Discussion:
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest
(too old to reply)
Mattb
2020-05-07 17:02:52 UTC
Permalink
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest

CANBERRA, Australia — Australian Cardinal George Pell knew that a
notorious pedophile priest had been sexually abusing children years
before his arrest and had been aware of the Catholic Church's clergy
abuse problem since the early 1970s, a government inquiry concluded.

A report from the inquiry on child sexual abuse had been released in
2017, but findings concerning Pell — who was formerly Pope Francis'
finance minister and at one time the third-highest ranking cleric in
the Vatican — had been redacted until Thursday to avoid prejudicing
juries in any future prosecutions.

The government decided to release the full report after the High Court
last month overturned convictions against Pell on charges he molested
two choirboys in a Melbourne cathedral in the late 1990s when he was
an archbishop. The 78-year-old cleric spent 13 months in prison before
being released last month.

The findings undermine Pell's criticisms of what he described as the
church's inadequate response to the global abuse crisis and concealing
its extent.

Pell, who now lives in a Sydney seminary, said in a statement that he
was "surprised by some of the views" of the inquiry about his actions.

"These views are not supported by evidence," Pell said.

The inquiry rejected Pell's evidence given by video link from Rome in
2016 that he was deceived and lied to by church officials about
Australia's worst pedophile priest, Gerald Ridsdale, and disturbed
Melbourne parish priest Peter Searson.

Ridsdale is in prison on convictions for sexually abusing boys over
three decades.

https://www.startribune.com/inquiry-pell-knew-of-abuse-by-australian-pedophile-priest/570260512/
Dechucka
2020-05-07 18:11:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest
CANBERRA, Australia — Australian Cardinal George Pell knew that a
notorious pedophile priest had been sexually abusing children years
before his arrest and had been aware of the Catholic Church's clergy
abuse problem since the early 1970s, a government inquiry concluded.
Sadly just confirms what was basically known about Pell's role in the
cover-up of abuse and the movement of abusers to keep abusing by the RCC
Patrick B
2020-05-07 20:01:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest
CANBERRA, Australia — Australian Cardinal George Pell knew that a
notorious pedophile priest had been sexually abusing children years
before his arrest and had been aware of the Catholic Church's clergy
abuse problem since the early 1970s, a government inquiry concluded.
Sadly just confirms what was basically known about Pell's role in the
cover-up of abuse and the movement of abusers to keep abusing by the RCC
WAHHHHHHHHHH
Dechucka
2020-05-07 20:12:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest
CANBERRA, Australia — Australian Cardinal George Pell knew that a
notorious pedophile priest had been sexually abusing children years
before his arrest and had been aware of the Catholic Church's clergy
abuse problem since the early 1970s, a government inquiry concluded.
Sadly just confirms what was basically known about Pell's role in the
cover-up of abuse and the movement of abusers to keep abusing by the RCC
WAHHHHHHHHHH
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
Mattb
2020-05-07 23:42:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest
CANBERRA, Australia — Australian Cardinal George Pell knew that a
notorious pedophile priest had been sexually abusing children years
before his arrest and had been aware of the Catholic Church's clergy
abuse problem since the early 1970s, a government inquiry concluded.
Sadly just confirms what was basically known about Pell's role in the
cover-up of abuse and the movement of abusers to keep abusing by the RCC
WAHHHHHHHHHH
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Petzl
2020-05-08 03:30:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest
CANBERRA, Australia — Australian Cardinal George Pell knew that a
notorious pedophile priest had been sexually abusing children years
before his arrest and had been aware of the Catholic Church's clergy
abuse problem since the early 1970s, a government inquiry concluded.
Sadly just confirms what was basically known about Pell's role in the
cover-up of abuse and the movement of abusers to keep abusing by the RCC
WAHHHHHHHHHH
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
--
Petzl
Well, it’s [the media] run by Godless Communists
who fear the religious more than anything,
as we don’t put the entirety of our faith in
hapless politicians & the state
Mattb
2020-05-08 04:12:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest
CANBERRA, Australia — Australian Cardinal George Pell knew that a
notorious pedophile priest had been sexually abusing children years
before his arrest and had been aware of the Catholic Church's clergy
abuse problem since the early 1970s, a government inquiry concluded.
Sadly just confirms what was basically known about Pell's role in the
cover-up of abuse and the movement of abusers to keep abusing by the RCC
WAHHHHHHHHHH
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
Petzl
2020-05-08 07:23:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem

Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.

Bolsheviks committed the greatest human slaughter in modern
history,and the fact that the world is largely ignorant and uncaring
about this fact is proof that the global media are in the hands of the
perpetrators
--
Petzl
Well, it’s [the media] run by Godless Communists
who fear the religious more than anything,
as we don’t put the entirety of our faith in
hapless politicians & the state
Dechucka
2020-05-08 08:11:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
and the Jews deserved to die in the Holocaust according to you. BTW the
Spanish Inquisition wasn't to keen on the Jews or protestants either. Of
course as I'm sure you don't know the Spanish Inquisition was not the
only one.

