Discussion:
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
Add Reply
MattB.
2020-03-12 00:05:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped

Spillane was charged in 2018 while serving a 10-year jail term.
The former clergyman was sentenced in 2017 over a series of assaults
on boys aged under 16 in the 1970s and 1980s at St Stanislaus College
in Bathurst.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain, Spillane preyed on homesick boys as young as 12 by inviting
them up to his room under the guise of providing comfort.
He's eligible for parole in November 2024.

https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
Dechucka
2020-03-12 01:30:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
Spillane was charged in 2018 while serving a 10-year jail term.
The former clergyman was sentenced in 2017 over a series of assaults
on boys aged under 16 in the 1970s and 1980s at St Stanislaus College
in Bathurst.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain, Spillane preyed on homesick boys as young as 12 by inviting
them up to his room under the guise of providing comfort.
He's eligible for parole in November 2024.
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
Oh well the bugger is in gaol
Mattb
2020-03-12 05:22:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
Spillane was charged in 2018 while serving a 10-year jail term.
The former clergyman was sentenced in 2017 over a series of assaults
on boys aged under 16 in the 1970s and 1980s at St Stanislaus College
in Bathurst.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain, Spillane preyed on homesick boys as young as 12 by inviting
them up to his room under the guise of providing comfort.
He's eligible for parole in November 2024.
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
Oh well the bugger is in gaol
Good place for him wish all the pedophile priest were with him.
d***@cox.net
2020-03-12 12:47:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
Spillane was charged in 2018 while serving a 10-year jail term.
The former clergyman was sentenced in 2017 over a series of assaults
on boys aged under 16 in the 1970s and 1980s at St Stanislaus College
in Bathurst.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain, Spillane preyed on homesick boys as young as 12 by inviting
them up to his room under the guise of providing comfort.
He's eligible for parole in November 2024.
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
Oh well the bugger is in gaol
Good place for him wish all the pedophile priest were with him.
That's good news that there is only one.
the dukester, American-American
Mattb
2020-03-12 18:03:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
Spillane was charged in 2018 while serving a 10-year jail term.
The former clergyman was sentenced in 2017 over a series of assaults
on boys aged under 16 in the 1970s and 1980s at St Stanislaus College
in Bathurst.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain, Spillane preyed on homesick boys as young as 12 by inviting
them up to his room under the guise of providing comfort.
He's eligible for parole in November 2024.
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
Oh well the bugger is in gaol
Good place for him wish all the pedophile priest were with him.
That's good news that there is only one.
Really did the RCC manage that good a coverup in Australia?
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-03-12 20:13:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
Spillane was charged in 2018 while serving a 10-year jail term.
The former clergyman was sentenced in 2017 over a series of assaults
on boys aged under 16 in the 1970s and 1980s at St Stanislaus College
in Bathurst.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain, Spillane preyed on homesick boys as young as 12 by inviting
them up to his room under the guise of providing comfort.
He's eligible for parole in November 2024.
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
Oh well the bugger is in gaol
Good place for him wish all the pedophile priest were with him.
That's good news that there is only one.
Really did the RCC manage that good a coverup in Australia?
They tried as they did around the world but were caught. Quite a few RCC
abusers in the slammer at the moment including Pell
Mattb
2020-03-12 23:55:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
Spillane was charged in 2018 while serving a 10-year jail term.
The former clergyman was sentenced in 2017 over a series of assaults
on boys aged under 16 in the 1970s and 1980s at St Stanislaus College
in Bathurst.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain, Spillane preyed on homesick boys as young as 12 by inviting
them up to his room under the guise of providing comfort.
He's eligible for parole in November 2024.
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
Oh well the bugger is in gaol
Good place for him wish all the pedophile priest were with him.
That's good news that there is only one.
Really did the RCC manage that good a coverup in Australia?
They tried as they did around the world but were caught. Quite a few RCC
abusers in the slammer at the moment including Pell
That is good in the USA we have to many Judges and politicians that
place being Catholic above truth and the teachings of Jesus.
d***@cox.net
2020-03-13 11:51:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
Spillane was charged in 2018 while serving a 10-year jail term.
The former clergyman was sentenced in 2017 over a series of assaults
on boys aged under 16 in the 1970s and 1980s at St Stanislaus College
in Bathurst.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain, Spillane preyed on homesick boys as young as 12 by inviting
them up to his room under the guise of providing comfort.
He's eligible for parole in November 2024.
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
Oh well the bugger is in gaol
Good place for him wish all the pedophile priest were with him.
That's good news that there is only one.
Really did the RCC manage that good a coverup in Australia?
They tried as they did around the world but were caught. Quite a few RCC
abusers in the slammer at the moment including Pell
That is good in the USA we have to many Judges and politicians that
place being Catholic above truth and the teachings of Jesus.
Whoops - red skin with black heart making up mega-lies as usual.
the dukester, American-American
Mattb
2020-03-13 20:07:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
Spillane was charged in 2018 while serving a 10-year jail term.
The former clergyman was sentenced in 2017 over a series of assaults
on boys aged under 16 in the 1970s and 1980s at St Stanislaus College
in Bathurst.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain, Spillane preyed on homesick boys as young as 12 by inviting
them up to his room under the guise of providing comfort.
He's eligible for parole in November 2024.
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
Oh well the bugger is in gaol
Good place for him wish all the pedophile priest were with him.
That's good news that there is only one.
Really did the RCC manage that good a coverup in Australia?
They tried as they did around the world but were caught. Quite a few RCC
abusers in the slammer at the moment including Pell
That is good in the USA we have to many Judges and politicians that
place being Catholic above truth and the teachings of Jesus.
Whoops
No that has been shown to be factual.
Post by d***@cox.net
- red skin with black heart making up mega-lies as usual.
That Earl Weber had to resort to racism shows I must have hit the
mark. Deceit and racism is quite normal for Earl Weber. That he is
limited to these type of replies shows the failure of his positions in
these debates.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
d***@cox.net
2020-03-14 18:03:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
- red skin with black heart making up mega-lies as usual.
That Earl Weber had to resort to racism shows I must have hit the
mark.
You did that long ago when you opened your box and threw out your stinking
voodoo shit.
Post by Mattb
Deceit and racism is quite normal for Earl Weber. That he is
limited to these type of replies shows the failure of his positions in
these debates.
Now you know where it really started - your teepee.
the dukester, American-American
Mattb
2020-03-14 19:25:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
- red skin with black heart making up mega-lies as usual.
That Earl Weber had to resort to racism shows I must have hit the
mark.
You did that long ago when you opened your box and threw out your stinking
voodoo shit.
Well you opened the box but joining Patrick in his lies.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Deceit and racism is quite normal for Earl Weber. That he is
limited to these type of replies shows the failure of his positions in
these debates.
Now you know where it really started - your teepee.
Don't have one.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-03-12 19:54:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
Spillane was charged in 2018 while serving a 10-year jail term.
The former clergyman was sentenced in 2017 over a series of assaults
on boys aged under 16 in the 1970s and 1980s at St Stanislaus College
in Bathurst.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain, Spillane preyed on homesick boys as young as 12 by inviting
them up to his room under the guise of providing comfort.
He's eligible for parole in November 2024.
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
Oh well the bugger is in gaol
Good place for him wish all the pedophile priest were with him.
That's good news that there is only one.
Only one abusing priest? What reality are you in.
d***@cox.net
2020-03-13 11:53:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Dechucka
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
Spillane was charged in 2018 while serving a 10-year jail term.
The former clergyman was sentenced in 2017 over a series of assaults
on boys aged under 16 in the 1970s and 1980s at St Stanislaus College
in Bathurst.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain, Spillane preyed on homesick boys as young as 12 by inviting
them up to his room under the guise of providing comfort.
He's eligible for parole in November 2024.
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
Oh well the bugger is in gaol
Good place for him wish all the pedophile priest were with him.
That's good news that there is only one.
Only one abusing priest? What reality are you in.
That's what matt suggested yesterday - "priest".
the dukester, American-American
Patrick B
2020-03-12 13:30:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
Spillane was charged in 2018 while serving a 10-year jail term.
The former clergyman was sentenced in 2017 over a series of assaults
on boys aged under 16 in the 1970s and 1980s at St Stanislaus College
in Bathurst.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain, Spillane preyed on homesick boys as young as 12 by inviting
them up to his room under the guise of providing comfort.
He's eligible for parole in November 2024.
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
Oh well the bugger is in gaol
When has that ever stopped you before?
Patrick B
2020-03-12 13:30:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
"Former (FORMER) priest Brian Spillane, 77, had pleaded not guilty
to the historical charge of buggery over the alleged incident with a
10-year-old on Shark Island in 1964. ( 1964 )....

