Susan Cohen
2023-02-25 21:07:55 UTC
By Austin J. App
I am highly gratified -- and I am sure all the other speakers are too
-- that the Institute for Historical Review had the inspiration and
the courage to organize this 1979 Revisionist Convention. It is badly
needed and long overdue.
Every major war is conducted on tidal waves of propaganda, fair and
foul. World War II, because it involved almost the whole world, and
because the victors insisted on Unconditional Surrender, and because
their side included the two most vengeful and vindictive ideologies in
the world, Bolshevism and Zionism, also was guilty of the most
shameless and unscrupulous propaganda so far on record. In part
because of the never-forget -- never-forgive mentality, World War II
Allied atrocity propaganda has not ebbed down but kept in high tide,
as with the recent phony documentary the NBC-TV Holocaust.
Therefore Historical Revisionism is more important than after any
other war: the more atrocity -- and hate-mongering vitiate the terms
of peace, as at Yalta and Potsdam, the more Revisionism is needed to
heal the wounds. The Institute for Historical Review does a vital
service both to historical scholarship and also to basic values.
Since 1946, when mostly from small back-page items in brave little
publications, I soon was sickened by mountains of evidence of the
bestialities of the victors, especially the Soviet-Russians. In anger
I published Ravishing the Women of Conquered Europe. The subtitle was:
"The Big Three Liberators at Work Having a Wonderful Time Raping and
Debauching the Women of Germany, Austria and Hungary; Re-Educating
Them to Become Good Christians." I followed this with History's Most
Terrifying Peace. I got thousands and thousands of grateful letters.
But I also discovered what hatred and recriminations historical truth
provokes among the vindictive vipers in public affairs and in the
press!
For me it feels good after thirteen years to see California again. In
June 1966 I spoke at the San Diego Mann Jr. High School on "Police
Brutality a Phony Cry." But even farther back, in 1923-24 I spent a
year in San Francisco, which climaxed with my taking a national
scholarship examination (at St. Mary's College). What I won was a
Knights of Columbus four-year full Fellowship to the Catholic
University of America, in D.C., a milestone in my career. Being here
today unrolls the kaleidoscope of a lifetime before me.
It was a lifetime during which I was ever painfully conscious of the
ugly lies about the world wars, which sabotaged the ideals expressed
in the Fourteen Points and the Atlantic Charter. I am sorry to
conclude that American foreign policy has never been consistently wise
or fair; and, if anything, it is even now getting worse rather than
better. General Douglas MacArthur in 1952 (U.S. News, 18 July1952)
said:
"Foreign policy has been as tragically in error as has domestic
policy. We practically invited Soviet dominion over the free peoples
of Eastern Europe ... permitting the advance of the Soviet forces to
the West to plant the red flag of Communism on the ramparts of Berlin,
Vienna and Prague, capitals of Western civilization."
In a similar vein former President Herbert Hoover said,
"The souls of one quarter of mankind have been seared by the violation
of that American promise [namely, Wilson's Fourteen Points and
Roosevelt's Atlantic Charter]. The ghosts of the Four Freedoms and the
Atlantic Charter now wander amid the clanking chains of a thousand
slave camps." (U.S. News, 18 July 1952)
The tragic fact is that America, far from having made the world safe
for democracy and self-determination, got into and won the war by
spreading so much hatred and atrocity propaganda about the Germans
that at the end the leaders and the people wanted, not justice, but
vengeance and reparations. They wanted kangaroo war crimes trials for
the losers. In place of self-determination, the victors dismembered
Germany and Austria, tore provinces away and totally robbed and
expelled the inhabitants -- twelve million of them -- shipped her
factories to Soviet Russia, instituted ex post facto laws and trials
to hang Germans. While having from the beginning declared Allied war
criminals, including Jews, untouchable, the Israelis and Bolsheviks
have bludgeoned West Germany to keep persecuting so-called Nazis even
to the present day. This June for the third time, under the leadership
of Simon Wiesenthal, and in disregard of the democratic rights of the
German people, the Bonn Parliament revoked for another spell of years
the Statute of Limitations.