What your rant has to do with the covering-up of sex abuse, the enabling
of sex abusers and the other evil in the RCC I'm not sure
Patrick B
2020-05-08 13:57:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
and the Jews deserved to die in the Holocaust according to you. BTW the
Spanish Inquisition wasn't to keen on the Jews or protestants either. Of
course as I'm sure you don't know the Spanish Inquisition was not the
only one.
What your rant has to do with the covering-up of sex abuse, the enabling
of sex abusers and the other evil in the RCC I'm not sure
Go after the larger number of sex abusers. Step fathers, coaches,
teachers, and civil servants. You'll get a lot more abusers and
identify many times the victims.
Mattb
2020-05-08 16:28:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
and the Jews deserved to die in the Holocaust according to you. BTW the
Spanish Inquisition wasn't to keen on the Jews or protestants either. Of
course as I'm sure you don't know the Spanish Inquisition was not the
only one.
What your rant has to do with the covering-up of sex abuse, the enabling
of sex abusers and the other evil in the RCC I'm not sure
Go after the larger number of sex abusers. Step fathers, coaches,
teachers, and civil servants. You'll get a lot more abusers and
identify many times the victims.
To Patrick Barker RCC priest have the right to rape kids in Jesus
name. Then go out and pretend to forgive sins, marry people and give
last rites, all before washing their hands.
Dechucka
2020-05-08 20:45:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
and the Jews deserved to die in the Holocaust according to you. BTW the
Spanish Inquisition wasn't to keen on the Jews or protestants either. Of
course as I'm sure you don't know the Spanish Inquisition was not the
only one.
What your rant has to do with the covering-up of sex abuse, the enabling
of sex abusers and the other evil in the RCC I'm not sure
Go after the larger number of sex abusers. Step fathers, coaches,
teachers, and civil servants. You'll get a lot more abusers and
identify many times the victims.
To Patrick Barker RCC priest have the right to rape kids in Jesus
name.
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
Post by Mattb
Then go out and pretend to forgive sins, marry people and give'
last rites, all before washing their hands.
The worse hypocrisy is those that covered it up and enabled it all to
protect the RCC name/product
Patrick B
2020-05-08 22:41:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
and the Jews deserved to die in the Holocaust according to you. BTW the
Spanish Inquisition wasn't to keen on the Jews or protestants either. Of
course as I'm sure you don't know the Spanish Inquisition was not the
only one.
What your rant has to do with the covering-up of sex abuse, the enabling
of sex abusers and the other evil in the RCC I'm not sure
Go after the larger number of sex abusers. Step fathers, coaches,
teachers, and civil servants. You'll get a lot more abusers and
identify many times the victims.
To Patrick Barker RCC priest have the right to rape kids in Jesus
name.
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
matty is a disgruntled troll who hates Patrick. Take that into
consideration on anything he whines about.
Dechucka
2020-05-08 22:43:32 UTC
Permalink
snip
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
matty is a disgruntled troll who hates Patrick. Take that into
consideration on anything he whines about.
The question remains Are you 'Patdick' misrepresenting ' "Suffer little
children, and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '?
Fran
2020-05-09 04:29:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Dechucka
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
matty is a disgruntled troll who hates Patrick.  Take that into
consideration on anything he whines about.
He's not the only person to have a genuine and reasonable gripe bout
Patrick. Patrick is an apologist for paedophile priests
Post by Dechucka
The question remains Are you 'Patdick' misrepresenting ' "Suffer little
children, and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '?
Yep.
Patrick B
2020-05-09 13:25:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fran
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Dechucka
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
matty is a disgruntled troll who hates Patrick.  Take that into
consideration on anything he whines about.
He's not the only person to have a genuine and reasonable gripe bout
Patrick. Patrick is an apologist for paedophile priests
Post by Dechucka
The question remains Are you 'Patdick' misrepresenting ' "Suffer little
children, and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '?
Yep.
Heyy! Are you misrepresenting me again?
d***@cox.net
2020-05-09 13:42:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Fran
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Dechucka
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
matty is a disgruntled troll who hates Patrick.  Take that into
consideration on anything he whines about.
He's not the only person to have a genuine and reasonable gripe bout
Patrick. Patrick is an apologist for paedophile priests
Hey, fran, did you double park your broom? You're lying again.
Post by Patrick B
Post by Fran
Post by Dechucka
The question remains Are you 'Patdick' misrepresenting ' "Suffer little
children, and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '?
Yep.
Heyy! Are you misrepresenting me again?
the dukester, American-American
Mattb
2020-05-09 17:30:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Patrick B
Post by Fran
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Dechucka
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
matty is a disgruntled troll who hates Patrick.  Take that into
consideration on anything he whines about.
He's not the only person to have a genuine and reasonable gripe bout
Patrick. Patrick is an apologist for paedophile priests
Hey, fran, did you double park your broom? You're lying again.
Fran I thought I was the only one they talked to like this.....You
must be doing something right.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Patrick B
Post by Fran
Post by Dechucka
The question remains Are you 'Patdick' misrepresenting ' "Suffer little
children, and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '?
Yep.
Heyy! Are you misrepresenting me again?
the dukester, American-American
Patrick B
2020-05-09 20:03:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Fran
snip
Post by Dechucka
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
matty is a disgruntled troll who hates Patrick.  Take that into
consideration on anything he whines about.
He's not the only person to have a genuine and reasonable gripe bout
Patrick. Patrick is an apologist for paedophile priests
Hey, fran, did you double park your broom? You're lying again.
Fran I thought I was the only one they talked to like this.....You
must be doing something right.
Are ya jealous?
You are not the ONLY TROLL on the newsgroup.
d***@cox.net
2020-05-10 21:55:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Fran
snip
Post by Dechucka
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
matty is a disgruntled troll who hates Patrick.  Take that into
consideration on anything he whines about.
He's not the only person to have a genuine and reasonable gripe bout
Patrick. Patrick is an apologist for paedophile priests
Hey, fran, did you double park your broom? You're lying again.
Fran I thought I was the only one they talked to like this.....You
must be doing something right.
She deserves that comment. I've never seen her offer a valid point on
scripture.
the dukester, American-American
Patrick B
2020-05-09 13:25:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
matty is a disgruntled troll who hates Patrick. Take that into
consideration on anything he whines about.
The question remains Are you 'Patdick' misrepresenting ' "Suffer little
children, and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '?
Patrick doesn't misrepresent anything.
He calls em like he sees em.
Every single time.
Mattb
2020-05-09 03:11:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
and the Jews deserved to die in the Holocaust according to you. BTW the
Spanish Inquisition wasn't to keen on the Jews or protestants either. Of
course as I'm sure you don't know the Spanish Inquisition was not the
only one.
What your rant has to do with the covering-up of sex abuse, the enabling
of sex abusers and the other evil in the RCC I'm not sure
Go after the larger number of sex abusers. Step fathers, coaches,
teachers, and civil servants. You'll get a lot more abusers and
identify many times the victims.
To Patrick Barker RCC priest have the right to rape kids in Jesus
name.
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
I'd say Patrick, Duke and Rod all three do that.
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Then go out and pretend to forgive sins, marry people and give'
last rites, all before washing their hands.
The worse hypocrisy is those that covered it up and enabled it all to
protect the RCC name/product
Sad thing is some like Patrick think they should cover it,up and
enable.
d***@cox.net
2020-05-09 13:38:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
and the Jews deserved to die in the Holocaust according to you. BTW the
Spanish Inquisition wasn't to keen on the Jews or protestants either. Of
course as I'm sure you don't know the Spanish Inquisition was not the
only one.
What your rant has to do with the covering-up of sex abuse, the enabling
of sex abusers and the other evil in the RCC I'm not sure
Go after the larger number of sex abusers. Step fathers, coaches,
teachers, and civil servants. You'll get a lot more abusers and
identify many times the victims.
To Patrick Barker RCC priest have the right to rape kids in Jesus
name.
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
Nope, just more of the "redskin with a black heart" makeup lying. And to think
his old man was the chief of the tribe.
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Then go out and pretend to forgive sins, marry people and give'
last rites, all before washing their hands.
The worse hypocrisy is those that covered it up and enabled it all to
protect the RCC name/product
Can you prove "enabled". No, you can't, your being a major ng liar on that
issue.

the dukester, American-American
Mattb
2020-05-09 17:24:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
and the Jews deserved to die in the Holocaust according to you. BTW the
Spanish Inquisition wasn't to keen on the Jews or protestants either. Of
course as I'm sure you don't know the Spanish Inquisition was not the
only one.
What your rant has to do with the covering-up of sex abuse, the enabling
of sex abusers and the other evil in the RCC I'm not sure
Go after the larger number of sex abusers. Step fathers, coaches,
teachers, and civil servants. You'll get a lot more abusers and
identify many times the victims.
To Patrick Barker RCC priest have the right to rape kids in Jesus
name.
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
Nope, just more of the "redskin with a black heart" makeup lying. And to think
his old man was the chief of the tribe.
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Then go out and pretend to forgive sins, marry people and give'
last rites, all before washing their hands.
The worse hypocrisy is those that covered it up and enabled it all to
protect the RCC name/product
Can you prove "enabled". No, you can't, your being a major ng liar on that
issue.
Duke/Earl Weber, Patrick Barker and Rodney Eastman defend the
pedophilia and the cover-up. They lie, make threats and such to do
it.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
d***@cox.net
2020-05-10 21:56:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
and the Jews deserved to die in the Holocaust according to you. BTW the
Spanish Inquisition wasn't to keen on the Jews or protestants either. Of
course as I'm sure you don't know the Spanish Inquisition was not the
only one.
What your rant has to do with the covering-up of sex abuse, the enabling
of sex abusers and the other evil in the RCC I'm not sure
Go after the larger number of sex abusers. Step fathers, coaches,
teachers, and civil servants. You'll get a lot more abusers and
identify many times the victims.
To Patrick Barker RCC priest have the right to rape kids in Jesus
name.
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
Nope, just more of the "redskin with a black heart" makeup lying. And to think
his old man was the chief of the tribe.
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Then go out and pretend to forgive sins, marry people and give'
last rites, all before washing their hands.
The worse hypocrisy is those that covered it up and enabled it all to
protect the RCC name/product
Can you prove "enabled". No, you can't, your being a major ng liar on that
issue.
Duke/Earl Weber, Patrick Barker and Rodney Eastman defend the
pedophilia and the cover-up. They lie, make threats and such to do
it.
We do not defend your love for those discusting traits for abusing children the
way you do.
the dukester, American-American

