breaches of the law of Lex Scantinia, as otherwise needlessly
bringing my name and family reputation as racial / religious heritage into
dis-repute or infamia as a loss of legal or social standing.

REPLY #1 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "MACRON URGES FRENCH
YOUTH TO TAKE UP MAKEUP CLASSES"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Cosmeticus.pdf>

REPLY #2 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "HYPOTEÍNOUSA: (rarely:
hypothenuse) TO HYPOTHESISE BY RATIOCINATION WITHIN MEASURED BOUNDS OF
DIVISION WITHOUT AN INCOMMENSURATE BIAS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Hypoteinousa.pdf>

REPLY #3 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "YOU WILL BE GETTING
#168 - CONDEMNATION UPON THIS CENTENARY REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY 11
NOVEMBER 2018!"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Years%20Condemn.pdf>

REPLY #4 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "FACILITATING COGNITIVE
CONSONANCE AND AVOIDING DISSONANCE AS PERCEPTIONS OF REALITY"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Reality.pdf>

REPLY #5 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “*ANZACS* *WHAT* *FOR*
(*REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* *DAY* 11 NOVEMBER *CENTENNIAL* #168 -
*CONDEMNATION*)?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/What%20For.pdf>

REPLY #6 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “STATEMENT OF COMPLAINT
OVER CONSIDERATIONS OF WAR CRIMES BY AMERICAN INTERNET MILITIA BEING
BREACHES OF 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/US%20CONSULATE%20COMPLAINT%2020180716.pdf>

- dolf

Initial Post: 21 July 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-07-21 23:04:22 UTC
Permalink
— AUNTIE ARNIE’S [roo]TED LECTURES ON WET NOODLE USA DEMOCRATS PARTY 🎉
POLITICS

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 22 July, 2018

You were saying about wet noodle politics?

YOUTUBE: "Who Is It (Michael Jackson)"



YOUR DIALOG IS AS IRRATIONAL AS ARNOLD'S INFIDELITY (ie. A TESTIMONY OF
VOWS TO GOD AND BEFORE MAN) IS NOT A WHOLESOME EXAMPLE FOR AN ATHEIST TO
USE AND NEITHER HIS BLISTERING SCREWED UP FACE WHICH IS EITHER A PRODUCT
OF EXCESSIVE SUN LAMP USE OR KAPOSI SARCOMA LESIONS LIKE GERRYMANDER ON
A MAP IS NOW THE RESULT...

YOUTUBE: “Wet Noodle Selfies”

http://youtu.be/zsGwdhTFaJI

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL @ 1107 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Just to be
clear, is tax fraud a war crime?

Also, I know I saw [this] documentary some time back about how Arnold
Schwarzeneger figured out how a bloke can bear a child, but I am 99.99%
certain that I cannot do so myself.

I'm also unclear on why child bearing is a war crime, or maybe you
aren't referring to the laws on Planet Earth, but to those that pertain
on Planet Poofter?”

— MY TR[I]UMP[HANT] MAN-CHOO —

“HE IS A BILLIONAIRE.
BUT WE THE MEANS.
AND TECHNO-WARE.
SHAFT YOUR SPLEEN {bad temper; spite}.
WITH WANTON CARE.
A $6 *MILL* CLEAN.
HIS TOOL TO BARE.”

YOUTUBE: "U Can't Touch This (MC Hammer)



I hope that Americans are not going to accuse me of election interference.

Q. What is a “cesspool of political bias”?

A. Essentially it is a mafia {ie. any small powerful or influential #123
- GROUP in an #369 - ORGANISATION or field; clique} which places a
prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct
{#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable
collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} by conduct of detrude.

-- TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] --

"TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.

MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN'S THRONE.
JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
AGAINST HEAVEN'S SON FIRSTBORN.

NONE DENY HOLOCAUST'S CAUSE.
JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW*}."

DOLF: “*CEASE* *YOUR* *DERANGED* *ATTACKS* *BOTH* *PUBLICLY* *AND* *BY*
*PRIVATE* *EMAILS*

ALL YOUR PRIVATE 24 EMAILS AS IRRATIONAL ONE LINE RESPONSES:

/unsubscribe gibberish

MADE TO MY MATERIA PRIMA IN PREPARATION FOR A RATIONAL ARGUMENT AS 17 to
20 JULY 2018 SUBMISSIONS MADE TO THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION
/ ATTORNEY GENERALS STATE & FEDERAL / SENATOR PENNY WONG WILL BE
FORWARDED WITH THIS NOTE:

BEGIN EXCERPT: That the Financial Services Royal Commission are going to
become aware that the Insurer in relation to my salary continuance claim
and the extraordinary VCAT Hearing of 7 December 2001 of their
representations being PERJURY and lies in relation my involvement (ie. I
had 4 x 5 minutes = 20 minutes as strata of temporality: #1440 / #72 -
ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE = 20 minutes) within Anti-terrorism activism and
#288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 TERRORIST EVENT which is clearly conveyed
within my 2 courtesy telephone calls as that which they maliciously
misrepresented and as contempt not accountable for:

#419 - KILL THE SOUL
#390 - GRAVE ROBBERS {WREATHS / CROWN: 4 JULY / ZION: monument; raised
up; sepulcher = GRAVE
#288 - UMBRA / TERRORIST EVENT: 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 / BEERSHEBA {OATH}

WHEN I SAY THAT I HAVE A TRANSCENDENT NATURAL / COMMON LAW CLAIM TO
HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF IT RELATES TO THE
METAPHYSICAL BASIS OF THE ECONOMY ITSELF WHICH IS *MAPPED* {#120 / #224
/ #288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360 AND THAT IS A CONCERN TO
ROYAL COMMISSION INTO FINANCIAL SERVICES AND ALL ABOUT:

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <-- *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
#288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <-- *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES
{#345 / #405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #334 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form;
I-Ching: H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence;
Tetra: 66 - Departure;

THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; *I* *AM* *NOT* *FRAUDULENT* *IN* *MEASURES* *OF* *GRAIN*.