Recently President Carter said that American "causes were always
just." William F. Buckley (Star, 19 July 1979) commented that,
"There was very little justice in the Mexican war, in the
Spanish-American war, or in the seizure of Vera Cruz. ... our
intervention in Vietnam, rather than our failure to consummate our
mission there, was the unjust thing."
The unhappy mission of Revisionists will have to be to show that we
got unjustly into both world wars against Germany, and, to our
everlasting shame and sorrow, did probably more harm than any nation
ever did before -- in that the U.S., and only the U.S., had the means
to lend-lease Soviet-Russia into Berlin -- into the heart of Western
Europe.
Anglo-American propaganda has managed to represent the Entente or the
Allies as the "good guys" and the Germans and the Axis as the "bad
guys." This is to fool the people and foul up the peace. The intrinsic
reason America intervened in European wars to destroy Germany was not
ethics but power politics. When America saw that Germany was clearly
the strongest nation in Europe, the U.S. began to side with the second
-- strongest there, Britain.
But the American people preferred neutrality. Therefore they had to be
exposed to horrendous atrocity propaganda, such as that the Kaiser
wanted to rule the world, that Germans cut the hands off Belgian
babies, that submarine warfare made all Germans criminals. Even so, a
third factor had to be mobilized to grease America's entry into World
War I. That factor was the Balfour Declaration.
Jews had for centuries been best treated by Germany and Austria and
felt most congenial there, even to adopting Yiddish as their language.
Consequently for the first two years of World War I American Jews were
sympathetic to the Central Powers, and certainly against Czarist
Russia. The British War Cabinet, in the face of German victories,
decided to change the "very pro -- German tendency among the wealthy
American Jewish bankers and bond issuing houses" (See Conrad Grieb,
The Balfour Declaration, N.Y., 1972, p. 3). The Zionist quid pro quo
was for Britain to establish "a national home for the Jewish people in
Palestine" and the Zionists to get America into the war on the side of
Britain. The Balfour Declaration followed, dated 2 November 1917.
Perverting the American Jews from neutrality to intervention against
the Central Powers had been pushed for a year or more -- with success.
What helped to make moralistic Wilson a rabid interventionist was the
illicit affair he had had with a colleague's wife, Mrs. Peck
(remarried, Mrs. Hulburt). Her stepson needed $40,000 to keep him out
of jail. The stepmother asked President Wilson for the money, in
exchange for which she would return to him the packet of love letters
he had written her. When Wilson could not pay this amount, Samuel
Untermeyer rushed to the rescue: If President Wilson would appoint a
Jew to the next vacancy on the Supreme Court, Untermeyer would settle
Mrs. Peck's claim. Thus it happened that America was "blessed" with
its first Jew on the Supreme Bench, and the interventionists on 18
January 1916 got a radical Zionist in a prestige position to help get
America into World War 1.
On 2 April 1917, using as a pretext the sinking of the Sussex (which
in fact had not been sunk), Wilson asked Congress on 2 April 1917, for
a declaration of war against Germany. Dr. E.J. Dillon, in his The
Inside Story of the Peace Conference, wrote, "Henceforth the world
will be governed by the Anglo-Saxon peoples, who in turn are swayed by
their Jewish elements" (See Grieb. op. cit., p.7).
The Balfour Declaration sowed discord between the Germanic and the
Jewish people, which in very fact led to World War II; to a
Morgenthauistic and Bolshevik conclusion; to the expulsion by the
Zionists of the Palestinians; and the sort of continuing friction
which could bring about the Third World War. In this, all symptoms
point to American's being again involved, not on the side of justice
and the Palestinians, but as in World War II on the side of the Jews.
If Soviet Russia were then to help the Arabs, the lines for it would
be drawn -- with America once again, as in World War II, crusading on
the wrong side.
During the Weimar Republic German Jews did not talk or act like
patriotic Germans. They were nihilisic, they denigrated the Wehrmacht;
Walter Mehring called the Stahlhelm dirt (Dreck), Kurt Tucholsky
called German volunteers of 1914 victims of mass drunkenness, Arnold
Zweig called the German people a nation of murderers and vote cattle.
On my first visit to Germany in 1931 I was shocked by this Jewish
pejorativeness. When during the Vietnam war I read the American press,
the Washington Post and New York Times and most of the rest, I
recalled the similarity.