Dechucka
2020-05-09 20:35:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
and the Jews deserved to die in the Holocaust according to you. BTW the
Spanish Inquisition wasn't to keen on the Jews or protestants either. Of
course as I'm sure you don't know the Spanish Inquisition was not the
only one.
What your rant has to do with the covering-up of sex abuse, the enabling
of sex abusers and the other evil in the RCC I'm not sure
Go after the larger number of sex abusers. Step fathers, coaches,
teachers, and civil servants. You'll get a lot more abusers and
identify many times the victims.
To Patrick Barker RCC priest have the right to rape kids in Jesus
name.
Are you suggesting Patdick is misrepresenting ' "Suffer little children,
and forbid them not, to come unto me:" or me unto them '
Nope, just more of the "redskin with a black heart" makeup lying. And to think
his old man was the chief of the tribe.
?
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Then go out and pretend to forgive sins, marry people and give'
last rites, all before washing their hands.
The worse hypocrisy is those that covered it up and enabled it all to
protect the RCC name/product
Can you prove "enabled". No, you can't, your being a major ng liar on that
issue.
Certainly can, Bernard McGrath admitted it
Dechucka
2020-05-08 20:26:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
and the Jews deserved to die in the Holocaust according to you. BTW the
Spanish Inquisition wasn't to keen on the Jews or protestants either. Of
course as I'm sure you don't know the Spanish Inquisition was not the
only one.
What your rant has to do with the covering-up of sex abuse, the enabling
of sex abusers and the other evil in the RCC I'm not sure
Go after the larger number of sex abusers. Step fathers, coaches,
teachers, and civil servants. You'll get a lot more abusers and
identify many times the victims.
I'm for going after all abusers wherever they are. However I'm also
believe that those people in organisations that covered-up the abuse and
worse allowed that abuse to continue/enable them e.g. Harrington case in
Tas should be brought to justice.
Mattb
2020-05-08 16:27:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem
No that isn't truth. Any that disagreed with the RCC were victims.
You do know the inquisitions went on for centuries.
Post by Petzl
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No unless you are calling history "crap media opinion". I do
believe the RCC as a religious institution is crap.
Post by Petzl
Bolsheviks committed the greatest human slaughter in modern
history,and the fact that the world is largely ignorant and uncaring
about this fact is proof that the global media are in the hands of the
perpetrators
Yes they killed many as did China and the Catholic Church.
Ned Latham
2020-05-08 17:56:56 UTC
Permalink
----snip----
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem
No that isn't truth.
Yes, it is. It was driven by Ferdinand and Isabella, crusading against
Islam and uniting Spain.
Post by Mattb
Any that disagreed with the RCC were victims.
That was the case from the time of Constantine the so-called Great.

----snip----
Petzl
2020-05-08 22:40:13 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 08 May 2020 12:56:56 -0500, Ned Latham
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem
No that isn't truth.
Yes, it is. It was driven by Ferdinand and Isabella, crusading against
Islam and uniting Spain.
Post by Mattb
Any that disagreed with the RCC were victims.
That was the case from the time of Constantine the so-called Great.
----snip----
Correct, absolutely
You would think that some would get a clue.
--
Petzl
"It is very easy to fool the people
but difficult to convince them that they HAVE been fooled!"
Mattb
2020-05-09 03:13:45 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 08 May 2020 12:56:56 -0500, Ned Latham
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem
No that isn't truth.
Yes, it is. It was driven by Ferdinand and Isabella, crusading against
Islam and uniting Spain.
I said all the inquisition, Petzl wants to limit discussion to the
Spanish inquisition
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Any that disagreed with the RCC were victims.
That was the case from the time of Constantine the so-called Great.
So true.
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Petzl
2020-05-09 03:37:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem
No that isn't truth.
Yes, it is. It was driven by Ferdinand and Isabella, crusading against
Islam and uniting Spain.
I said all the inquisition, Petzl wants to limit discussion to the
Spanish inquisition
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Any that disagreed with the RCC were victims.
That was the case from the time of Constantine the so-called Great.
So true.
Do even a little bit of research!
Muslims started invading Spain and Portugal in the early 700s. For
large periods of time muslims did not persecute christians or jews who
were free to exercise their religion.

But with new changes in rulers and more fundamentalist muslims in
control they began to persecute. Later when christians reconquered
large areas the kings did not persecute muslims or jews.

But when Isabel and Ferdinand came to the throne and reconquered the
last muslim kingdom in Spain they expected all muslims and jews to
convert to christianity.

Those who did not were expelled from Spain.

The inquisition was an institution that investigated and prosecuted
those who were thought to have made a false conversion.

It was a brutal regime, but so were the muslims who persecutes
christians and jews.
--
Petzl
European countries which banned Muslim so called “refugees”.

Hungary: 0 terror casualties
Poland: 0 terror casualties
Slovakia: 0 terror casualties
Czechia: 0 terror casualties

Only 660 out of 854,870 net migrants from 2011-2016
to Australia were from Europe!
While up to 504,010 were invaders from third world Moslem countries.
Dechucka
2020-05-09 03:43:27 UTC
Permalink
snip
Post by Petzl
The inquisition was an institution that investigated and prosecuted
those who were thought to have made a false conversion.
It was a brutal regime, but so were the muslims who persecutes
christians and jews.
So the Christians are just as bad as the Moslem's you despise. I've been
telling you this for ages so it is great you've come over to the light
side from the darkness of your bigotry and racism
Mattb
2020-05-09 04:57:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem
No that isn't truth.
Yes, it is. It was driven by Ferdinand and Isabella, crusading against
Islam and uniting Spain.
I said all the inquisition, Petzl wants to limit discussion to the
Spanish inquisition
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Any that disagreed with the RCC were victims.
That was the case from the time of Constantine the so-called Great.
So true.
Do even a little bit of research!
Muslims started invading Spain and Portugal in the early 700s. For
large periods of time muslims did not persecute christians or jews who
were free to exercise their religion.
You do know I was taking of all the inquisitions are you are only
about the one.
Post by Petzl
But with new changes in rulers and more fundamentalist muslims in
control they began to persecute. Later when christians reconquered
large areas the kings did not persecute muslims or jews.
But when Isabel and Ferdinand came to the throne and reconquered the
last muslim kingdom in Spain they expected all muslims and jews to
convert to christianity.
Those who did not were expelled from Spain.
The inquisition was an institution that investigated and prosecuted
those who were thought to have made a false conversion.
It was a brutal regime, but so were the muslims who persecutes
christians and jews.
Fundamentalist assholes are almost always brutal IMO.
Petzl
2020-05-09 06:19:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem
No that isn't truth.
Yes, it is. It was driven by Ferdinand and Isabella, crusading against
Islam and uniting Spain.
I said all the inquisition, Petzl wants to limit discussion to the
Spanish inquisition
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Any that disagreed with the RCC were victims.
That was the case from the time of Constantine the so-called Great.
So true.
Do even a little bit of research!
Muslims started invading Spain and Portugal in the early 700s. For
large periods of time muslims did not persecute christians or jews who
were free to exercise their religion.
You do know I was taking of all the inquisitions are you are only
about the one.
Post by Petzl
But with new changes in rulers and more fundamentalist muslims in
control they began to persecute. Later when christians reconquered
large areas the kings did not persecute muslims or jews.
But when Isabel and Ferdinand came to the throne and reconquered the
last muslim kingdom in Spain they expected all muslims and jews to
convert to christianity.
Those who did not were expelled from Spain.
The inquisition was an institution that investigated and prosecuted
those who were thought to have made a false conversion.
It was a brutal regime, but so were the muslims who persecutes
christians and jews.
Fundamentalist assholes are almost always brutal IMO.
You need to know Islam is about insurgency (Stealth invasion).
<https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/05/the_greatest_murder_machine_in_history.html>
https://is.gd/Fq5wj0

This style of invasion was started by Mohammad fleeing Mecca in AD622
to Jewish run Yathrib (Medina) to join his other "refugees" from Mecca
who were welcomed by the Jews who controlled the city.
(insurgents who Mecca found to be criminals from AD610)

Within 5 years Mohammad had driven out, executed, or enslaved every
Jew living in Yathrib/Medina.