His trial was due to begin on Monday but the Director of Public
Prosecutions has now withdrawn the charge.
"After careful consideration, the director determined there was no
reasonable prospect of a conviction and directed the charge not
proceed further," a DPP spokeswoman told AAP on Wednesday."

DUHHHHHHHHH.
Over 50 years ago.....
Mattb
2020-03-12 18:06:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
"Former (FORMER) priest Brian Spillane, 77, had pleaded not guilty
to the historical charge of buggery over the alleged incident with a
10-year-old on Shark Island in 1964. ( 1964 )....
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids. He was a good old boy
Catholic Priest. How many people within the RCC not only knew about
this but helped cover it up?
Post by Patrick B
His trial was due to begin on Monday but the Director of Public
Prosecutions has now withdrawn the charge.
"After careful consideration, the director determined there was no
reasonable prospect of a conviction and directed the charge not
proceed further," a DPP spokeswoman told AAP on Wednesday."
DUHHHHHHHHH.
Over 50 years ago.....
d***@cox.net
2020-03-13 11:53:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
"Former (FORMER) priest Brian Spillane, 77, had pleaded not guilty
to the historical charge of buggery over the alleged incident with a
10-year-old on Shark Island in 1964. ( 1964 )....
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-03-13 19:33:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
You;re are kidding aren't
d***@cox.net
2020-03-14 18:05:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
You;re are kidding aren't you?
Adult sexual contact with an underage minor is a crime and a serious moral
wrong. Pedophilia, by contrast, is a psychiatric disorder involving primary or
exclusive sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children (not just any person under
the age of 18), which — if acted on — is a crime and a serious moral wrong.
the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-03-14 19:24:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
You;re are kidding aren't you?
Adult sexual contact with an underage minor is a crime and a serious moral
wrong.
Correct
Post by d***@cox.net
Pedophilia, by contrast, is a psychiatric disorder involving primary or
exclusive sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children (not just any person under
the age of 18), which — if acted on — is a crime and a serious moral wrong.
Correct, nothing to do with fondness
d***@cox.net
2020-03-15 14:12:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
You;re are kidding aren't you?
Adult sexual contact with an underage minor is a crime and a serious moral
wrong.
Correct
Post by d***@cox.net
Pedophilia, by contrast, is a psychiatric disorder involving primary or
exclusive sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children (not just any person under
the age of 18), which — if acted on — is a crime and a serious moral wrong.
Correct, nothing to do with fondness
But sexual abuse means the fondness moves over to the more than just fondness.

Pedophilia and Child Sexual Abuse Are Two Different Things ...
https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2017/11/11/pedophilia-and-child-sexual-abuse-are...