#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182 <-- MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315 *AND*
*TORAH* *PROTOTYPE* #EIGHT: #141 / #423

<-- *LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 *
#364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox
of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5
as #19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

Just an *ONTIC* CENTRE OF VALUE comment on the TIME OF THE AFFIRMATION
OCCURRING AT THE VCAT HEARING UPON 7 DECEMBER 2001 WHICH IS APPLICABLE
TO THE HETEROS TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE that may be hosted upon my
noumenon AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY for THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTUS (ie. VOLUNTARY WILL) and its association then to IMPROPRIETY
as CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING #168 / #334 / #342 WHICH *IS* *MAPPED*
*TO* TWEEDLEDUM[B] #FIVE: #114 / #342 AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] HETEROS #SIX:
#114 / #342

VCAT AFFIRMATION{4.4.7.53.1}@{
@1: Sup: 59 (#59); Ego: 59 (#59),
@2: Sup: 10 (#69); Ego: 32 (#91),
@3: Sup: 23 (#92); Ego: 13 (#104),
@4: Sup: 76 (#168 *** ONTIC VALUE CONDEMNATION AS #237 - USE OF
FORCE TEMPLATE DOCUMENT OF EASTER ON 4 APRIL 2007 TO PSYCHIATRIST KEK);
Ego: 53 (#157),
@5: Sup: 53 (#221); Ego: 58 (#215),
@6: Sup: 71 (#292); Ego: 18 (#233),
@7: Sup: 6 (#298); Ego: 16 (#249),
@8: Sup: 36 (#334 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD); Ego: 30 (#279),
@9: Sup: 8 (#342 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD / @215 - HITLER TABLE TALK
ON BIBLE STUDENTS AND ADMISSIBILITY OF SUCH AS METAPHYSICS /
METEMPIRICAL JURISPRUDENCE TO THE VCAT HEARING); Ego: 53 (#332),
Male: #342; Feme: #332
}

Within philosophy, *ONTIC* (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: "of that
which is") is physical, real, or factual existence. The British
philosopher Roy Bhaskar (15 May 1944 – 19 November 2014), who was
closely associated with the philosophical movement of Critical Realism
writes:

"I differentiate the '*ONTIC*' ('*ONTICAL*' etc.) from the
'ontological'. I employ the former to refer to:

#1) whatever pertains to being generally [SUCH AS THE THOTH MEASURES AS
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES}], rather
than some distinctively philosophical (or scientific) theory of it
(ontology), so that in this sense, that of the *ONTIC*, we can speak of
the *ONTIC* presuppositions of a work of art, a joke or a strike as much
as a theory of knowledge [IN THEIR BEING ESSENTIAL RATIOCINATION
QUANTITATIVE AND CANONICAL CONSIDERATIONS AS META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES
CIRCUMSCRIBING LANGUAGE EPISTEMOLOGY]; and, within this rubric, to

#2) the intransitive objects of some specific, historically determinate,
scientific investigation (or set of such investigations [OF TEMPORAL
DISTINCTIONS]), the *ONTIC*.

Professor Ruth Groff (Political Science department at Saint Louis
University, St. Louis, Missouri) offers this expansion of Bhaskar's note
above:

"The *ONTIC* is always specified, and only identified, by its relation,
as the intransitive object(s) of some or other (denumerable set of)
particular transitive process(es) of enquiry. It is cognitive process-,
and level-specific; whereas the ontological (like the *ONTIC*) is not."

Thusly Ontoticism or onticism is the philosophical branch of ontology
which studies the factual existence.

The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
definition of *SAPIENT* that can equally apply as the discriminating norm:

9(9²+1)/2 = #369

to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence can
define factual existence:

n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}

That given the notion of *OUSIA* (Greek: οὐσία) which is analogous to
the English concepts of being and *ONTIC* used in contemporary
philosophy. *OUSIA* is translated as Latin substantia and essentia, and
hence to English as substance and essence.

END EXCERPT

THEREFORE YOU OUGHT REFRAIN FROM ANY FURTHER #432 - DISHEARTENING ACTS
OF CYBER WARFARE AS ANONYMOUS INTERNET MILITIA BEING INTENTIONAL CONDUCT
OF DEHUMANISING #325 - DETRUDE AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AS
CONSTITUTING WAR CRIMES.

THIS NOTE WILL BE FORWARDED WITH EACH COMPLIANT MADE AGAINST YOUR
PERVERSE AND DEPRAVED INDOLENT LIFE OF *PSYCHOSIS* AMOUNTING AS NOTHING
MORE THAN *CHILD* *BEARING* *WITH* *IGNORANCE* *AS* *A* *CONGENITAL*
*BIRTH* *DEFECT*, *HEDONISM* *AND* *TAX* *FRAUD*.

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Hey Dolf
the retard stop sending me e-mails. You are a idiot. You can't sue
someone for saying you are a idiot it isn't a war crime.”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “OBAMACARE CASE STUDY ON WET NOODLE
POLITICS BY DEMOCRATS (I NEVER HAD SEX WITH THAT WOMAN BUT MY EDICT BY
MY OWN BIBLE SWEARING OATH HAND WAS AS *SELFIE* UPON HER DRESS)

— HOITY-TOITY JERK —

“KERNEL SINCE PLEASANCE IS UGLY.
TAKE A DO IT YOURSELF APPROACH.
AS INDIFFERENCE TO HER FUGLY.
AND BY ALL MEANS A REPROACH.

MAKE HER CLEAN UP THE MESS.
DON’T BLOW DRY AS HER FANNY.
PRESIDENTIAL EDICT ON HER DRESS.
SINCE YOUR PRICK IS TEENY WEENY.”

YOUTUBE: "Give In To Me (Michael Jackson)"



Lord of the Flies is a 1954 novel by Nobel Prize–winning British author
William Golding. The book focuses on a group of British boys stranded on
an uninhabited island and their disastrous attempt to govern themselves.

<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_of_the_Flies>

OBAMACARE FACTS ESTABLISHED: March 23, 2010; 8 years ago

Most major provisions phased in by January 2014; remaining provisions
phased in by 2020; individual mandate repealed starting 2019

Barack Hussein Obama II (born August 4, 1961) is an American attorney
and politician who served as the 44th President of the United States
from January 20, 2009, to January 20, 2017.

A member of the Democratic Party, he was the first African American to
serve as president. He was previously a United States Senator from
Illinois and a member of the Illinois State Senate.”

ALLEGORICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE BIBLICAL NARRATIVES
"Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to
you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe.

Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.

For we are the *CIRCUMCISION*, which worship God in the spirit, and
rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.

Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man
thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:

*CIRCUMCISED* the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of
Benjamin {son of the right hand}, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching
the law, a Pharisee {set apart}; Concerning zeal, persecuting the church
{#509 - *YAHAD* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLLS* *COMMUNITY* *AS* *BEING*
*SABBATH* *OBSERVANT* *JEWISH* *CHRISTIANS* [Acts 9:1-5; 28:17-22;
Hebrews 6:1-20]}; touching the righteousness which is in the law,
blameless." [Philippians 3:1-6 (KJV)]

“But the Pharisees and *LAWYERS* rejected the counsel of God {ie. *I*
*SWEAR* *BY* *ALMIGHTY* *GOD* *INDEED*} against themselves, being not
baptized {ie. #HE {#5} ASSIGNED TO EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN GOVERNANCE
PROTOTYPE #TWO: #102 / #306; TORAH: #141 (#423) + #132 (#396) = #273
(#819)} of him.” [Luke 7:30 (KJV)]

G2671@{
#1: Sup: 20; Ego: 20,
#2: Sup: 21; Ego: 1,
#3: Sup: 78; Ego: 57,
#4: Sup: 79; Ego: 1,
#5: Sup: 17; Ego: 19,
#6: Sup: 18; Ego: 1,
#7: Sup: 68; Ego: 50,
Male: #301; Feme: #149
} // #473

#473 as [#20, #1, #300, #1, #100, #1, #50] = katara (G2671): {#13 as
#423} 1) an execration, imprecation, *CURSE*;

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “Your wet noodle has pissed itself.”