Then conquered the Arab peninsular. Moslem's celebrate the day of
conquest AD622 as day 1 of the Islamic calendar (Hijrah).

For around 1,400 years Islam has produced the major majority of the
worlds “refugees”! Always fleeing from what they created! Still the
same today!

Welcomed by idiots who refuse to learn from history
--
Petzl
New South Wales health minister Brad Hazzard, Pro-Abortionist!
Should be the one to lance the fetus larynx so no-one can hear the unborn scream.
Most do not know this is part of the abortion "procedure"
Dechucka
2020-05-09 06:45:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem
No that isn't truth.
Yes, it is. It was driven by Ferdinand and Isabella, crusading against
Islam and uniting Spain.
I said all the inquisition, Petzl wants to limit discussion to the
Spanish inquisition
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Any that disagreed with the RCC were victims.
That was the case from the time of Constantine the so-called Great.
So true.
Do even a little bit of research!
Muslims started invading Spain and Portugal in the early 700s. For
large periods of time muslims did not persecute christians or jews who
were free to exercise their religion.
You do know I was taking of all the inquisitions are you are only
about the one.
Post by Petzl
But with new changes in rulers and more fundamentalist muslims in
control they began to persecute. Later when christians reconquered
large areas the kings did not persecute muslims or jews.
But when Isabel and Ferdinand came to the throne and reconquered the
last muslim kingdom in Spain they expected all muslims and jews to
convert to christianity.
Those who did not were expelled from Spain.
The inquisition was an institution that investigated and prosecuted
those who were thought to have made a false conversion.
It was a brutal regime, but so were the muslims who persecutes
christians and jews.
Fundamentalist assholes are almost always brutal IMO.
You need to know Islam is about insurgency (Stealth invasion).
And as you clearly stated previously the Christians are equally as bad,
well except, as you claimed, your God cracked a hissie about the Chinese
changing the Bible and sent SARS-Cov-19
Petzl
2020-05-09 07:51:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem
No that isn't truth.
Yes, it is. It was driven by Ferdinand and Isabella, crusading against
Islam and uniting Spain.
I said all the inquisition, Petzl wants to limit discussion to the
Spanish inquisition
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Any that disagreed with the RCC were victims.
That was the case from the time of Constantine the so-called Great.
So true.
Do even a little bit of research!
Muslims started invading Spain and Portugal in the early 700s. For
large periods of time muslims did not persecute christians or jews who
were free to exercise their religion.
You do know I was taking of all the inquisitions are you are only
about the one.
Post by Petzl
But with new changes in rulers and more fundamentalist muslims in
control they began to persecute. Later when christians reconquered
large areas the kings did not persecute muslims or jews.
But when Isabel and Ferdinand came to the throne and reconquered the
last muslim kingdom in Spain they expected all muslims and jews to
convert to christianity.
Those who did not were expelled from Spain.
The inquisition was an institution that investigated and prosecuted
those who were thought to have made a false conversion.
It was a brutal regime, but so were the muslims who persecutes
christians and jews.
Fundamentalist assholes are almost always brutal IMO.
You need to know Islam is about insurgency (Stealth invasion).
And as you clearly stated previously the Christians are equally as bad,
well except, as you claimed, your God cracked a hissie about the Chinese
changing the Bible and sent SARS-Cov-19
More twisting, lying, spinning, deceit
The ONLY reason Australia and USA have done well is because of their
Christian History

Whereas Moslem countries are all kleptocratic shitholes is because of
their being raised by Islamic "values"
--
Petzl
The Christian belief and fact is Moslems are deceived.
Like Schizophrenics, they need therapy;
Not confirmation of their delusions.
The recognized place of worship in a Christian Nation is a Christian Church.
Mosques are the recognized place of worship only in Moslem countries
Australia's only legally defined God is our Christian God whose compound redemptive name is Lord Jesus Christ
Something as simple as denying Moslems a place to pray is all it takes to make them leave voluntarily and peacefully.
Dechucka
2020-05-09 08:29:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem
No that isn't truth.
Yes, it is. It was driven by Ferdinand and Isabella, crusading against
Islam and uniting Spain.
I said all the inquisition, Petzl wants to limit discussion to the
Spanish inquisition
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Any that disagreed with the RCC were victims.
That was the case from the time of Constantine the so-called Great.
So true.
Do even a little bit of research!
Muslims started invading Spain and Portugal in the early 700s. For
large periods of time muslims did not persecute christians or jews who
were free to exercise their religion.
You do know I was taking of all the inquisitions are you are only
about the one.
Post by Petzl
But with new changes in rulers and more fundamentalist muslims in
control they began to persecute. Later when christians reconquered
large areas the kings did not persecute muslims or jews.
But when Isabel and Ferdinand came to the throne and reconquered the
last muslim kingdom in Spain they expected all muslims and jews to
convert to christianity.
Those who did not were expelled from Spain.
The inquisition was an institution that investigated and prosecuted
those who were thought to have made a false conversion.
It was a brutal regime, but so were the muslims who persecutes
christians and jews.
Fundamentalist assholes are almost always brutal IMO.
You need to know Islam is about insurgency (Stealth invasion).
And as you clearly stated previously the Christians are equally as bad,
well except, as you claimed, your God cracked a hissie about the Chinese
changing the Bible and sent SARS-Cov-19
More twisting, lying, spinning, deceit
That is what you've claimed. All there and everyone who could be
bothered has seen it