Nov 11, 2017 · Adult sexual contact with an underage minor is a crime and a
serious moral wrong. Pedophilia, by contrast, is a psychiatric disorder
involving primary or exclusive sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children (not
just any person under the age of 18), which — if acted on — is a crime and a
serious moral wrong.
the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-03-15 19:09:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
You;re are kidding aren't you?
Adult sexual contact with an underage minor is a crime and a serious moral
wrong.
Correct
Post by d***@cox.net
Pedophilia, by contrast, is a psychiatric disorder involving primary or
exclusive sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children (not just any person under
the age of 18), which — if acted on — is a crime and a serious moral wrong.
Correct, nothing to do with fondness
But sexual abuse means the fondness moves over to the more than just fondness.
to abuse
snip
d***@cox.net
2020-03-16 12:52:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
You;re are kidding aren't you?
Adult sexual contact with an underage minor is a crime and a serious moral
wrong.
Correct
Post by d***@cox.net
Pedophilia, by contrast, is a psychiatric disorder involving primary or
exclusive sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children (not just any person under
the age of 18), which — if acted on — is a crime and a serious moral wrong.
Correct, nothing to do with fondness
But sexual abuse means the fondness moves over to the more than just fondness.
to abuse
Pedophilia is fondness ==> acting sexually is moving to abuse.

Or can't you read?
Post by Dechucka
snip
the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-03-16 19:26:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
You;re are kidding aren't you?
Adult sexual contact with an underage minor is a crime and a serious moral
wrong.
Correct
Post by d***@cox.net
Pedophilia, by contrast, is a psychiatric disorder involving primary or
exclusive sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children (not just any person under
the age of 18), which — if acted on — is a crime and a serious moral wrong.
Correct, nothing to do with fondness
But sexual abuse means the fondness moves over to the more than just fondness.
to abuse
Pedophilia is fondness ==> acting sexually is moving to abuse.
The matter is abuse and the disgusting cover-up of abuse in the RCC
d***@cox.net
2020-03-16 21:29:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
You;re are kidding aren't you?
Adult sexual contact with an underage minor is a crime and a serious moral
wrong.
Correct
Post by d***@cox.net
Pedophilia, by contrast, is a psychiatric disorder involving primary or
exclusive sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children (not just any person under
the age of 18), which — if acted on — is a crime and a serious moral wrong.
Correct, nothing to do with fondness
But sexual abuse means the fondness moves over to the more than just fondness.
to abuse
Pedophilia is fondness ==> acting sexually is moving to abuse.
The matter is abuse and the disgusting cover-up of abuse in the RCC
How can there be a case of abuse if the victim is pre-teen and doesn't come
forward nor does it's parents?

the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-03-16 22:05:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
You;re are kidding aren't you?
Adult sexual contact with an underage minor is a crime and a serious moral
wrong.
Correct
Post by d***@cox.net
Pedophilia, by contrast, is a psychiatric disorder involving primary or
exclusive sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children (not just any person under
the age of 18), which — if acted on — is a crime and a serious moral wrong.
Correct, nothing to do with fondness
But sexual abuse means the fondness moves over to the more than just fondness.
to abuse
Pedophilia is fondness ==> acting sexually is moving to abuse.
The matter is abuse and the disgusting cover-up of abuse in the RCC
How can there be a case of abuse if the victim is pre-teen
What has pre-teen got to do with anything?
Post by d***@cox.net
and doesn't come
forward nor does it's parents?
no complaint to anyone no case because nobody knows it exists. What is
your point?
d***@cox.net
2020-03-17 13:33:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
You;re are kidding aren't you?
Adult sexual contact with an underage minor is a crime and a serious moral
wrong.
Correct
Post by d***@cox.net
Pedophilia, by contrast, is a psychiatric disorder involving primary or
exclusive sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children (not just any person under
the age of 18), which — if acted on — is a crime and a serious moral wrong.
Correct, nothing to do with fondness
But sexual abuse means the fondness moves over to the more than just fondness.
to abuse
Pedophilia is fondness ==> acting sexually is moving to abuse.
The matter is abuse and the disgusting cover-up of abuse in the RCC
How can there be a case of abuse if the victim is pre-teen
What has pre-teen got to do with anything?
Post by d***@cox.net
and doesn't come
forward nor does it's parents?
no complaint to anyone no case because nobody knows it exists. What is
your point?
It's not pedophilia at greater age.
the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-03-17 19:13:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
You;re are kidding aren't you?
Adult sexual contact with an underage minor is a crime and a serious moral
wrong.
Correct
Post by d***@cox.net
Pedophilia, by contrast, is a psychiatric disorder involving primary or
exclusive sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children (not just any person under
the age of 18), which — if acted on — is a crime and a serious moral wrong.
Correct, nothing to do with fondness
But sexual abuse means the fondness moves over to the more than just fondness.
to abuse
Pedophilia is fondness ==> acting sexually is moving to abuse.
The matter is abuse and the disgusting cover-up of abuse in the RCC
How can there be a case of abuse if the victim is pre-teen
What has pre-teen got to do with anything?
Post by d***@cox.net
and doesn't come
forward nor does it's parents?
no complaint to anyone no case because nobody knows it exists. What is
your point?
It's not pedophilia at greater age.
So your point is a total irrelevanciy
d***@cox.net
2020-03-18 14:49:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
You;re are kidding aren't you?
Adult sexual contact with an underage minor is a crime and a serious moral
wrong.
Correct
Post by d***@cox.net
Pedophilia, by contrast, is a psychiatric disorder involving primary or
exclusive sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children (not just any person under
the age of 18), which — if acted on — is a crime and a serious moral wrong.
Correct, nothing to do with fondness
But sexual abuse means the fondness moves over to the more than just fondness.
to abuse
Pedophilia is fondness ==> acting sexually is moving to abuse.
The matter is abuse and the disgusting cover-up of abuse in the RCC
How can there be a case of abuse if the victim is pre-teen
What has pre-teen got to do with anything?
Post by d***@cox.net
and doesn't come
forward nor does it's parents?
no complaint to anyone no case because nobody knows it exists. What is
your point?
It's not pedophilia at greater age.
So your point is a total irrelevanciy
Wow, you really are dense after what I posted.
the dukester, American-American