When Hitler became Chancellor his Third Reich government was the
victim of every possible worldwide resistance and smear. It was an
indiscriminate opposition on the part of world Jewry, not only where
Hitler was or might have been wrong, but also where he was obviously
right, as when he demanded the self -- determination for Austria, the
Sudetenland, and Danzig which the victors in 1919 had denied. As early
as 1933, before Hitler had harmed a single Jew, an International
Jewish Boycott Conference, presided over by Samuel Untermeyer, the
same who had paid Wilson $40,000 to appoint Brandeis Supreme Court
justice in 1916, declared a crippling boycott on the Third Reich,
while it was still in the throes of the inhuman reparations imposed at
Versailles.
The boycott included not only the United States but some eight or more
other countries. Simultaneously the anti -- German propaganda of World
War I was revived. And be it noted the International Jewish Boycott
did not exempt the Jews of Germany from this hostile action. Nor did
it keep it merely a Jewish action, but succeeded in pressuring the
United States to cooperate with it: it imposed a general tariff
against German goods as against the "most favored" status for all
other nations, while International Financial interests tried to "call"
sufficient German treasury notes to "break" Germany (see John Beaty,
The Iron Curtain Over America, 1951, p. 63). The fact is that U.S.
foreign policy from 1933 on was directed more to further Zionist
interests rather than those of the U.S. or of the American people.
At Versailles the peace dictators had violated the right of self --
determination of Austria, of the Sudeten Germans, and of the Corridor
and Danzig. Germany had the right and the duty to champion this right
for these people. Hitler did this, and was on the point of settling
for a road through the Corridor and the return of Danzig, an ancient
German city of 400,000.
What honest historians call the Unnecessary War broke out over this
last injustice of Versailles, the worst and most costly war in
history. Why did Poland refuse to negotiate? Because Britain
guaranteed to go to war for Poland. Why did Britain give this foolish
and tragic promise? Ambassador Joseph Kennedy, as related in the
Forrestal Diaries, 27 Dec. 1945, reveals that the war broke out over
Roosevelt's catering to Zionist interests, not to America's, nor even
Britain's. We read:
"Neither the French nor the British would have made Poland a cause of
war if it had not been for the constant needling from Washington ...
Chamberlain, he says, stated that America and the world Jews had
forced England into war."
Even worse, though the American people overwhelmingly wanted us to
avoid the stupidity of intervention against Germany as in World War I,
the same forces, Roosevelt and the Zionists, used every strategy to
involve us. The insults and calumnies Zionist publicists hurled at
Hitler, while the U.S. was still neutral, and before anyone had
invented the atrocity story of the six million Jews "gassed", might
have provoked any sovereign nation to hit back. Dr. Harry Elmer Barnes
wrote that there is
"No greater paradox in history than a war in behalf of Poland on the
basis of the Jewish issue. There were in Poland, in 1933, six times as
many Jews as in Germany, and they were surely treated as badly as were
German Jews under Hitler." (See Blasting the Historical Blackout,
p.35)
Nevertheless, before there was any mention of a so -- called
"Holocaust," and while America was still neutral, American Zionists,
with the approval of the media, produced the most mass genocidic book
in history: Theodore N. Kaufman in Germany Must Perish (Argyle Press,
Newark, 1941) literally urged the sterilization of 48,000,000 German
men and women of childbearing age, so that, he explained, Germanism
will be extirpated in two generations.
Once, as Clare Booth Luce said, Roosevelt had lied America into the
war by the back door -- by provoking the Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbor -- the same Rooseveltians and Zionists immediately started not
only to propagandize for Unconditional Victory but for destroying
Germany forever. The propaganda thrust was not for achieving a durable
peace soon, but for permanent Unconditional Hatred. Among the most
bestial peace plans in history ranks that of the Secretary of the
Treasury, Henry Morgenthau Jr., assisted by a parcel of Zionists,
chief of whom was Harry Dexter White, later exposed as a Communist
spy. Morgenthau without a blush of shame for his monumental atrocity
wrote Germany Is Our Problem (Harper, NY, 1945). It describes the
Morgenthau Plan for the pastoralization of Germany which Morgenthau
presented to Roosevelt and Churchill at the Quebec Conference in 1944.