snip the subject change
Ned Latham
2020-05-09 10:17:27 UTC
Permalink
----snip----
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
You need to know Islam is about insurgency (Stealth invasion).
And as you clearly stated previously
You shouldn't need lies, Dopey.
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
the Christians are equally as bad,
Nope. They have no qualms about massacre, but Christianity doesn't
preach it; Islam does, and has more murders to its name than all
the mass murders of the twentieth century combined. 170 million
in Africa and India alone.
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
well except, as you claimed, your God cracked a hissie about the
Chinese changing the Bible and sent SARS-Cov-19
More twisting, lying, spinning, deceit
The ONLY reason Australia and USA have done well is because of their
Christian History
The advances made since the Renaissance were made *in spite of*
Christianity, not because of it.
Post by Petzl
Whereas Moslem countries are all kleptocratic shitholes is because
of their being raised by Islamic "values"
True. Just like Christian countries from the Late Empire until about
the 17th century in protestant countries, later in Catholic countries.
Mattb
2020-05-09 17:28:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem
No that isn't truth.
Yes, it is. It was driven by Ferdinand and Isabella, crusading against
Islam and uniting Spain.
I said all the inquisition, Petzl wants to limit discussion to the
Spanish inquisition
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Mattb
Any that disagreed with the RCC were victims.
That was the case from the time of Constantine the so-called Great.
So true.
Do even a little bit of research!
Muslims started invading Spain and Portugal in the early 700s. For
large periods of time muslims did not persecute christians or jews who
were free to exercise their religion.
You do know I was taking of all the inquisitions are you are only
about the one.
Post by Petzl
But with new changes in rulers and more fundamentalist muslims in
control they began to persecute. Later when christians reconquered
large areas the kings did not persecute muslims or jews.
But when Isabel and Ferdinand came to the throne and reconquered the
last muslim kingdom in Spain they expected all muslims and jews to
convert to christianity.
Those who did not were expelled from Spain.
The inquisition was an institution that investigated and prosecuted
those who were thought to have made a false conversion.
It was a brutal regime, but so were the muslims who persecutes
christians and jews.
Fundamentalist assholes are almost always brutal IMO.
You need to know Islam is about insurgency (Stealth invasion).
<https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/05/the_greatest_murder_machine_in_history.html>
https://is.gd/Fq5wj0
The RCC murdered thousands and thousands of Christians during the
Inquisitions and stole much property and land.
Post by Petzl
This style of invasion was started by Mohammad fleeing Mecca in AD622
to Jewish run Yathrib (Medina) to join his other "refugees" from Mecca
who were welcomed by the Jews who controlled the city.
(insurgents who Mecca found to be criminals from AD610)
Within 5 years Mohammad had driven out, executed, or enslaved every
Jew living in Yathrib/Medina.
Then conquered the Arab peninsular. Moslem's celebrate the day of
conquest AD622 as day 1 of the Islamic calendar (Hijrah).
For around 1,400 years Islam has produced the major majority of the
worlds “refugees”! Always fleeing from what they created! Still the
same today!
Welcomed by idiots who refuse to learn from history
Yes the Islamic fanatics have much in common with the RCC of the
past. RCC lost control of governments and armies sadly Islamic
nutjobs still have it.

Muhammad was a freak to me. A pedophile and total freak. He should
have been buried in pig guts with his head aiming north.
Patrick B
2020-05-09 20:05:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
The RCC murdered thousands and thousands of Christians during the
Inquisitions and stole much property and land.
Pure and simple lie.
Post by Mattb
Muhammad was a freak to me. A pedophile and total freak. He should
have been buried in pig guts with his head aiming north.
Gee. You sound like an expert on pedophyles. Are you?
Mattb
2020-05-09 22:47:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mattb
The RCC murdered thousands and thousands of Christians during the
Inquisitions and stole much property and land.
Pure and simple lie.
Actually historical facts.
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mattb
Muhammad was a freak to me. A pedophile and total freak. He should
have been buried in pig guts with his head aiming north.
Gee. You sound like an expert on pedophyles. Are you?
No that is Patrick Barker of Dayton, OH.
Dechucka
2020-05-09 23:06:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mattb
The RCC murdered thousands and thousands of Christians during the
Inquisitions and stole much property and land.
Pure and simple lie.
Actually historical facts.
While the Inquisitions were first set up to persecute the Cathars, who
were Christians, the moved onto Jews, Muslims, witches, scientists and
other non-Catholic Christians. Thus it may by hard to divvy up which
group the thousands of deaths came from.
I note that even though JP2 apologised for the 'excessive violence' of
the Inquisition in 2000 there is a great push within the RCC to say it
wasn't really that bad ie Cardinal George Cottier. Interesting parallel
to Patdick's attitude to child abuse in the RCC

snip
Patrick B
2020-05-10 13:26:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mattb
The RCC murdered thousands and thousands of Christians during the
Inquisitions and stole much property and land.
Pure and simple lie.
Actually historical facts.
While the Inquisitions were first set up to persecute the Cathars, who
were Christians, the moved onto Jews, Muslims, witches, scientists and
other non-Catholic Christians. Thus it may by hard to divvy up which
group the thousands of deaths came from.
I note that even though JP2 apologised for the 'excessive violence' of
the Inquisition in 2000 there is a great push within the RCC to say it
wasn't really that bad ie Cardinal George Cottier. Interesting parallel
to Patdick's attitude to child abuse in the RCC
The different inquisitions took place in different places, at
different times, under various peoples. The pope did not authorize
the murder or torture of any human beings. Those who were killed were
murdered by civil authorities - again for various reasons. Sometimes
for religion. Sometimes for theft of their property. Sometimes for
the pure power and pleasure of it. The RCC did not gain possessions
or property from any of this.
Dechucka
2020-05-10 20:36:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mattb
The RCC murdered thousands and thousands of Christians during the
Inquisitions and stole much property and land.
Pure and simple lie.
Actually historical facts.
While the Inquisitions were first set up to persecute the Cathars, who
were Christians, the moved onto Jews, Muslims, witches, scientists and
other non-Catholic Christians. Thus it may by hard to divvy up which
group the thousands of deaths came from.
I note that even though JP2 apologised for the 'excessive violence' of
the Inquisition in 2000 there is a great push within the RCC to say it
wasn't really that bad ie Cardinal George Cottier. Interesting parallel
to Patdick's attitude to child abuse in the RCC
The different inquisitions took place in different places, at
different times, under various peoples.
Yes that is correct, well done
Post by Patrick B
The pope did not authorize
the murder or torture of any human beings.
I haven't seen the original papers setting up the Inquisitions
Post by Patrick B
Those who were killed were
murdered by civil authorities - again for various reasons. Sometimes
for religion. Sometimes for theft of their property. Sometimes for
the pure power and pleasure of it. The RCC did not gain possessions
or property from any of this.
The Inquisition was a religious not a civil court.
Patrick B
2020-05-10 21:25:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mattb
The RCC murdered thousands and thousands of Christians during the
Inquisitions and stole much property and land.
Pure and simple lie.
Actually historical facts.
While the Inquisitions were first set up to persecute the Cathars, who
were Christians, the moved onto Jews, Muslims, witches, scientists and
other non-Catholic Christians. Thus it may by hard to divvy up which
group the thousands of deaths came from.
I note that even though JP2 apologised for the 'excessive violence' of
the Inquisition in 2000 there is a great push within the RCC to say it
wasn't really that bad ie Cardinal George Cottier. Interesting parallel
to Patdick's attitude to child abuse in the RCC
The different inquisitions took place in different places, at
different times, under various peoples.
Yes that is correct, well done
Post by Patrick B
The pope did not authorize
the murder or torture of any human beings.
I haven't seen the original papers setting up the Inquisitions
Post by Patrick B
Those who were killed were
murdered by civil authorities - again for various reasons. Sometimes
for religion. Sometimes for theft of their property. Sometimes for
the pure power and pleasure of it. The RCC did not gain possessions
or property from any of this.
The Inquisition was a religious not a civil court.
Those who were killed were
murdered by civil authorities - again for various reasons. Sometimes
for religion. Sometimes for theft of their property. Sometimes for
the pure power and pleasure of it. The RCC did not gain possessions
or property from any of this.
Dechucka
2020-05-10 21:40:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mattb
The RCC murdered thousands and thousands of Christians during the
Inquisitions and stole much property and land.
Pure and simple lie.
Actually historical facts.
While the Inquisitions were first set up to persecute the Cathars, who
were Christians, the moved onto Jews, Muslims, witches, scientists and
other non-Catholic Christians. Thus it may by hard to divvy up which
group the thousands of deaths came from.
I note that even though JP2 apologised for the 'excessive violence' of
the Inquisition in 2000 there is a great push within the RCC to say it
wasn't really that bad ie Cardinal George Cottier. Interesting parallel
to Patdick's attitude to child abuse in the RCC
The different inquisitions took place in different places, at
different times, under various peoples.
Yes that is correct, well done
Post by Patrick B
The pope did not authorize
the murder or torture of any human beings.
I haven't seen the original papers setting up the Inquisitions
Post by Patrick B
Those who were killed were
murdered by civil authorities - again for various reasons. Sometimes
for religion. Sometimes for theft of their property. Sometimes for
the pure power and pleasure of it. The RCC did not gain possessions
or property from any of this.
The Inquisition was a religious not a civil court.
Those who were killed were
murdered by civil authorities
OK you are obviously now in total denial
Post by Patrick B
- again for various reasons. Sometimes
for religion. Sometimes for theft of their property. Sometimes for
the pure power and pleasure of it.
So what did the Inquisition do over the ~700 years of it existence?
Post by Patrick B
The RCC did not gain possessions
or property from any of this.
Totally irrelevant even if it is true
Mattb
2020-05-10 16:21:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mattb
The RCC murdered thousands and thousands of Christians during the
Inquisitions and stole much property and land.
Pure and simple lie.
Actually historical facts.
While the Inquisitions were first set up to persecute the Cathars, who
were Christians, the moved onto Jews, Muslims, witches, scientists and
other non-Catholic Christians. Thus it may by hard to divvy up which
group the thousands of deaths came from.
True I've only looked at this in general way. The RCC killed it
seems any who would not bow before it.
Post by Dechucka
I note that even though JP2 apologised for the 'excessive violence' of
the Inquisition in 2000 there is a great push within the RCC to say it
wasn't really that bad ie Cardinal George Cottier. Interesting parallel
to Patdick's attitude to child abuse in the RCC
Yet you see people here want to punish those they call heretics,
which seems to still be any who will not bow before the RCC.
Post by Dechucka
snip
Patrick B
2020-05-10 16:58:58 UTC
Permalink
The RCC killed it>seems any who would not bow before it.
And you wonder why no one asks you for your opinion.
Mattb
2020-05-10 18:02:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
The RCC killed it>seems any who would not bow before it.
And you wonder why no one asks you for your opinion.
I give it anyway. You is powerless, a wuss, and IMO a pedophile.
Petzl
2020-05-08 22:38:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem
No that isn't truth. Any that disagreed with the RCC were victims.
You do know the inquisitions went on for centuries.
Post by Petzl
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No unless you are calling history "crap media opinion". I do
believe the RCC as a religious institution is crap.
Often it is WWII is opinion omitting real truths,
Flogged out in books.