Mattb
2020-03-13 20:08:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
"Former (FORMER) priest Brian Spillane, 77, had pleaded not guilty
to the historical charge of buggery over the alleged incident with a
10-year-old on Shark Island in 1964. ( 1964 )....
Yes but he was a claimed man of God and able to confess (forgive
sin) and marry people while raping kids.
Fondness, no raping.
Really? Fondness???
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-03-12 19:16:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
"Former (FORMER) priest Brian Spillane, 77, had pleaded not guilty
to the historical charge of buggery over the alleged incident with a
10-year-old on Shark Island in 1964. ( 1964 )....
His trial was due to begin on Monday but the Director of Public
Prosecutions has now withdrawn the charge.
"After careful consideration, the director determined there was no
reasonable prospect of a conviction and directed the charge not
proceed further," a DPP spokeswoman told AAP on Wednesday."
DUHHHHHHHHH.
Over 50 years ago.....
Show the fairness in our system
Patrick B
2020-03-12 20:07:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
"Former (FORMER) priest Brian Spillane, 77, had pleaded not guilty
to the historical charge of buggery over the alleged incident with a
10-year-old on Shark Island in 1964. ( 1964 )....
His trial was due to begin on Monday but the Director of Public
Prosecutions has now withdrawn the charge.
"After careful consideration, the director determined there was no
reasonable prospect of a conviction and directed the charge not
proceed further," a DPP spokeswoman told AAP on Wednesday."
DUHHHHHHHHH.
Over 50 years ago.....
Show the fairness in our system
It was a reach. And finally someone figured it out.
Dechucka
2020-03-12 20:14:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
"Former (FORMER) priest Brian Spillane, 77, had pleaded not guilty
to the historical charge of buggery over the alleged incident with a
10-year-old on Shark Island in 1964. ( 1964 )....
His trial was due to begin on Monday but the Director of Public
Prosecutions has now withdrawn the charge.
"After careful consideration, the director determined there was no
reasonable prospect of a conviction and directed the charge not
proceed further," a DPP spokeswoman told AAP on Wednesday."
DUHHHHHHHHH.
Over 50 years ago.....
Show the fairness in our system
It was a reach. And finally someone figured it out.
Exactly, shows the fairness of our system
Patrick B
2020-03-12 21:48:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
"Former (FORMER) priest Brian Spillane, 77, had pleaded not guilty
to the historical charge of buggery over the alleged incident with a
10-year-old on Shark Island in 1964. ( 1964 )....
His trial was due to begin on Monday but the Director of Public
Prosecutions has now withdrawn the charge.
"After careful consideration, the director determined there was no
reasonable prospect of a conviction and directed the charge not
proceed further," a DPP spokeswoman told AAP on Wednesday."
DUHHHHHHHHH.
Over 50 years ago.....
Show the fairness in our system
It was a reach. And finally someone figured it out.
Exactly, shows the fairness of our system
Saved face.
Dechucka
2020-03-12 21:49:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
"Former (FORMER) priest Brian Spillane, 77, had pleaded not guilty
to the historical charge of buggery over the alleged incident with a
10-year-old on Shark Island in 1964. ( 1964 )....
His trial was due to begin on Monday but the Director of Public
Prosecutions has now withdrawn the charge.
"After careful consideration, the director determined there was no
reasonable prospect of a conviction and directed the charge not
proceed further," a DPP spokeswoman told AAP on Wednesday."
DUHHHHHHHHH.
Over 50 years ago.....
Show the fairness in our system
It was a reach. And finally someone figured it out.
Exactly, shows the fairness of our system
Saved face.
Why?
d***@cox.net
2020-03-13 11:54:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by MattB.
Sex charge against NSW pedo priest dropped
https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/sex-charge-against-nsw-pedo-priest-dropped/news-story/05edb330ef6e8e912833f4cc4f6cdc6f
"Former (FORMER) priest Brian Spillane, 77, had pleaded not guilty
to the historical charge of buggery over the alleged incident with a
10-year-old on Shark Island in 1964. ( 1964 )....
His trial was due to begin on Monday but the Director of Public
Prosecutions has now withdrawn the charge.
"After careful consideration, the director determined there was no
reasonable prospect of a conviction and directed the charge not
proceed further," a DPP spokeswoman told AAP on Wednesday."
DUHHHHHHHHH.
Over 50 years ago.....
Show the fairness in our system
The USA has been clean for 30 years now.
the dukester, American-American
Henry Briggs
2020-03-14 07:39:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
Ned Latham
2020-03-14 07:52:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
The licence to rape, sodomise and abuse.
d***@cox.net
2020-03-14 18:13:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
The licence to rape, sodomise and abuse.
is man's.
the dukester, American-American
Patrick B
2020-03-14 10:59:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
We are trusting, loving, gullible people thinking others are also.
Dechucka
2020-03-14 19:25:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
We are trusting, loving, gullible people
Well you do believe in a sky fairy so the gullibility run deeps
Patrick B
2020-03-14 21:35:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
We are trusting, loving, gullible people
Well you do believe in a sky fairy so the gullibility run deeps
You betcha.
But then, I'm also happy.
Whereas life sucks for you, and then you will die.
And you get all dressed up in a casket with no place to go.
Dechucka
2020-03-14 22:11:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
We are trusting, loving, gullible people
Well you do believe in a sky fairy so the gullibility run deeps
You betcha.
But then, I'm also happy.
So am I
Post by Patrick B
Whereas life sucks for you, and then you will die.
As will you
Post by Patrick B
And you get all dressed up in a casket with no place to go.
I'll end up the same place as you, 6 foot down being eaten by worms.
Ned Latham
2020-03-14 22:32:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
Post by Patrick B
And you get all dressed up in a casket with no place to go.
I'll end up the same place as you, 6 foot down being eaten by worms.
Wrong again, Dopey. You will have ceased to exist; all the worms
get is the dead meat you once lived in.