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Aussies
call Americans septic and yet they have you the average Aussie?”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “It has taken me only two phone calls
and five emails to set in motion that which would make OBAMACARE be
regarded as insignificant much like the person whom brought it into being.

THAT LOUD MOUTHED SILVER-TONGUED HOITY-TOITY JERK OF A LAWYER BARACK
OBAMA OUGHT TO KNOW WITH REGARDS TO HIS ABHORRENT OATH TAKING: “...Thou
shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will
not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus 20:7 (KJV)]

THAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS SOMETHING AS A LAW ABOUT WHAT GOD CONSIDERS OF
HIMSELF AND NOT JUST ANY MISCONCEPTION OF HIM WHICH WE AS VANITY HOLD TO
BE TRUE: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are
created equal, that they are endowed by their *CREATOR* with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit
of Happiness.”

Let’s see:

1ST amendment about the Creator...

Doesn’t comply

2ND amendment about any “regulated militia”

Doesn’t comply

Fears the enemy within as your psychosis as personified by Homosexuals
or Russians

Okay we have the picture.

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0647 HOURS ON 22 JULY 2018: "AMERICAN
MAGGOTRY: (LORD OF THE FLIES): "Russians? What I have read you Aussies
have a problem with China. Me I ignore much of the liberal BS. Russia
may have put out false information they did not hack the voting machines
and so many liberals are so stupid they don't know the difference. Wait
by liberal I mean far left and socialist.

You still haven't told me what court had jurisdiction here, that you
will be using?

Come on you can do it."

DOLF @ 0900 HOURS ON 22 JULY 2018: "THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION FOR
STARTERS:

YOUTUBE: "Men in Black All Neuralizer Scenes"



By knowing that the ONTIC (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: "of that
which is") mathematical parameters which are prerequisite to what which
is physical, real, or factual to existence and are as A PRIORI entirely
within our domain of providence an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as trinomial
mathematical theoretical noumenon, we may thereby through NEURAL
LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING immediately have access to the minds of some
503,280,114 persons:

U Can't Touch This- 415,950,495 views
Who Is It - 20,867,266 views
Give In To Me - 66,462,353 views"

BARACK OBAMA IS WITHIN MY VIEW IN RELATION TO #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
AND HIS VAIN OATHS TO THE CREATOR IS GUILTY OF A CRIME:

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>

#YOD {10 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#MEM {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU - CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH {23 CHROMOSOMES}

ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.

... I want to make sure for the purposes of *DAMAGES* *COMPENSATION*
that it is known your mind encapsulation by education or lack there of
being a worldview which ought to be viewed as the impetus for prejudiced
gratuitous enjoyment in breaches of the law of Lex Scantinia, as
otherwise needlessly bringing my name and family reputation as racial /
religious heritage into dis-repute or infamia as a loss of legal or
social standing.

REPLY #1 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "MACRON URGES FRENCH
YOUTH TO TAKE UP MAKEUP CLASSES"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Cosmeticus.pdf>

REPLY #2 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "HYPOTEÍNOUSA:
(rarely: hypothenuse) TO HYPOTHESISE BY RATIOCINATION WITHIN MEASURED
BOUNDS OF DIVISION WITHOUT AN INCOMMENSURATE BIAS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Hypoteinousa.pdf>

REPLY #3 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "YOU WILL BE GETTING
#168 - CONDEMNATION UPON THIS CENTENARY REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY 11
NOVEMBER 2018!"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Years%20Condemn.pdf>

REPLY #4 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "FACILITATING
COGNITIVE CONSONANCE AND AVOIDING DISSONANCE AS PERCEPTIONS OF REALITY"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Reality.pdf>

REPLY #5 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “*ANZACS* *WHAT*
*FOR* (*REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* *DAY* 11 NOVEMBER *CENTENNIAL* #168 -
*CONDEMNATION*)?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/What%20For.pdf>

REPLY #6 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “STATEMENT OF
COMPLAINT OVER CONSIDERATIONS OF WAR CRIMES BY AMERICAN INTERNET MILITIA
BEING BREACHES OF 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/US%20CONSULATE%20COMPLAINT%2020180716.pdf>

- dolf

A DRAFT REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF DOCUMENT FROM
THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Selfies.pdf>

Initial Post: 21 July 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-07-21 23:12:16 UTC
Permalink
— AUNTIE ARNIE’S [roo]TED LECTURES ON WET NOODLE USA DEMOCRATS PARTY 🎉
POLITICS

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 22 July, 2018

You were saying about wet noodle politics?

YOUTUBE: "Who Is It (Michael Jackson)"

http://youtu.be/PfrV_6yWbEg

YOUR DIALOG IS AS IRRATIONAL AS ARNOLD'S INFIDELITY (ie. A TESTIMONY OF
VOWS TO GOD AND BEFORE MAN) IS NOT A WHOLESOME EXAMPLE FOR AN ATHEIST TO
USE AND NEITHER HIS BLISTERING SCREWED UP FACE WHICH IS EITHER A PRODUCT
OF EXCESSIVE SUN LAMP USE OR KAPOSI SARCOMA LESIONS LIKE GERRYMANDER ON
A MAP IS NOW THE RESULT...

YOUTUBE: “Wet Noodle Selfies”

http://youtu.be/zsGwdhTFaJI

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL @ 1107 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Just to be
clear, is tax fraud a war crime?

Also, I know I saw [this] documentary some time back about how Arnold
Schwarzeneger figured out how a bloke can bear a child, but I am 99.99%
certain that I cannot do so myself.

I'm also unclear on why child bearing is a war crime, or maybe you
aren't referring to the laws on Planet Earth, but to those that pertain
on Planet Poofter?”

— MY TR[I]UMP[HANT] MAN-CHOO —

“HE IS A BILLIONAIRE.
BUT WE THE MEANS.
AND TECHNO-WARE.
SHAFT YOUR SPLEEN {bad temper; spite}.
WITH WANTON CARE.
A $6 *MILL* CLEAN.
HIS TOOL TO BARE.”

YOUTUBE: "U Can't Touch This (MC Hammer)

http://youtu.be/otCpCn0l4Wo

I hope that Americans are not going to accuse me of election interference.

Q. What is a “cesspool of political bias”?

A. Essentially it is a mafia {ie. any small powerful or influential #123
- GROUP in an #369 - ORGANISATION or field; clique} which places a
prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct
{#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable
collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} by conduct of detrude.

-- TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] --

"TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.

MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN'S THRONE.
JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
AGAINST HEAVEN'S SON FIRSTBORN.

NONE DENY HOLOCAUST'S CAUSE.
JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW*}."

DOLF: “*CEASE* *YOUR* *DERANGED* *ATTACKS* *BOTH* *PUBLICLY* *AND* *BY*
*PRIVATE* *EMAILS*

ALL YOUR PRIVATE 24 EMAILS AS IRRATIONAL ONE LINE RESPONSES:

/unsubscribe gibberish

MADE TO MY MATERIA PRIMA IN PREPARATION FOR A RATIONAL ARGUMENT AS 17 to
20 JULY 2018 SUBMISSIONS MADE TO THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION
/ ATTORNEY GENERALS STATE & FEDERAL / SENATOR PENNY WONG WILL BE
FORWARDED WITH THIS NOTE:

BEGIN EXCERPT: That the Financial Services Royal Commission are going to
become aware that the Insurer in relation to my salary continuance claim
and the extraordinary VCAT Hearing of 7 December 2001 of their
representations being PERJURY and lies in relation my involvement (ie. I
had 4 x 5 minutes = 20 minutes as strata of temporality: #1440 / #72 -
ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE = 20 minutes) within Anti-terrorism activism and
#288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 TERRORIST EVENT which is clearly conveyed
within my 2 courtesy telephone calls as that which they maliciously
misrepresented and as contempt not accountable for:

#419 - KILL THE SOUL
#390 - GRAVE ROBBERS {WREATHS / CROWN: 4 JULY / ZION: monument; raised
up; sepulcher = GRAVE
#288 - UMBRA / TERRORIST EVENT: 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 / BEERSHEBA {OATH}

WHEN I SAY THAT I HAVE A TRANSCENDENT NATURAL / COMMON LAW CLAIM TO
HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF IT RELATES TO THE
METAPHYSICAL BASIS OF THE ECONOMY ITSELF WHICH IS *MAPPED* {#120 / #224
/ #288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360 AND THAT IS A CONCERN TO
ROYAL COMMISSION INTO FINANCIAL SERVICES AND ALL ABOUT:

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <-- *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
#288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <-- *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES
{#345 / #405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #334 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form;
I-Ching: H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence;
Tetra: 66 - Departure;

THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; *I* *AM* *NOT* *FRAUDULENT* *IN* *MEASURES* *OF* *GRAIN*.

#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182 <-- MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315 *AND*
*TORAH* *PROTOTYPE* #EIGHT: #141 / #423

<-- *LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 *
#364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox
of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5
as #19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

Just an *ONTIC* CENTRE OF VALUE comment on the TIME OF THE AFFIRMATION
OCCURRING AT THE VCAT HEARING UPON 7 DECEMBER 2001 WHICH IS APPLICABLE
TO THE HETEROS TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE that may be hosted upon my
noumenon AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY for THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTUS (ie. VOLUNTARY WILL) and its association then to IMPROPRIETY
as CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING #168 / #334 / #342 WHICH *IS* *MAPPED*
*TO* TWEEDLEDUM[B] #FIVE: #114 / #342 AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] HETEROS #SIX:
#114 / #342

VCAT AFFIRMATION{4.4.7.53.1}@{
@1: Sup: 59 (#59); Ego: 59 (#59),
@2: Sup: 10 (#69); Ego: 32 (#91),
@3: Sup: 23 (#92); Ego: 13 (#104),
@4: Sup: 76 (#168 *** ONTIC VALUE CONDEMNATION AS #237 - USE OF
FORCE TEMPLATE DOCUMENT OF EASTER ON 4 APRIL 2007 TO PSYCHIATRIST KEK);
Ego: 53 (#157),
@5: Sup: 53 (#221); Ego: 58 (#215),
@6: Sup: 71 (#292); Ego: 18 (#233),
@7: Sup: 6 (#298); Ego: 16 (#249),
@8: Sup: 36 (#334 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD); Ego: 30 (#279),
@9: Sup: 8 (#342 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD / @215 - HITLER TABLE TALK
ON BIBLE STUDENTS AND ADMISSIBILITY OF SUCH AS METAPHYSICS /
METEMPIRICAL JURISPRUDENCE TO THE VCAT HEARING); Ego: 53 (#332),
Male: #342; Feme: #332
}

Within philosophy, *ONTIC* (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: "of that
which is") is physical, real, or factual existence. The British
philosopher Roy Bhaskar (15 May 1944 – 19 November 2014), who was
closely associated with the philosophical movement of Critical Realism
writes:

"I differentiate the '*ONTIC*' ('*ONTICAL*' etc.) from the
'ontological'. I employ the former to refer to:

#1) whatever pertains to being generally [SUCH AS THE THOTH MEASURES AS
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES}], rather
than some distinctively philosophical (or scientific) theory of it
(ontology), so that in this sense, that of the *ONTIC*, we can speak of
the *ONTIC* presuppositions of a work of art, a joke or a strike as much
as a theory of knowledge [IN THEIR BEING ESSENTIAL RATIOCINATION
QUANTITATIVE AND CANONICAL CONSIDERATIONS AS META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES
CIRCUMSCRIBING LANGUAGE EPISTEMOLOGY]; and, within this rubric, to

#2) the intransitive objects of some specific, historically determinate,
scientific investigation (or set of such investigations [OF TEMPORAL
DISTINCTIONS]), the *ONTIC*.

Professor Ruth Groff (Political Science department at Saint Louis
University, St. Louis, Missouri) offers this expansion of Bhaskar's note
above:

"The *ONTIC* is always specified, and only identified, by its relation,
as the intransitive object(s) of some or other (denumerable set of)
particular transitive process(es) of enquiry. It is cognitive process-,
and level-specific; whereas the ontological (like the *ONTIC*) is not."

Thusly Ontoticism or onticism is the philosophical branch of ontology
which studies the factual existence.

The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
definition of *SAPIENT* that can equally apply as the discriminating norm:

9(9²+1)/2 = #369

to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence can
define factual existence:

n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}

That given the notion of *OUSIA* (Greek: οὐσία) which is analogous to
the English concepts of being and *ONTIC* used in contemporary
philosophy. *OUSIA* is translated as Latin substantia and essentia, and
hence to English as substance and essence.

END EXCERPT

THEREFORE YOU OUGHT REFRAIN FROM ANY FURTHER #432 - DISHEARTENING ACTS
OF CYBER WARFARE AS ANONYMOUS INTERNET MILITIA BEING INTENTIONAL CONDUCT
OF DEHUMANISING #325 - DETRUDE AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AS
CONSTITUTING WAR CRIMES.