Same missinformation touted about the reasons for the Spanish
inquisition.
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Bolsheviks committed the greatest human slaughter in modern
history,and the fact that the world is largely ignorant and uncaring
about this fact is proof that the global media are in the hands of the
perpetrators
Yes they killed many as did China and the Catholic Church.
--
Petzl
"It is very easy to fool the people
but difficult to convince them that they HAVE been fooled!"
Dechucka
2020-05-08 22:48:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Petzl
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is one sick organization, the RCC.
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No the RCC has a history of great evil. The inquisitions alone show
great evil and the tradition of pedophilia just the icing on the cake.
The SPANISH inquisition was necessary defense against Islam.
Not Christian a Moslem
No that isn't truth. Any that disagreed with the RCC were victims.
You do know the inquisitions went on for centuries.
Post by Petzl
Your brain is just being frazzled by crap media opinion.
No unless you are calling history "crap media opinion". I do
believe the RCC as a religious institution is crap.
Often it is WWII is opinion omitting real truths,
What has WW2 got to do with the Inquisition?
Post by Petzl
Flogged out in books.
Do you still celebrate May 10, 1933?
Post by Petzl
Same missinformation touted about the reasons for the Spanish
inquisition.
Which misinformation is about the reasons for the inquisition.
Patrick B
2020-05-08 13:54:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest
CANBERRA, Australia — Australian Cardinal George Pell knew that a
notorious pedophile priest had been sexually abusing children years
before his arrest and had been aware of the Catholic Church's clergy
abuse problem since the early 1970s, a government inquiry concluded.
Sadly just confirms what was basically known about Pell's role in the
cover-up of abuse and the movement of abusers to keep abusing by the RCC
WAHHHHHHHHHH
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is like saying all Irish men - world wide - are alcoholics.
Or that the world wide epidemic of black men being involved in the
criminal justice system should have better reprocussions.
Dechucka
2020-05-08 20:29:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest
CANBERRA, Australia — Australian Cardinal George Pell knew that a
notorious pedophile priest had been sexually abusing children years
before his arrest and had been aware of the Catholic Church's clergy
abuse problem since the early 1970s, a government inquiry concluded.
Sadly just confirms what was basically known about Pell's role in the
cover-up of abuse and the movement of abusers to keep abusing by the RCC
WAHHHHHHHHHH
Come on it's not the surprising given the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC around the world and that the RCC enabled the abusers to keep
abusing.
That is like saying all Irish men - world wide - are alcoholics.
Or that the world wide epidemic of black men being involved in the
criminal justice system should have better reprocussions.
Not all the Catholics were involved in the world wide cover up of abuse
in the RCC and the enabling of the abusers to keep abusing.
Fran
2020-05-08 01:09:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest
CANBERRA, Australia — Australian Cardinal George Pell knew that a
notorious pedophile priest had been sexually abusing children years
before his arrest and had been aware of the Catholic Church's clergy
abuse problem since the early 1970s, a government inquiry concluded.
Sadly just confirms what was basically known about Pell's role in the
cover-up of abuse and the movement of abusers to keep abusing  by the RCC
Yep. I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
Patrick B
2020-05-08 13:58:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fran
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest
CANBERRA, Australia — Australian Cardinal George Pell knew that a
notorious pedophile priest had been sexually abusing children years
before his arrest and had been aware of the Catholic Church's clergy
abuse problem since the early 1970s, a government inquiry concluded.
Sadly just confirms what was basically known about Pell's role in the
cover-up of abuse and the movement of abusers to keep abusing  by the RCC
Yep. I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Dechucka
2020-05-08 20:50:48 UTC
Permalink
snip
Post by Patrick B
Post by Fran
Yep. I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Fran is a 'looser' what?

I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution may
not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a few
boats at Yorktown and that was it.
Patrick B
2020-05-08 22:43:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Post by Fran
Yep. I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Fran is a 'looser' what?
Pick something, anything....
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution may
not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a few
boats at Yorktown and that was it.
Thank you for the history lesson.
Now tell us how many children that Charlemagne had.
Dechucka
2020-05-08 22:58:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Post by Fran
Yep. I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Fran is a 'looser' what?
Pick something, anything....
Why do you think she is a 'looser'? What is a looser?
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution may
not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a few
boats at Yorktown and that was it.
Thank you for the history lesson.
My pleasure, I love overcoming ignorance wherever it is.
Post by Patrick B
Now tell us how many children that Charlemagne had.
His greatest child was Europe of course. When it comes to children he
was a bit like a Catholic priest in an orphanage and had heaps and heaps
of children. You have been educated, here endeth the lesson.
Patrick B
2020-05-09 13:31:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Post by Fran
Yep. I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Fran is a 'looser' what?
Pick something, anything....
Why do you think she is a 'looser'? What is a looser?
Like I've said many time... I calls em like I sees em.
What is a looser?
I don't believe I called her a looser.
I called her a loozer.

A loozer is a person who can't get back up again and allows
circumstances to define their future.
A loozer defines a personwho does very unappropriate things so
unattractive that you don't stand a chance of getting down to their
level. It has nothing to do with race, looks, religion, culture,
fagness, etc.