(Of course, you're not as wrong as that idiot RCC gull.)
Fran
2020-03-14 23:45:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Whereas life sucks for you, and then you will die.
Life must sick for someone else if Paddy insists that it does.

If there was such a thing as a God, it should have given him enough
brains to keep his strawmen out of his posts and save him from being stupid.
Petzl
2020-03-15 00:25:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Fran
Post by Patrick B
Whereas life sucks for you, and then you will die.
Life must sick for someone else if Paddy insists that it does.
If there was such a thing as a God, it should have given him enough
brains to keep his strawmen out of his posts and save him from being stupid.
President invites everyone to his Church tomorrow
https://freechapel.org/live
--
Petzl
What perfect set of circumstances placed our Sun a
Celestial ball of fire at just the correct distance
from our little blue planet for life to evolve?
All simply conicidence?
The very fact we exist is nothing but the result of a
complex yet inevitable string of chemical accidents
and biological mutations?
There is no Grand meaning? There is no purpose?

If gravity was slightly more powerful
the universe would collapse into a bowl!
If gravity was less powerful the universe would fly apart,
there would be no stars no planets!

Gravity is precisely as strong as it needs to be!
If the ratio of the electromagnetic force to the
strong force wasn't 1% life wouldn't exist!
Dechucka
2020-03-15 00:45:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Fran
Post by Patrick B
Whereas life sucks for you, and then you will die.
Life must sick for someone else if Paddy insists that it does.
If there was such a thing as a God, it should have given him enough
brains to keep his strawmen out of his posts and save him from being stupid.
President invites everyone to his Church tomorrow
https://freechapel.org/live
Hope they all don't get covid-19 as they pray for deliverance from
plague upon them.
Wonder if it is like this "Bethel Church suspends faith healing work at
hospitals amid corona virus outbreak"

https://www.christianpost.com/news/bethel-church-suspends-faith-healing-work-at-hospitals-amid-coronavirus-outbreak.html
LinuxGal
2020-03-15 19:36:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Dechucka
Well you do believe in a sky fairy so the gullibility run deeps
You betcha.
But then, I'm also happy.
Whereas life sucks for you, and then you will die.
And you get all dressed up in a casket with no place to go.
From the film "Enemy Mine":

"We entrust our brother to God's merciful keeping, and we
commit his body to space. From ashes to ashes, from dust to
dust..."

"Jesus Christ! Didn't they just fix that thing?"

"Shit. Who's listening, anyway? Next."

"Gavorki, George W. Agnostic."

"No music."

"So long."

"Next.
--
I have spoken.

https://twitter.com/LinuxGal
Mattb
2020-03-14 17:31:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
Look at Patrick and Duke and how far they will go to defend the
pedophilia. If that is the attitude of RCC leadership which seems to
have been the case for decades if not centuries they made the perfect
environment. There are reported cases in the 1800s. Maybe the Pope
that made celibacy a requirement was a pedophile and hated women.
d***@cox.net
2020-03-14 18:14:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
Look at Patrick and Duke and how far they will go to defend the
pedophilia.
You hate the truth, don't you, redman with a black heart.

the dukester, American-American
Mattb
2020-03-14 19:26:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
Look at Patrick and Duke and how far they will go to defend the
pedophilia.
You hate the truth, don't you, redman with a black heart.
I like truth my truth just doesn't change depending on if it is
about the RCC. Yours does.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
d***@cox.net
2020-03-15 14:14:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
Look at Patrick and Duke and how far they will go to defend the
pedophilia.
You hate the truth, don't you, redman with a black heart.
I like truth my truth just doesn't change depending on if it is
about the RCC. Yours does.
That's nothing but a lie. Lock your shit filled box.
the dukester, American-American
Mattb
2020-03-15 18:43:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
Look at Patrick and Duke and how far they will go to defend the
pedophilia.
You hate the truth, don't you, redman with a black heart.
I like truth my truth just doesn't change depending on if it is
about the RCC. Yours does.
That's nothing but a lie.
I believe most everyone here know your truth changes depending if it
is about Catholics or not. The only person here like you I know of is
Patshit. Then he is Patshit crazy.
Post by d***@cox.net
Lock your shit filled box.
You hate the box and the requirement you keep it to insulting me and
not people outside the Box.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
d***@cox.net
2020-03-16 12:53:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
Look at Patrick and Duke and how far they will go to defend the
pedophilia.
You hate the truth, don't you, redman with a black heart.
I like truth my truth just doesn't change depending on if it is
about the RCC. Yours does.
That's nothing but a lie.
I believe most everyone here know your truth changes depending if it
is about Catholics or not.
You've never been known for telling the truth.
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Lock your shit filled box.
You hate the box and the requirement you keep it to insulting me and
not people outside the Box.
Your box stinks.
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
the dukester, American-American
Mattb
2020-03-16 17:00:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
Look at Patrick and Duke and how far they will go to defend the
pedophilia.
You hate the truth, don't you, redman with a black heart.
I like truth my truth just doesn't change depending on if it is
about the RCC. Yours does.
That's nothing but a lie.
I believe most everyone here know your truth changes depending if it
is about Catholics or not.
You've never been known for telling the truth.
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Lock your shit filled box.
You hate the box and the requirement you keep it to insulting me and
not people outside the Box.
Your box stinks.
Yes it would be nice if it wasn't necessary with those that use
calumny, with disinformation, and evil in defense of pedophilia, the
cover up and the false doctrines and traditions of the RCC it is. Yet
in reality ad hominem is the best debating tool you have as truth
isn't able to defend those acts and beliefs.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
the dukester, American-American
d***@cox.net
2020-03-16 21:31:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Mattb
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
Look at Patrick and Duke and how far they will go to defend the
pedophilia.
You hate the truth, don't you, redman with a black heart.
I like truth my truth just doesn't change depending on if it is
about the RCC. Yours does.
That's nothing but a lie.
I believe most everyone here know your truth changes depending if it
is about Catholics or not.
You've never been known for telling the truth.
Post by Mattb
Post by d***@cox.net
Lock your shit filled box.
You hate the box and the requirement you keep it to insulting me and
not people outside the Box.
Your box stinks.
Yes it would be nice if it wasn't necessary with those that use
calumny, with disinformation, and evil in defense of pedophilia, the
cover up and the false doctrines and traditions of the RCC it is. Yet
in reality ad hominem is the best debating tool you have as truth
isn't able to defend those acts and beliefs.
I don't have to debate. You're full of bullshit with nothing to say but
bullshit. I'm smarter than that.
the dukester, American-American
d***@cox.net
2020-03-14 18:12:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
The great news is that the studies have revealed that the pedo issue is NO
GREATER in the priesthood than any other part of life - police, prot ministers,
teachers, doctors, rabbis, summer camp supervisors, etc, etc, etc.