THIS NOTE WILL BE FORWARDED WITH EACH COMPLIANT MADE AGAINST YOUR
PERVERSE AND DEPRAVED INDOLENT LIFE OF *PSYCHOSIS* AMOUNTING AS NOTHING
MORE THAN *CHILD* *BEARING* *WITH* *IGNORANCE* *AS* *A* *CONGENITAL*
*BIRTH* *DEFECT*, *HEDONISM* *AND* *TAX* *FRAUD*.

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Hey Dolf
the retard stop sending me e-mails. You are a idiot. You can't sue
someone for saying you are a idiot it isn't a war crime.”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “OBAMACARE CASE STUDY ON WET NOODLE
POLITICS BY DEMOCRATS (I NEVER HAD SEX WITH THAT WOMAN BUT MY EDICT BY
MY OWN BIBLE SWEARING OATH HAND WAS AS *SELFIE* UPON HER DRESS)

— HOITY-TOITY JERK —

“KERNEL SINCE PLEASANCE IS UGLY.
TAKE A DO IT YOURSELF APPROACH.
AS INDIFFERENCE TO HER FUGLY.
AND BY ALL MEANS A REPROACH.

MAKE HER CLEAN UP THE MESS.
DON’T BLOW DRY AS HER FANNY.
PRESIDENTIAL EDICT ON HER DRESS.
SINCE YOUR PRICK IS TEENY WEENY.”

YOUTUBE: "Give In To Me (Michael Jackson)"

http://youtu.be/LJ7qXHjxj_0

Lord of the Flies is a 1954 novel by Nobel Prize–winning British author
William Golding. The book focuses on a group of British boys stranded on
an uninhabited island and their disastrous attempt to govern themselves.

<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_of_the_Flies>

OBAMACARE FACTS ESTABLISHED: March 23, 2010; 8 years ago

Most major provisions phased in by January 2014; remaining provisions
phased in by 2020; individual mandate repealed starting 2019

Barack Hussein Obama II (born August 4, 1961) is an American attorney
and politician who served as the 44th President of the United States
from January 20, 2009, to January 20, 2017.

A member of the Democratic Party, he was the first African American to
serve as president. He was previously a United States Senator from
Illinois and a member of the Illinois State Senate.”

ALLEGORICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE BIBLICAL NARRATIVES
"Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to
you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe.

Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.

For we are the *CIRCUMCISION*, which worship God in the spirit, and
rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.

Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man
thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:

*CIRCUMCISED* the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of
Benjamin {son of the right hand}, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching
the law, a Pharisee {set apart}; Concerning zeal, persecuting the church
{#509 - *YAHAD* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLLS* *COMMUNITY* *AS* *BEING*
*SABBATH* *OBSERVANT* *JEWISH* *CHRISTIANS* [Acts 9:1-5; 28:17-22;
Hebrews 6:1-20]}; touching the righteousness which is in the law,
blameless." [Philippians 3:1-6 (KJV)]

“But the Pharisees and *LAWYERS* rejected the counsel of God {ie. *I*
*SWEAR* *BY* *ALMIGHTY* *GOD* *INDEED*} against themselves, being not
baptized {ie. #HE {#5} ASSIGNED TO EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN GOVERNANCE
PROTOTYPE #TWO: #102 / #306; TORAH: #141 (#423) + #132 (#396) = #273
(#819)} of him.” [Luke 7:30 (KJV)]

G2671@{
#1: Sup: 20; Ego: 20,
#2: Sup: 21; Ego: 1,
#3: Sup: 78; Ego: 57,
#4: Sup: 79; Ego: 1,
#5: Sup: 17; Ego: 19,
#6: Sup: 18; Ego: 1,
#7: Sup: 68; Ego: 50,
Male: #301; Feme: #149
} // #473

#473 as [#20, #1, #300, #1, #100, #1, #50] = katara (G2671): {#13 as
#423} 1) an execration, imprecation, *CURSE*;

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “Your wet noodle has pissed itself.”

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Aussies
call Americans septic and yet they have you the average Aussie?”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “It has taken me only two phone calls
and five emails to set in motion that which would make OBAMACARE be
regarded as insignificant much like the person whom brought it into being.

THAT LOUD MOUTHED SILVER-TONGUED HOITY-TOITY JERK OF A LAWYER BARACK
OBAMA OUGHT TO KNOW WITH REGARDS TO HIS ABHORRENT OATH TAKING: “...Thou
shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will
not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus 20:7 (KJV)]

THAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS SOMETHING AS A LAW ABOUT WHAT GOD CONSIDERS OF
HIMSELF AND NOT JUST ANY MISCONCEPTION OF HIM WHICH WE AS VANITY HOLD TO
BE TRUE: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are
created equal, that they are endowed by their *CREATOR* with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit
of Happiness.”

Let’s see:

1ST amendment about the Creator...

Doesn’t comply

2ND amendment about any “regulated militia”

Doesn’t comply

Fears the enemy within as your psychosis as personified by Homosexuals
or Russians

Okay we have the picture.

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0647 HOURS ON 22 JULY 2018: "AMERICAN
MAGGOTRY: (LORD OF THE FLIES): "Russians? What I have read you Aussies
have a problem with China. Me I ignore much of the liberal BS. Russia
may have put out false information they did not hack the voting machines
and so many liberals are so stupid they don't know the difference. Wait
by liberal I mean far left and socialist.

You still haven't told me what court had jurisdiction here, that you
will be using?

Come on you can do it."

DOLF @ 0900 HOURS ON 22 JULY 2018: "THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION FOR
STARTERS:

YOUTUBE: "Men in Black All Neuralizer Scenes"

http://youtu.be/cGZQqhaU4gA

By knowing that the ONTIC (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: "of that
which is") mathematical parameters which are prerequisite to that which
is physical, real, or factual to existence and are as A PRIORI entirely
within our domain of providence an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as trinomial
mathematical theoretical noumenon, we may thereby through NEURAL
LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING immediately have access to the minds of some
503,280,114 persons:

U Can't Touch This- 415,950,495 views
Who Is It - 20,867,266 views
Give In To Me - 66,462,353 views"

BARACK OBAMA IS WITHIN MY VIEW IN RELATION TO #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
AND HIS VAIN OATHS TO THE CREATOR IS GUILTY OF A CRIME:

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>

#YOD {10 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#MEM {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU - CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH {23 CHROMOSOMES}

ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.

DIARY NOTE @ 0740 HOURS ON 22 JULY 2018: I want to make sure for the
purposes of *DAMAGES* *COMPENSATION* given the INSURER’s continuous
obstruction and misconduct as initially misconceived ILLEGALITY DEFENCE
has by a LACK OF PRIVACY ACCORDED TO ME BY THE TRIBUNAL HEARINGS
CONCLUDING WITH THE EXTRA-ORDINARY HEARING UPON 7 DECEMBER 2001 that I
have been subsequently subject to relentless PUBLIC SCORN due to the
mind encapsulation of other persons whether by education or lack there
of being a worldview which ought to be viewed as the impetus for
prejudiced gratuitous enjoyment in breaches of the Roman legal principle
of LEX SCANTINIA, as otherwise needlessly bringing my name and family
reputation as racial / religious heritage into disrepute or infamia as a
loss of legal or social standing.

