So you think Charles is a fit and proper person to be Australia's head of
If checks on a potential Aust Governor General revealed a similar record of
(public) infidelity to Charlie Windsor's track record then he/she would
NEVER be appointed to the role. The whole world knows that Charlie was
having sex out of marriage pretty much from the start. Do you think an
Aussie with a similar background would be appointed as our GG? Of course
they wouldn't, so why should Aussies have to put up with Charlie?
Roll on the republic. The British are stuck with him but we have a choice.
Dump the British monarch as Australia's head of state.
Post by Mike
Heretic wrote in message ...
Post by Heretic Post by The Organiser
So now its official. Australia is going to have a pair of confirmed
adulterers as our future Head/s of State - King Charles and Queen
Camilla. In the event that Charles is incapacitated at some future
point, Camilla will take over as regent and truly rule as the Queen of
Australia. Wooo hooo!
Time for an Australian republic methinks. Lets end this madness. The man
has no respect or credibility whatsoever. Its time we became a truly
Are you serious? Your condition for being Australia's head of state is
that they don't engage in sexual congress without benefit of clergy? Of
course we should be a republic, but not for that crass reason.
When we are a republic, what would you want to have happen if the head of
state indulges his or her sexual appetites other than with their legal
partner? The answer is that what they do with their privates is none of
our business. Is it?