Now you know the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-03-14 19:28:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
The great news is that the studies have revealed that the pedo issue is NO
GREATER in the priesthood than any other part of life - police, prot ministers,
teachers, doctors, rabbis, summer camp supervisors, etc, etc, etc.
The problem in the RCC and the other organizations mention in our Royal
Commission and others around the world is not that there was child abuse
per se but the reaction by the organizations about abusers they knew about
d***@cox.net
2020-03-15 14:24:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
The great news is that the studies have revealed that the pedo issue is NO
GREATER in the priesthood than any other part of life - police, prot ministers,
teachers, doctors, rabbis, summer camp supervisors, etc, etc, etc.
The problem in the RCC and the other organizations mention in our Royal
Commission and others around the world is not that there was child abuse
per se but the reaction by the organizations about abusers they knew about
OK, now we have something to discuss.

Does "knowing about" mandate a criminal act having taken place. If there is no
evidence except hearsay, no other evidence, no witnesses, no bloody bottoms,
what does a bishop do where there is no "evident crime"? .

You know as well as I do that the police can't move on "a best guess, by
golly".

Where are the parent complaints? At best, they can complain, but can't show.
What do the legal authorities do and go by?

How then does the Bishop find out?

Two ways? In the confessional but that's private. In the employee review? In
any case, the priest has to come forward and admit what he did.

Now possibly you can offer the next legal step.
the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-03-15 19:14:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
The great news is that the studies have revealed that the pedo issue is NO
GREATER in the priesthood than any other part of life - police, prot ministers,
teachers, doctors, rabbis, summer camp supervisors, etc, etc, etc.
The problem in the RCC and the other organizations mention in our Royal
Commission and others around the world is not that there was child abuse
per se but the reaction by the organizations about abusers they knew about
OK, now we have something to discuss.
Does "knowing about" mandate a criminal act having taken place.
No