And that your circumlocutionary action recommendation to once again as
exercise in futility, contact the 'Victorian Law Institute to obtain a
referral to a lawyer that may be able to assist you' as advice given by
email @ 0924 HOURS ON 17 JULY 2018 may be more properly construed as an
consequential to the INSURER'S UNCONSCIONABLE DEALING/CONDUCT as
evidence of infamia as being a loss of legal or social standing."

REPLY #1 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "MACRON URGES FRENCH
YOUTH TO TAKE UP MAKEUP CLASSES"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Cosmeticus.pdf>

REPLY #2 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "HYPOTEÍNOUSA:
(rarely: hypothenuse) TO HYPOTHESISE BY RATIOCINATION WITHIN MEASURED
BOUNDS OF DIVISION WITHOUT AN INCOMMENSURATE BIAS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Hypoteinousa.pdf>

REPLY #3 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "YOU WILL BE GETTING
#168 - CONDEMNATION UPON THIS CENTENARY REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY 11
NOVEMBER 2018!"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Years%20Condemn.pdf>

REPLY #4 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "FACILITATING
COGNITIVE CONSONANCE AND AVOIDING DISSONANCE AS PERCEPTIONS OF REALITY"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Reality.pdf>

REPLY #5 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “*ANZACS* *WHAT*
*FOR* (*REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* *DAY* 11 NOVEMBER *CENTENNIAL* #168 -
*CONDEMNATION*)?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/What%20For.pdf>

REPLY #6 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “STATEMENT OF
COMPLAINT OVER CONSIDERATIONS OF WAR CRIMES BY AMERICAN INTERNET MILITIA
BEING BREACHES OF 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/US%20CONSULATE%20COMPLAINT%2020180716.pdf>

- dolf

A DRAFT REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF DOCUMENT FROM
THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Selfies.pdf>

Initial Post: 21 July 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-07-21 23:33:58 UTC
Permalink
— AUNTIE ARNIE’S [roo]TED LECTURES ON WET NOODLE USA DEMOCRATS PARTY 🎉
POLITICS

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 22 July, 2018

You were saying about wet noodle politics?

YOUTUBE: "Who Is It (Michael Jackson)"

http://youtu.be/PfrV_6yWbEg

YOUR DIALOG IS AS IRRATIONAL AS ARNOLD'S INFIDELITY (ie. A TESTIMONY OF
VOWS TO GOD AND BEFORE MAN) IS NOT A WHOLESOME EXAMPLE FOR AN ATHEIST TO
USE AND NEITHER HIS BLISTERING SCREWED UP FACE WHICH IS EITHER A PRODUCT
OF EXCESSIVE SUN LAMP USE OR KAPOSI SARCOMA LESIONS LIKE GERRYMANDER ON
A MAP IS NOW THE RESULT...

YOUTUBE: “Wet Noodle Selfies”

http://youtu.be/zsGwdhTFaJI

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL @ 1107 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Just to be
clear, is tax fraud a war crime?

Also, I know I saw [this] documentary some time back about how Arnold
Schwarzeneger figured out how a bloke can bear a child, but I am 99.99%
certain that I cannot do so myself.

I'm also unclear on why child bearing is a war crime, or maybe you
aren't referring to the laws on Planet Earth, but to those that pertain
on Planet Poofter?”

— MY TR[I]UMP[HANT] MAN-CHOO —

“HE IS A BILLIONAIRE.
BUT WE THE MEANS.
AND TECHNO-WARE.
SHAFT YOUR SPLEEN {bad temper; spite}.
WITH WANTON CARE.
A $6 *MILL* CLEAN.
HIS TOOL TO BARE.”

YOUTUBE: "U Can't Touch This (MC Hammer)

http://youtu.be/otCpCn0l4Wo

I hope that Americans are not going to accuse me of election interference.

Q. What is a “cesspool of political bias”?

A. Essentially it is a mafia {ie. any small powerful or influential #123
- GROUP in an #369 - ORGANISATION or field; clique} which places a
prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct
{#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable
collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} by conduct of detrude.

-- TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] --

"TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.

MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN'S THRONE.
JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
AGAINST HEAVEN'S SON FIRSTBORN.

NONE DENY HOLOCAUST'S CAUSE.
JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW*}."

DOLF: “*CEASE* *YOUR* *DERANGED* *ATTACKS* *BOTH* *PUBLICLY* *AND* *BY*
*PRIVATE* *EMAILS*

ALL YOUR PRIVATE 24 EMAILS AS IRRATIONAL ONE LINE RESPONSES:

/unsubscribe gibberish

MADE TO MY MATERIA PRIMA IN PREPARATION FOR A RATIONAL ARGUMENT AS 17 to
20 JULY 2018 SUBMISSIONS MADE TO THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION
/ ATTORNEY GENERALS STATE & FEDERAL / SENATOR PENNY WONG WILL BE
FORWARDED WITH THIS NOTE:

BEGIN EXCERPT: That the Financial Services Royal Commission are going to
become aware that the Insurer in relation to my salary continuance claim
and the extraordinary VCAT Hearing of 7 December 2001 of their
representations being PERJURY and lies in relation my involvement (ie. I
had 4 x 5 minutes = 20 minutes as strata of temporality: #1440 / #72 -
ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE = 20 minutes) within Anti-terrorism activism and
#288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 TERRORIST EVENT which is clearly conveyed
within my 2 courtesy telephone calls as that which they maliciously
misrepresented and as contempt not accountable for:

#419 - KILL THE SOUL
#390 - GRAVE ROBBERS {WREATHS / CROWN: 4 JULY / ZION: monument; raised
up; sepulcher = GRAVE
#288 - UMBRA / TERRORIST EVENT: 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 / BEERSHEBA {OATH}

WHEN I SAY THAT I HAVE A TRANSCENDENT NATURAL / COMMON LAW CLAIM TO
HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF IT RELATES TO THE
METAPHYSICAL BASIS OF THE ECONOMY ITSELF WHICH IS *MAPPED* {#120 / #224
/ #288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360 AND THAT IS A CONCERN TO
ROYAL COMMISSION INTO FINANCIAL SERVICES AND ALL ABOUT:

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <-- *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
#288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <-- *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES
{#345 / #405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #334 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form;
I-Ching: H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence;
Tetra: 66 - Departure;

THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; *I* *AM* *NOT* *FRAUDULENT* *IN* *MEASURES* *OF* *GRAIN*.