Any more questions?
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution may
not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a few
boats at Yorktown and that was it.
Thank you for the history lesson.
My pleasure, I love overcoming ignorance wherever it is.
Post by Patrick B
Now tell us how many children that Charlemagne had.
His greatest child was Europe of course. When it comes to children he
was a bit like a Catholic priest in an orphanage and had heaps and heaps
of children. You have been educated, here endeth the lesson.
tell us how many children that Charlemagne had.
Dechucka
2020-05-09 20:44:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Post by Fran
Yep. I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Fran is a 'looser' what?
Pick something, anything....
Why do you think she is a 'looser'? What is a looser?
Like I've said many time... I calls em like I sees em.
What is a looser?
I don't believe I called her a looser.
I called her a loozer.
A loozer is a person who can't get back up again and allows
circumstances to define their future.
A loozer defines a personwho does very unappropriate things so
unattractive that you don't stand a chance of getting down to their
level. It has nothing to do with race, looks, religion, culture,
fagness, etc.
Any more questions?
What a funny word, I could understand if is it was based on 'loser' but
it seems to be based on a common Usenet misspelling'
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution may
not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a few
boats at Yorktown and that was it.
Thank you for the history lesson.
My pleasure, I love overcoming ignorance wherever it is.
Post by Patrick B
Now tell us how many children that Charlemagne had.
His greatest child was Europe of course. When it comes to children he
was a bit like a Catholic priest in an orphanage and had heaps and heaps
of children. You have been educated, here endeth the lesson.
tell us how many children that Charlemagne had.
I did, When it comes to children he was a bit like a Catholic priest in
an orphanage and had heaps and heaps of children. You have been
educated, here endeth the lesson.
Patrick B
2020-05-09 21:28:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Post by Fran
Yep. I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Fran is a 'looser' what?
Pick something, anything....
Why do you think she is a 'looser'? What is a looser?
Like I've said many time... I calls em like I sees em.
What is a looser?
I don't believe I called her a looser.
I called her a loozer.
A loozer is a person who can't get back up again and allows
circumstances to define their future.
A loozer defines a personwho does very unappropriate things so
unattractive that you don't stand a chance of getting down to their
level. It has nothing to do with race, looks, religion, culture,
fagness, etc.
Any more questions?
What a funny word, I could understand if is it was based on 'loser' but
it seems to be based on a common Usenet misspelling'
I bin known to mis-spell loss o words when I am speaking down to a
person and want them to unnerstand.
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution may
not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a few
boats at Yorktown and that was it.
Thank you for the history lesson.
My pleasure, I love overcoming ignorance wherever it is.
Post by Patrick B
Now tell us how many children that Charlemagne had.
His greatest child was Europe of course. When it comes to children he
was a bit like a Catholic priest in an orphanage and had heaps and heaps
of children. You have been educated, here endeth the lesson.
tell us how many children that Charlemagne had.
I did, When it comes to children he was a bit like a Catholic priest in
an orphanage and had heaps and heaps of children. You have been
educated, here endeth the lesson.
<Yawn> If I had wanted a fairy tale story, I would have asked for it.
Dechucka
2020-05-09 21:41:34 UTC
Permalink
snip
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
A loozer is a person who can't get back up again and allows
circumstances to define their future.
A loozer defines a personwho does very unappropriate things so
unattractive that you don't stand a chance of getting down to their
level. It has nothing to do with race, looks, religion, culture,
fagness, etc.
Any more questions?
What a funny word, I could understand if is it was based on 'loser' but
it seems to be based on a common Usenet misspelling'
I bin known to mis-spell loss o words when I am speaking down to a
person and want them to unnerstand.
Really? You misspell words when speaking? Must be a septic thing
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution may
not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a few
boats at Yorktown and that was it.
Thank you for the history lesson.
My pleasure, I love overcoming ignorance wherever it is.
Post by Patrick B
Now tell us how many children that Charlemagne had.
His greatest child was Europe of course. When it comes to children he
was a bit like a Catholic priest in an orphanage and had heaps and heaps
of children. You have been educated, here endeth the lesson.
tell us how many children that Charlemagne had.
I did, When it comes to children he was a bit like a Catholic priest in
an orphanage and had heaps and heaps of children. You have been
educated, here endeth the lesson.
<Yawn> If I had wanted a fairy tale story, I would have asked for it.
So go along to your Church and ask your priest, make sure you're
sitting down or 'bums to the wall'
Patrick B
2020-05-10 13:28:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
A loozer is a person who can't get back up again and allows
circumstances to define their future.
A loozer defines a personwho does very unappropriate things so
unattractive that you don't stand a chance of getting down to their
level. It has nothing to do with race, looks, religion, culture,
fagness, etc.
Any more questions?
What a funny word, I could understand if is it was based on 'loser' but
it seems to be based on a common Usenet misspelling'
I bin known to mis-spell loss o words when I am speaking down to a
person and want them to unnerstand.
Really? You misspell words when speaking? Must be a septic thing
"SPEAKING DOWN" to loozers.
It is somethimes the only way they can understand.
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution may
not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a few
boats at Yorktown and that was it.
Thank you for the history lesson.
My pleasure, I love overcoming ignorance wherever it is.
Post by Patrick B
Now tell us how many children that Charlemagne had.
His greatest child was Europe of course. When it comes to children he
was a bit like a Catholic priest in an orphanage and had heaps and heaps
of children. You have been educated, here endeth the lesson.
tell us how many children that Charlemagne had.
I did, When it comes to children he was a bit like a Catholic priest in
an orphanage and had heaps and heaps of children. You have been
educated, here endeth the lesson.
<Yawn> If I had wanted a fairy tale story, I would have asked for it.
So go along to your Church and ask your priest, make sure you're
sitting down or 'bums to the wall'
You have enough fairy tales for everyone.
My priest is too busy for the likes of you.
Dechucka
2020-05-10 20:41:43 UTC
Permalink
snip
Post by Patrick B
"SPEAKING DOWN" to loozers.
It is somethimes the only way they can understand.
Really? You misspell words when speaking? Must be a septic thing