Germany was to lose most of its territory, all of its manufacturing
facilities, and live by farming but without machinery. The mines of
the Ruhr were to be destroyed, its five million Germans deported --
Morgenthau said he did not care how they would be taken care of. Even
harsh peace advocates like Cordell Hull and H.L. Stimson had enough
humanity left in them to be appalled. They protested that the plan
would starve thirty million Germans to death. Yet Roosevelt and
Churchill, who had so piously proclaimed the Atlantic Charter,
approved this most murderous peace plan in history. During the last
year of the war, with victory visible, Jewish publicists demanded a
Morgenthau peace, did not urge what was 'good for Europe and America',
but what ministered to the vindictiveness and eye -- for -- an --
eyism of Zionists. Richard M. Bruckner wrote Is Germany Incurable?
(Philadelphia, 1943); Dr. L.M. Birk, head, Director of Friends of
Democracy, demanded that "Germany should be removed from the map;" and
Louis Nizer in What to Do with Germany, published in 1944, urged that
"150,000 German leaders should be tried and sentenced up to life." In
the meanwhile Stalin's Jewish propaganda minister, Ilya Ehrenburg,
inflamed the Bolshevik invaders of Germany to
"Kill. In Germany, nothing is guiltless. Neither the living nor the
yet unborn ... Ravish them (the German women) as booty. Kill, you
gallant Red soldiers."
When Jewish publicists urged vengeance on the Germans, they served the
vindictiveness of the Zionists and the barbarous expansionism of
Soviet Russia, not the good of the West Europeans and Americans. Even
Stalin, when peace was in sight, restrained Ehrenburg's hate
propaganda as a hindrance to making peace.
In past wars, when the enemy surrendered, the atrocity propaganda
ebbed off. But after World War II this propaganda intensified after
Unconditional Surrender. We ask why. For whose benefit? A few days
after Surrender, Prof. Friedrich Grimm was interviewed by (who unknown
to him) was Sefton Delmer, the British War Propaganda Chief, who
boasted, "I am of the Central Office you talked about: Atrocity
propaganda -- and with it we won the total victory." When Dr. Grimm
said, "I know, and now you must stop it!" Sefton Delmer retorted:
"No, now we shall start all the more! We shall continue this atrocity
propaganda, we shall intensify it, until nobody shall accept a good
word from Germans anymore, until all the sympathy you had in other
countries shall be destroyed, and until the Germans themselves shall
be so confused that they do not know anymore what they are doing!"
(Quoted from Udo Walendy's The Methods of Reeducation, p. 8)
Here is revealed the strategy of infamy of the selfproclaimed
crusaders for world peace and brotherhood. The deluge of atrocity
propaganda against Germany during and after the war triggered
history's most terrifying peace, and left a legacy of injustices which
the U.S. is morally bound to try to correct. The worst of these is the
monumental expulsion of fourteen million Oder -- Neisse and Sudeten
Germans, killing nearly three million of them, raping many of their
women, and now letting Soviet Russia, and Poland, and Czechoslovakia
claim those ancient German lands.
Worse psychologically, and unique in history, is the reeducation and
the monstrously clever creation of a German government that toadies to
intemational, Zionistic interests. Harry Elmer Barnes, commenting on
Prof. Hoggan's visit to West Germany in April -- May, 1964, and his
hasty reception by Bonn and the media, wrote,
"The German situation in 1964 is a case of fantastic political
masochism without parallel in human history. I know of no other
instance in history where a people have almost frantically sought to
cast the dark shadow of guilt upon themselves for a public crime they
did not commit -- exclusive responsibility for the second world war.
... in 1964, those who sought the truth about 1939 were being vilified
and even exposed to prosecution as public criminals by the Bonn
Government."
(Unpublished manuscript, Malibu, Calif. 1 July 1964)
What has limited true German autonomy; what has kept Washington and
London from agitating to get the Wall out of Berlin and the Iron
Curtain out of Central Europe; what has kept Washington from ever
alluding to the human rights of the seventeen million Germans of the
German Democratic Republic; what has, if you will, kept Washington
from insisting that Rudolf Hess be freed from Spandau before another
bushel of wheat be sold to Soviet Russia, is in the final analysis the
Zionist and Communist agitation about the Third Reich's alleged
extermination of Jews.