#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182 <-- MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315 *AND*
*TORAH* *PROTOTYPE* #EIGHT: #141 / #423

<-- *LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 *
#364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox
of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5
as #19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

Just an *ONTIC* CENTRE OF VALUE comment on the TIME OF THE AFFIRMATION
OCCURRING AT THE VCAT HEARING UPON 7 DECEMBER 2001 WHICH IS APPLICABLE
TO THE HETEROS TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE that may be hosted upon my
noumenon AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY for THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTUS (ie. VOLUNTARY WILL) and its association then to IMPROPRIETY
as CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING #168 / #334 / #342 WHICH *IS* *MAPPED*
*TO* TWEEDLEDUM[B] #FIVE: #114 / #342 AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] HETEROS #SIX:
#114 / #342

VCAT AFFIRMATION{4.4.7.53.1}@{
@1: Sup: 59 (#59); Ego: 59 (#59),
@2: Sup: 10 (#69); Ego: 32 (#91),
@3: Sup: 23 (#92); Ego: 13 (#104),
@4: Sup: 76 (#168 *** ONTIC VALUE CONDEMNATION AS #237 - USE OF
FORCE TEMPLATE DOCUMENT OF EASTER ON 4 APRIL 2007 TO PSYCHIATRIST KEK);
Ego: 53 (#157),
@5: Sup: 53 (#221); Ego: 58 (#215),
@6: Sup: 71 (#292); Ego: 18 (#233),
@7: Sup: 6 (#298); Ego: 16 (#249),
@8: Sup: 36 (#334 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD); Ego: 30 (#279),
@9: Sup: 8 (#342 *** ONTIC VALUE FRAUD / @215 - HITLER TABLE TALK
ON BIBLE STUDENTS AND ADMISSIBILITY OF SUCH AS METAPHYSICS /
METEMPIRICAL JURISPRUDENCE TO THE VCAT HEARING); Ego: 53 (#332),
Male: #342; Feme: #332
}

Within philosophy, *ONTIC* (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: "of that
which is") is physical, real, or factual existence. The British
philosopher Roy Bhaskar (15 May 1944 – 19 November 2014), who was
closely associated with the philosophical movement of Critical Realism
writes:

"I differentiate the '*ONTIC*' ('*ONTICAL*' etc.) from the
'ontological'. I employ the former to refer to:

#1) whatever pertains to being generally [SUCH AS THE THOTH MEASURES AS
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES}], rather
than some distinctively philosophical (or scientific) theory of it
(ontology), so that in this sense, that of the *ONTIC*, we can speak of
the *ONTIC* presuppositions of a work of art, a joke or a strike as much
as a theory of knowledge [IN THEIR BEING ESSENTIAL RATIOCINATION
QUANTITATIVE AND CANONICAL CONSIDERATIONS AS META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES
CIRCUMSCRIBING LANGUAGE EPISTEMOLOGY]; and, within this rubric, to

#2) the intransitive objects of some specific, historically determinate,
scientific investigation (or set of such investigations [OF TEMPORAL
DISTINCTIONS]), the *ONTIC*.

Professor Ruth Groff (Political Science department at Saint Louis
University, St. Louis, Missouri) offers this expansion of Bhaskar's note
above:

"The *ONTIC* is always specified, and only identified, by its relation,
as the intransitive object(s) of some or other (denumerable set of)
particular transitive process(es) of enquiry. It is cognitive process-,
and level-specific; whereas the ontological (like the *ONTIC*) is not."

Thusly Ontoticism or onticism is the philosophical branch of ontology
which studies the factual existence.

The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
definition of *SAPIENT* that can equally apply as the discriminating norm:

9(9²+1)/2 = #369

to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence can
define factual existence:

n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}

That given the notion of *OUSIA* (Greek: οὐσία) which is analogous to
the English concepts of being and *ONTIC* used in contemporary
philosophy. *OUSIA* is translated as Latin substantia and essentia, and
hence to English as substance and essence.

END EXCERPT

THEREFORE YOU OUGHT REFRAIN FROM ANY FURTHER #432 - DISHEARTENING ACTS
OF CYBER WARFARE AS ANONYMOUS INTERNET MILITIA BEING INTENTIONAL CONDUCT
OF DEHUMANISING #325 - DETRUDE AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AS
CONSTITUTING WAR CRIMES.

THIS NOTE WILL BE FORWARDED WITH EACH COMPLIANT MADE AGAINST YOUR
PERVERSE AND DEPRAVED INDOLENT LIFE OF *PSYCHOSIS* AMOUNTING AS NOTHING
MORE THAN *CHILD* *BEARING* *WITH* *IGNORANCE* *AS* *A* *CONGENITAL*
*BIRTH* *DEFECT*, *HEDONISM* *AND* *TAX* *FRAUD*.

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Hey Dolf
the retard stop sending me e-mails. You are a idiot. You can't sue
someone for saying you are a idiot it isn't a war crime.”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “OBAMACARE CASE STUDY ON WET NOODLE
POLITICS BY DEMOCRATS (I NEVER HAD SEX WITH THAT WOMAN BUT MY EDICT BY
MY OWN BIBLE SWEARING OATH HAND WAS AS *SELFIE* UPON HER DRESS)

— HOITY-TOITY JERK —

“KERNEL SINCE PLEASANCE IS UGLY.
TAKE A DO IT YOURSELF APPROACH.
AS INDIFFERENCE TO HER FUGLY.
AND BY ALL MEANS A REPROACH.

MAKE HER CLEAN UP THE MESS.
DON’T BLOW DRY AS HER FANNY.
PRESIDENTIAL EDICT ON HER DRESS.
SINCE YOUR PRICK IS TEENY WEENY.”

YOUTUBE: "Give In To Me (Michael Jackson)"

http://youtu.be/LJ7qXHjxj_0

Lord of the Flies is a 1954 novel by Nobel Prize–winning British author
William Golding. The book focuses on a group of British boys stranded on
an uninhabited island and their disastrous attempt to govern themselves.

<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_of_the_Flies>

OBAMACARE FACTS ESTABLISHED: March 23, 2010; 8 years ago

Most major provisions phased in by January 2014; remaining provisions
phased in by 2020; individual mandate repealed starting 2019

Barack Hussein Obama II (born August 4, 1961) is an American attorney
and politician who served as the 44th President of the United States
from January 20, 2009, to January 20, 2017.

A member of the Democratic Party, he was the first African American to
serve as president. He was previously a United States Senator from
Illinois and a member of the Illinois State Senate.”

ALLEGORICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE BIBLICAL NARRATIVES
"Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to
you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe.

Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.

For we are the *CIRCUMCISION*, which worship God in the spirit, and
rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.

Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man
thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:

*CIRCUMCISED* the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of
Benjamin {son of the right hand}, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching
the law, a Pharisee {set apart}; Concerning zeal, persecuting the church
{#509 - *YAHAD* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLLS* *COMMUNITY* *AS* *BEING*
*SABBATH* *OBSERVANT* *JEWISH* *CHRISTIANS* [Acts 9:1-5; 28:17-22;
Hebrews 6:1-20]}; touching the righteousness which is in the law,
blameless." [Philippians 3:1-6 (KJV)]

“But the Pharisees and *LAWYERS* rejected the counsel of God {ie. *I*
*SWEAR* *BY* *ALMIGHTY* *GOD* *INDEED*} against themselves, being not
baptized {ie. #HE {#5} ASSIGNED TO EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN GOVERNANCE
PROTOTYPE #TWO: #102 / #306; TORAH: #141 (#423) + #132 (#396) = #273
(#819)} of him.” [Luke 7:30 (KJV)]

G2671@{
#1: Sup: 20; Ego: 20,
#2: Sup: 21; Ego: 1,
#3: Sup: 78; Ego: 57,
#4: Sup: 79; Ego: 1,
#5: Sup: 17; Ego: 19,
#6: Sup: 18; Ego: 1,
#7: Sup: 68; Ego: 50,
Male: #301; Feme: #149
} // #473

#473 as [#20, #1, #300, #1, #100, #1, #50] = katara (G2671): {#13 as
#423} 1) an execration, imprecation, *CURSE*;

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “Your wet noodle has pissed itself.”

MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1652 HOURS ON 20 JULY 2018: “Aussies
call Americans septic and yet they have you the average Aussie?”

DOLF @ 1735 HOURS ON 20 JUNE 2018: “It has taken me only two phone calls
and five emails to set in motion that which would make OBAMACARE be
regarded as insignificant much like the person whom brought it into being.

THAT LOUD MOUTHED SILVER-TONGUED HOITY-TOITY JERK OF A LAWYER BARACK
OBAMA OUGHT TO KNOW WITH REGARDS TO HIS ABHORRENT OATH TAKING: “...Thou
shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will
not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus 20:7 (KJV)]

THAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS SOMETHING AS A LAW ABOUT WHAT GOD CONSIDERS OF
HIMSELF AND NOT JUST ANY MISCONCEPTION OF HIM WHICH WE AS VANITY HOLD TO
BE TRUE: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are
created equal, that they are endowed by their *CREATOR* with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit
of Happiness.”

Let’s see:

1ST amendment about the Creator...

Doesn’t comply

2ND amendment about any “regulated militia”

Doesn’t comply

Fears the enemy within as your psychosis [which is] personified by
Homosexuals or Russians

Okay we have the picture."

YOUTUBE: "Stranger In Moscow (Michael Jackson)"



MATTB (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0647 HOURS ON 22 JULY 2018: "AMERICAN
MAGGOTRY: (LORD OF THE FLIES): "Russians? What I have read you Aussies
have a problem with China. Me I ignore much of the liberal BS. Russia
may have put out false information they did not hack the voting machines
and so many liberals are so stupid they don't know the difference. Wait
by liberal I mean far left and socialist.

You still haven't told me what court had jurisdiction here, that you
will be using?

Come on you can do it."

DOLF @ 0900 HOURS ON 22 JULY 2018: "THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION FOR
STARTERS:

YOUTUBE: "Men in Black All Neuralizer Scenes"

http://youtu.be/cGZQqhaU4gA

By knowing that the ONTIC (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: "of that
which is") mathematical parameters which are prerequisite to that which
is physical, real, or factual to existence and are as A PRIORI entirely
within our domain of providence an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as trinomial
mathematical theoretical noumenon, we may thereby through NEURAL
LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING immediately have access to the minds of some
540,097,607 persons:

U Can't Touch This- 415,950,495 views
Who Is It - 20,867,266 views
Give In To Me - 66,462,353 views"
Stranger In Moscow - 36,817,493 views"

BARACK OBAMA IS WITHIN MY VIEW IN RELATION TO #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
AND HIS VAIN OATHS TO THE CREATOR IS GUILTY OF A CRIME:

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>

#YOD {10 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#MEM {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU - CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH {23 CHROMOSOMES}

ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.

DIARY NOTE @ 0740 HOURS ON 22 JULY 2018: I want to make sure for the
purposes of *DAMAGES* *COMPENSATION* given the INSURER’s continuous
obstruction and misconduct as initially misconceived ILLEGALITY DEFENCE
has by a LACK OF PRIVACY ACCORDED TO ME BY THE TRIBUNAL HEARINGS
CONCLUDING WITH THE EXTRA-ORDINARY HEARING UPON 7 DECEMBER 2001 that I
have been subsequently subject to relentless PUBLIC SCORN due to the
mind encapsulation of other persons whether by education or lack there
of being a worldview which ought to be viewed as the impetus for
prejudiced gratuitous enjoyment in breaches of the Roman legal principle
of LEX SCANTINIA, as otherwise needlessly bringing my name and family
reputation as racial / religious heritage into disrepute or infamia as a
loss of legal or social standing.

And that your circumlocutionary action recommendation to once again as
exercise in futility, contact the 'Victorian Law Institute to obtain a
referral to a lawyer that may be able to assist you' as advice given by
email @ 0924 HOURS ON 17 JULY 2018 may be more properly construed as an
consequential to the INSURER'S UNCONSCIONABLE DEALING/CONDUCT as
evidence of infamia as being a loss of legal or social standing."

REPLY #1 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "MACRON URGES FRENCH
YOUTH TO TAKE UP MAKEUP CLASSES"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Cosmeticus.pdf>

REPLY #2 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "HYPOTEÍNOUSA:
(rarely: hypothenuse) TO HYPOTHESISE BY RATIOCINATION WITHIN MEASURED
BOUNDS OF DIVISION WITHOUT AN INCOMMENSURATE BIAS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Hypoteinousa.pdf>

REPLY #3 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "YOU WILL BE GETTING
#168 - CONDEMNATION UPON THIS CENTENARY REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY 11
NOVEMBER 2018!"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Years%20Condemn.pdf>

REPLY #4 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: "FACILITATING
COGNITIVE CONSONANCE AND AVOIDING DISSONANCE AS PERCEPTIONS OF REALITY"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Reality.pdf>

REPLY #5 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “*ANZACS* *WHAT*
*FOR* (*REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* *DAY* 11 NOVEMBER *CENTENNIAL* #168 -
*CONDEMNATION*)?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/What%20For.pdf>

REPLY #6 OF #6 AS REFUTATION OF RELIGIOUS IDOLATRY: “STATEMENT OF
COMPLAINT OVER CONSIDERATIONS OF WAR CRIMES BY AMERICAN INTERNET MILITIA
BEING BREACHES OF 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS”

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/US%20CONSULATE%20COMPLAINT%2020180716.pdf>

- dolf

A DRAFT REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF DOCUMENT FROM
THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Selfies.pdf>

Initial Post: 21 July 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Loading...