snip
Post by Patrick B
You have enough fairy tales for everyone.
My priest is too busy for the likes of you.
Are you suggesting I'm far to old for his sexual preference?
Patrick B
2020-05-10 21:27:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
"SPEAKING DOWN" to loozers.
It is somethimes the only way they can understand.
Really? You misspell words when speaking? Must be a septic thing
"SPEAKING DOWN" to loozers.
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
You have enough fairy tales for everyone.
My priest is too busy for the likes of you.
Are you suggesting I'm far to old for his sexual preference?
talk to matty. His dad is the Tier 2 Sexual Pervert on the Sexual
Offender's List in Skaggit County, WA.
Dechucka
2020-05-10 21:46:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
"SPEAKING DOWN" to loozers.
It is somethimes the only way they can understand.
Really? You misspell words when speaking? Must be a septic thing
"SPEAKING DOWN" to loozers.
How can you misspell when speaking?
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
You have enough fairy tales for everyone.
My priest is too busy for the likes of you.
Are you suggesting I'm far to old for his sexual preference?
talk to matty. His dad is the Tier 2 Sexual Pervert on the Sexual
Offender's List in Skaggit County, WA.
Fathers, Deacons, Priests, Brothers etc they were all into it in the RCC
Fran
2020-05-09 04:36:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Yep.  I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Fran is a 'looser' what?
I'm neither of those mispellings. :-))
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I used to correct people when they said 'Americans are stupid'. I no
longer bother to do so.
Post by Dechucka
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution may
not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a few
boats at Yorktown and that was it.
:-)) Did your message eventually get though to him or did the septic
just make idiot comments about YOU being from a penal colony (but not
him [poor ignorant thing]).
Patrick B
2020-05-09 13:34:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fran
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Yep.  I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Fran is a 'looser' what?
I'm neither of those mispellings. :-))
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I used to correct people when they said 'Americans are stupid'. I no
longer bother to do so.
You obviously learned the truth that ausies are much "stupider."
Post by Fran
Post by Dechucka
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution may
not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a few
boats at Yorktown and that was it.
:-)) Did your message eventually get though to him or did the septic
just make idiot comments about YOU being from a penal colony (but not
him [poor ignorant thing]).
Why would anything that France did or does cause anyone to wonder?
Why do all frenchies have sun burns under their arms?
Because they always raise their hands and give up on everything.
Dechucka
2020-05-09 20:47:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Yep.  I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Fran is a 'looser' what?
I'm neither of those mispellings.  :-))
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I used to correct people when they said 'Americans are stupid'.  I no
longer bother to do so.
Post by Dechucka
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution
may not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a
few boats at Yorktown and that was it.
:-))  Did your message eventually get though to him or did the septic
just make idiot comments about YOU being from a penal colony (but not
him [poor ignorant thing]).
Unlike Patdick, he just disappeared from the thread in the the light of
the facts. That's fair enough
Fran
2020-05-10 00:27:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Yep.  I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Fran is a 'looser' what?
I'm neither of those mispellings.  :-))
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I used to correct people when they said 'Americans are stupid'.  I no
longer bother to do so.
Post by Dechucka
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution
may not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a
few boats at Yorktown and that was it.
:-))  Did your message eventually get though to him or did the septic
just make idiot comments about YOU being from a penal colony (but not
him [poor ignorant thing]).
Unlike Patdick, he just disappeared from the thread in the the light of
the facts. That's fair enough
Yes. That is suggestive of him finally understanding the facts or doing
some research to check that what you said was right. Unlike Patrick who
never will. I can't understand why you don't just killfile him given
what a knob he is.
Patrick B
2020-05-10 13:30:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fran
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Yep.  I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Fran is a 'looser' what?
I'm neither of those mispellings.  :-))
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I used to correct people when they said 'Americans are stupid'.  I no
longer bother to do so.
Post by Dechucka
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution
may not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a
few boats at Yorktown and that was it.
:-))  Did your message eventually get though to him or did the septic
just make idiot comments about YOU being from a penal colony (but not
him [poor ignorant thing]).
Unlike Patdick, he just disappeared from the thread in the the light of
the facts. That's fair enough
Yes. That is suggestive of him finally understanding the facts or doing
some research to check that what you said was right. Unlike Patrick who
never will. I can't understand why you don't just killfile him given
what a knob he is.
The easier solution is get the hell out of the Catholic Newsgroup.
That way I won't have to confront your lies and insults about my
faith, my religion.
Dechucka
2020-05-10 20:48:42 UTC
Permalink
snip
Post by Patrick B
The easier solution is get the hell out of the Catholic Newsgroup.
That way I won't have to confront your lies and insults about my
faith, my religion.
It is not good for you to be in a newsgroup playing internet soggy
biscuits while claiming to be more pious then the other. I am your
reality check
Patrick B
2020-05-10 21:29:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
The easier solution is get the hell out of the Catholic Newsgroup.
That way I won't have to confront your lies and insults about my
faith, my religion.
It is not good for you to be in a newsgroup playing internet soggy
biscuits while claiming to be more pious then the other. I am your
reality check
I don't do soggy bisquits.
And I have never claimed to be more pious than others.
I certainly am a better person than most of you trolls & liars.
Dechucka
2020-05-10 21:50:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
The easier solution is get the hell out of the Catholic Newsgroup.
That way I won't have to confront your lies and insults about my
faith, my religion.
It is not good for you to be in a newsgroup playing internet soggy
biscuits while claiming to be more pious then the other. I am your
reality check
I don't do soggy bisquits.
And I have never claimed to be more pious than others.
I certainly am a better person than most of you trolls & liars.
Rather conceited of you
Dechucka
2020-05-10 20:46:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Yep.  I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Fran is a 'looser' what?
I'm neither of those mispellings.  :-))
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I used to correct people when they said 'Americans are stupid'.  I no
longer bother to do so.
Post by Dechucka
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution
may not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a
few boats at Yorktown and that was it.
:-))  Did your message eventually get though to him or did the septic
just make idiot comments about YOU being from a penal colony (but not
him [poor ignorant thing]).
Unlike Patdick, he just disappeared from the thread in the the light
of the facts. That's fair enough
Yes.  That is suggestive of him finally understanding the facts or doing
some research to check that what you said was right.  Unlike Patrick who
never will.  I can't understand why you don't just killfile him given
what a knob he is.
It is a burden put on me that I must point out hypocrisy and lies :-(
esp as I'm on this damm computer for so long (can't even get off it to
read at night now). Patdick is like the gun mob they are just in total
denial of the facts, it is amusing to watch them twist and squirm.
Patrick B
2020-05-10 21:30:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Patrick B
Yep.  I don't think the release of the reacted info would surprise many
people who aren't called Patrick the Idiot.
sez the loozer from the penal colony.
Fran is a 'looser' what?
I'm neither of those mispellings.  :-))
Post by Dechucka
I continue to be amazed how ignorant septics are of their own history.
I used to correct people when they said 'Americans are stupid'.  I no
longer bother to do so.
Post by Dechucka
I've just spent time, on TPG, explaining the role of France in the
American Revolution. Showing that without the French the revolution
may not have started let alone succeed. He thought the French had a
few boats at Yorktown and that was it.
:-))  Did your message eventually get though to him or did the septic
just make idiot comments about YOU being from a penal colony (but not
him [poor ignorant thing]).
Unlike Patdick, he just disappeared from the thread in the the light
of the facts. That's fair enough
Yes.  That is suggestive of him finally understanding the facts or doing
some research to check that what you said was right.  Unlike Patrick who
never will.  I can't understand why you don't just killfile him given
what a knob he is.
It is a burden put on me that I must point out hypocrisy and lies :-(
esp as I'm on this damm computer for so long (can't even get off it to
read at night now). Patdick is like the gun mob they are just in total
denial of the facts, it is amusing to watch them twist and squirm.
Did you have a question or concern for me?
Dechucka
2020-05-10 21:51:54 UTC
Permalink
snip
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Yes.  That is suggestive of him finally understanding the facts or doing
some research to check that what you said was right.  Unlike Patrick who
never will.  I can't understand why you don't just killfile him given
what a knob he is.
It is a burden put on me that I must point out hypocrisy and lies :-(
esp as I'm on this damm computer for so long (can't even get off it to
read at night now). Patdick is like the gun mob they are just in total
denial of the facts, it is amusing to watch them twist and squirm.
Did you have a question or concern for me?
No, the adults are talking so just wait till you're addressed
d***@cox.net
2020-05-09 13:35:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest
CANBERRA, Australia — Australian Cardinal George Pell knew that a
notorious pedophile priest had been sexually abusing children years
before his arrest and had been aware of the Catholic Church's clergy
abuse problem since the early 1970s, a government inquiry concluded.
Sadly just confirms what was basically known about Pell's role in the
cover-up of abuse and the movement of abusers to keep abusing by the RCC
The hateful lie ==> moving abusers specifically so they can keep on abusing.

Not a lot of back bone, chucky boy.
the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-05-09 20:48:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Inquiry: Pell knew of abuse by Australian pedophile priest
CANBERRA, Australia — Australian Cardinal George Pell knew that a
notorious pedophile priest had been sexually abusing children years
before his arrest and had been aware of the Catholic Church's clergy
abuse problem since the early 1970s, a government inquiry concluded.
Sadly just confirms what was basically known about Pell's role in the
cover-up of abuse and the movement of abusers to keep abusing by the RCC
The hateful lie ==> moving abusers specifically so they can keep on abusing.
They moved abusers, they didn't take them to the authorities.
Loading...