If there is no
Post by d***@cox.net
evidence except hearsay, no other evidence, no witnesses, no bloody bottoms,
what does a bishop do where there is no "evident crime"? .
Report of the victim is evidence
Post by d***@cox.net
You know as well as I do that the police can't move on "a best guess, by
golly".
Where are the parent complaints? At best, they can complain, but can't show.
What do the legal authorities do and go by?
The complaint, if no evidence the complaint is dropped
Post by d***@cox.net
How then does the Bishop find out?
They knew as the reports have shown'
Post by d***@cox.net
Two ways? In the confessional but that's private. In the employee review? In
any case, the priest has to come forward and admit what he did.
Nope, see all the ones in gaol who pleaded not guilty
Post by d***@cox.net
Now possibly you can offer the next legal step.
Legal steps are clear, were in the past which is why the cover-uo by the
RCC and others was wrong
d***@cox.net
2020-03-16 12:58:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
The great news is that the studies have revealed that the pedo issue is NO
GREATER in the priesthood than any other part of life - police, prot ministers,
teachers, doctors, rabbis, summer camp supervisors, etc, etc, etc.
The problem in the RCC and the other organizations mention in our Royal
Commission and others around the world is not that there was child abuse
per se but the reaction by the organizations about abusers they knew about
OK, now we have something to discuss.
Does "knowing about" mandate a criminal act having taken place.
No
Correct.
Post by d***@cox.net
If there is no
Post by d***@cox.net
evidence except hearsay, no other evidence, no witnesses, no bloody bottoms,
what does a bishop do where there is no "evident crime"? .
Report of the victim is evidence
No, they are all 12 years old and under.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
You know as well as I do that the police can't move on "a best guess, by
golly".
Where are the parent complaints? At best, they can complain, but can't show.
What do the legal authorities do and go by?
The complaint, if no evidence the complaint is dropped
Unless the abuser comes forward in guilt, the victin is under 13.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
How then does the Bishop find out?
They knew as the reports have shown'
How do they find out. It's either the child accusing, the confessional which is
private by law, or the perp's guiltyness.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Two ways? In the confessional but that's private. In the employee review? In
any case, the priest has to come forward and admit what he did.
Nope, see all the ones in gaol who pleaded not guilty
Sounds like some false arrests.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Now possibly you can offer the next legal step.
Legal steps are clear, were in the past which is why the cover-uo by the
RCC and others was wrong
Wrong, yes, but who is guilty? Not the RCC, which is an organization, not a
person.
the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-03-16 19:30:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
The great news is that the studies have revealed that the pedo issue is NO
GREATER in the priesthood than any other part of life - police, prot ministers,
teachers, doctors, rabbis, summer camp supervisors, etc, etc, etc.
The problem in the RCC and the other organizations mention in our Royal
Commission and others around the world is not that there was child abuse
per se but the reaction by the organizations about abusers they knew about
OK, now we have something to discuss.
Does "knowing about" mandate a criminal act having taken place.
No
Correct.
Of course
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
If there is no
Post by d***@cox.net
evidence except hearsay, no other evidence, no witnesses, no bloody bottoms,
what does a bishop do where there is no "evident crime"? .
Report of the victim is evidence
No, they are all 12 years old and under.
1) they aren't
2) so what?
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
You know as well as I do that the police can't move on "a best guess, by
golly".
Where are the parent complaints? At best, they can complain, but can't show.
What do the legal authorities do and go by?
The complaint, if no evidence the complaint is dropped
Unless the abuser comes forward in guilt, the victin is under 13.
Under 13 now, what has that to do with anything?
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
How then does the Bishop find out?
They knew as the reports have shown'
How do they find out. It's either the child accusing, the confessional which is
private by law, or the perp's guiltyness.
They way that all those priest and other in the RCC are in the slammer,
obviously
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Two ways? In the confessional but that's private. In the employee review? In
any case, the priest has to come forward and admit what he did.
Nope, see all the ones in gaol who pleaded not guilty
Sounds like some false arrests.
Some?
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Now possibly you can offer the next legal step.
Legal steps are clear, were in the past which is why the cover-uo by the
RCC and others was wrong
Wrong, yes, but who is guilty? Not the RCC, which is an organization, not a
person.
The RCC is guilty because it is made up of men and allowed this to happen.
d***@cox.net
2020-03-16 21:50:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
The great news is that the studies have revealed that the pedo issue is NO
GREATER in the priesthood than any other part of life - police, prot ministers,
teachers, doctors, rabbis, summer camp supervisors, etc, etc, etc.
The problem in the RCC and the other organizations mention in our Royal
Commission and others around the world is not that there was child abuse
per se but the reaction by the organizations about abusers they knew about
OK, now we have something to discuss.
Does "knowing about" mandate a criminal act having taken place.
No
Correct.
Of course
That settles that.
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
If there is no
Post by d***@cox.net
evidence except hearsay, no other evidence, no witnesses, no bloody bottoms,
what does a bishop do where there is no "evident crime"? .
Report of the victim is evidence
No, they are all 12 years old and under.
1) they aren't
2) so what?
Yes they are. That is what pedophilia constitutes. Affection for pre teens.
And it becomes sexual abuse then it involves touching sexually, kissing, and
worse..
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
You know as well as I do that the police can't move on "a best guess, by
golly".
Where are the parent complaints? At best, they can complain, but can't show.
What do the legal authorities do and go by?
The complaint, if no evidence the complaint is dropped
Then no pedophile to turn in.
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Unless the abuser comes forward in guilt, the victin is under 13.
Under 13 now, what has that to do with anything?
Pedophilia is pre teen. The vast majority of the clerical sex-abuse scandals
now coming to light do not involve pedophilia. Rather, they involve ephebophilia
— homosexual attraction to adolescent boys.
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
How then does the Bishop find out?
They knew as the reports have shown'
How do they find out. It's either the child accusing, the confessional which is
private by law, or the perp's guiltyness.
They way that all those priest and other in the RCC are in the slammer,
obviously
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Two ways? In the confessional but that's private. In the employee review? In
any case, the priest has to come forward and admit what he did.
Nope, see all the ones in gaol who pleaded not guilty
Sounds like some false arrests.
Some?
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Now possibly you can offer the next legal step.
Legal steps are clear, were in the past which is why the cover-uo by the
RCC and others was wrong
Wrong, yes, but who is guilty? Not the RCC, which is an organization, not a
person.
The RCC is guilty because it is made up of men and allowed this to happen.
That's the huge falsehood: They 'ALLOWED' it to happen?. No they didn't ALLOW
it to happen. But it happened. No witnesses, no evidence, pre teens. It
stopped in the US by the 1990's. Don't aussies know now? Is it still happening
in your country?
the dukester, American-American
Dechucka
2020-03-16 22:01:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Does "knowing about" mandate a criminal act having taken place.
No
Correct.
Of course
That settles that.
Always has been but you keep arguing
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
If there is no
Post by d***@cox.net
evidence except hearsay, no other evidence, no witnesses, no bloody bottoms,
what does a bishop do where there is no "evident crime"? .
Report of the victim is evidence
No, they are all 12 years old and under.
1) they aren't
2) so what?
Yes they are. That is what pedophilia constitutes. Affection for pre teens.
And it becomes sexual abuse then it involves touching sexually, kissing, and
worse..
We are discussing child abuse, what difference in reporting does it make
if the kids is 12 or under?
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
You know as well as I do that the police can't move on "a best guess, by
golly".
Where are the parent complaints? At best, they can complain, but can't show.
What do the legal authorities do and go by?
The complaint, if no evidence the complaint is dropped
Then no pedophile to turn in.
They are turned in first than investigated
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Unless the abuser comes forward in guilt, the victin is under 13.
Under 13 now, what has that to do with anything?
Pedophilia is pre teen. The vast majority of the clerical sex-abuse scandals
now coming to light do not involve pedophilia. Rather, they involve ephebophilia
— homosexual attraction to adolescent boys.
So what it is still criminal as is the RCC reaction to it
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
How then does the Bishop find out?
They knew as the reports have shown'
How do they find out. It's either the child accusing, the confessional which is
private by law, or the perp's guiltyness.
They way that all those priest and other in the RCC are in the slammer,
obviously
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Two ways? In the confessional but that's private. In the employee review? In
any case, the priest has to come forward and admit what he did.
Nope, see all the ones in gaol who pleaded not guilty
Sounds like some false arrests.
Some?
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Now possibly you can offer the next legal step.
Legal steps are clear, were in the past which is why the cover-uo by the
RCC and others was wrong
Wrong, yes, but who is guilty? Not the RCC, which is an organization, not a
person.
The RCC is guilty because it is made up of men and allowed this to happen.
That's the huge falsehood: They 'ALLOWED' it to happen?. No they didn't ALLOW
it to happen. But it happened.
And the allowed it to continue by moving them to abuse again.
Post by d***@cox.net
No witnesses,
What about the victims
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Ned Latham
no evidence,
What about the victim's evidence
Post by d***@cox.net
pre teens.
among others but of course pre-teens or not they can give evidence
Post by d***@cox.net
It
stopped in the US by the 1990's.
Bullshit
Post by d***@cox.net
Don't aussies know now? Is it still happening
in your country?
I'm sure it is as in the US and other countries but hopefully now the
RCC is reacting legally and morally by reporting these perverts to the
civil authorities instead of covering it up as they did previously.
d***@cox.net
2020-03-17 14:07:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Does "knowing about" mandate a criminal act having taken place.
No
Correct.
Of course
That settles that.
Always has been but you keep arguing
No, never "always has been". You clearly are void of much truth that others of
us know.
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
If there is no
Post by d***@cox.net
evidence except hearsay, no other evidence, no witnesses, no bloody bottoms,
what does a bishop do where there is no "evident crime"? .
Report of the victim is evidence
No, they are all 12 years old and under.
1) they aren't
Preteen is a mandate for pedophilia. Ephebophilia is the primary sexual interest
in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19.[
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Ned Latham
2) so what?
Yes they are. That is what pedophilia constitutes. Affection for pre teens.
And it becomes sexual abuse then it involves touching sexually, kissing, and
worse..
We are discussing child abuse, what difference in reporting does it make
if the kids is 12 or under?
Consider the following: many people with pedophilia (1) hate their desires, (2)
do not act on them for moral reasons (and should therefore plausibly be praised
rather than vilified), and yet (3) often do not seek treatment precisely because
they are aware that people in general cannot seem to tell the difference
between:

(a) feeling involuntarily sexually attracted to young children (not wrong in and
of itself), and
(b) molesting or sexually assaulting children (very wrong in and of itself, no
matter the reason).
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
You know as well as I do that the police can't move on "a best guess, by
golly".
Where are the parent complaints? At best, they can complain, but can't show.
What do the legal authorities do and go by?
The complaint, if no evidence the complaint is dropped
Then no pedophile to turn in.
They are turned in first than investigated
Does that include "I think he might be a pedo"?
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Unless the abuser comes forward in guilt, the victin is under 13.
Under 13 now, what has that to do with anything?
Pedophilia is pre teen. The vast majority of the clerical sex-abuse scandals
now coming to light do not involve pedophilia. Rather, they involve ephebophilia
— homosexual attraction to adolescent boys.
So what it is still criminal as is the RCC reaction to it
Not in my country. We stopped it last century.
Post by Dechucka
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Ned Latham
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
How then does the Bishop find out?
They knew as the reports have shown'
How do they find out. It's either the child accusing, the confessional which is
private by law, or the perp's guiltyness.
They way that all those priest and other in the RCC are in the slammer,
obviously
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Two ways? In the confessional but that's private. In the employee review? In
any case, the priest has to come forward and admit what he did.
Nope, see all the ones in gaol who pleaded not guilty
Sounds like some false arrests.
Some?
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by d***@cox.net
Now possibly you can offer the next legal step.
Legal steps are clear, were in the past which is why the cover-uo by the
RCC and others was wrong
Wrong, yes, but who is guilty? Not the RCC, which is an organization, not a
person.
The RCC is guilty because it is made up of men and allowed this to happen.
That's the huge falsehood: They 'ALLOWED' it to happen?. No they didn't ALLOW
it to happen. But it happened.
And the allowed it to continue by moving them to abuse again.
Post by d***@cox.net
No witnesses,
What about the victims
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Ned Latham
no evidence,
What about the victim's evidence
Post by d***@cox.net
pre teens.
among others but of course pre-teens or not they can give evidence
Post by d***@cox.net
It
stopped in the US by the 1990's.
Bullshit
Post by d***@cox.net
Don't aussies know now? Is it still happening
in your country?
I'm sure it is as in the US and other countries but hopefully now the
RCC is reacting legally and morally by reporting these perverts to the
civil authorities instead of covering it up as they did previously.
the dukester, American-American
tesla sTinker
2020-03-14 22:36:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Catholic does not mean nothing but universal.
No, it does not mean a religion. This is the lies of the world.
Sick they are, because, they do not honor what the meaning of the word
is. So they believe in lies yes. and that, its a religion.

They think it makes them more holy to go along with the lies.
To me, its very sick of them, and I, am a catholic. But at least i do
not side with them in what they believe. Their belief of the Bible and
the lies they have been told, is not the same belief in what God had
told them to believe.

So, that means, its all a false perception the whole thing.
Post by Henry Briggs
Post by MattB.
Described as a charismatic and well-regarded priest and college
chaplain,
What is it with the Catholic religion that attracts these scumbags?
d***@cox.net
2020-03-15 14:32:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 15:36:02 -0700, tesla sTinker
Post by tesla sTinker
Catholic does not mean nothing but universal.
No, it does not mean a religion. This is the lies of the world.
Sick they are, because, they do not honor what the meaning of the word
is. So they believe in lies yes. and that, its a religion.
But it is a religion and the one founded by Jesus Christ. You faith is just a
fake with no basis from Jesus Christ.
Post by tesla sTinker
They think it makes them more holy to go along with the lies.
More holy by lying??? Haahaahaa. You're a nut case.
Post by tesla sTinker
To me, its very sick of them, and I, am a catholic.
No, you aren't. You're a fake.
Post by tesla sTinker
But at least i do
not side with them in what they believe. Their belief of the Bible and
the lies they have been told, is not the same belief in what God had
told them to believe.
Ass. Open your bible and pick something you believe. Then show where same is
not found in the RCC.
the dukester, American-American
Loading...