The simple truth is that U.S. Foreign Policy has since Roosevelt's
Lend -- Lease been essentially more in the interests of Israel than of
America, or the good of mankind. Now and then someone lets the cat out
of the bag. J. Bernard Hutton, in Hess: the Last of the Third Reich's
Imprisoned Leaders (MacMillan, NY, 1970, p. 180), commented:
"At Nuernberg, all the crimes of the Nazi leaders, and of the Allies,
faded into insignificance beside this one shocking crime of racial
persecution and annihilation. And this was what the Nuernberg Trial
was about -- it was for the crime against the Jews that the Nazi
leaders were punished."
Here the stark and horrid truth of American Foreign Policy is
expressed. Hutton, poor brainwashed fellow (like most other
publicists), believed the legend of the six million. He writes,
"Millions of Jews were rounded up ... driven to prepared killing
centers where they were gassed ..."
Because the atrocity story that the Third Reich exterminated six
million Jews has been the root cause of the most monstrous peace
treaty in history, because it continues to blackmail billions of
unjust reparations to the promoters of the atrocity story, and because
it continues to generate hatred and lies and perjuries, it must have
the top priority of Revisionism. A few courageous historians like
Prof. Paul Rassinier, Dr. Arthur R. Butz, the Jewish Concentration
Camp survivor Josef Burg (Munich) and Richard Harwood, Heinrich
Haertl, lately Hellmut Diwald, in part David Irving, are beginning to
give evidence that the story of the six million exterminated Jews is
both the most enormous and the most brazen and unfounded lie in all of
recorded history. Dr. Butz called his blockbusting breakthrough The
Hoax of the Twentieth Century. After 239 pages of evidence he
concluded flatly, "The Jews of Europe were not exterminated and there
was no German attempt to exterminate them."
Since Dr. Butz wrote those fateful words, there has been such a
frantic resurrection of the Holocaust as to resemble a death rattle.
What intensified the frenzy was Dr. Butz's corollary that if the
extermination was proven false; if the "unspeakable criminal acts" on
which the Luxemburg Treaty justified the reparations to Israel and
Jews are faked; then the reparations become invalidated. The Anti --
Defamation League sponsored an issue of eleven million copies of The
Record: The Holocaust in History, with the slogan, "The Crime we
cannot neglect or forget." A most monumental world -- wide propaganda
production was the T.V. Holocaust, a hybrid documentary soap opera, in
which all the lies of the "Six Million" are regurgitated. The
"saintly" Jewish participants are called Weiss (White), the wicked
Germans are Schwarz (Black). Fact, fiction, and falsehood are so
cleverly mixed that most viewers will carry away only the customary
lies and perjuries about the German treatment of Jews.
In Six Million Did Die (Arthur Suzman and Denis Diamond, Johannesburg,
1978, 137 pages) announces that "the truth shall prevail," and
purposes to refute Richard Harwood's Did Six Million Really Die?,
which sent and continues to send shockwaves through the circles
committed to the lie of the six million. Suzman and Diamond denounce
Harwood for writing that Germany is paying reparations "calculated on
six million dead;" then insist that the reparations represent valid
"material claims ... unaffected by moral -- historical claims" (p.53).
They then quote Chancellor Adenauer (27 Sept. 1951) justifying the
reparations in the Bundestag with the words, "unmentionable crimes
were committed in the name of the German people, which call for moral
and material compensation" (p.51). Obviously if the Third Reich
treated Jews essentially no different from gypsies, or from
Roosevelt's treatment of the Japanese Americans, and much less badly
than the Soviet -- Poles -- Czechs treated the Oder -- Neisse and
Sudeten Germans, then the reparations are totally uncalled for.
A few facts on the Luxemburg Agreement and how Germany became saddled
with reparations to Israel and Jews all over the world of eighty
million D -- Marks, justifies Harwood's contention that the Six
Million accusation is "undoubtedly the most profitable atrocity
allegation of all time." In 1951, twenty -- three Jewish
organizations, in the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against
Germany, demanded (1) funds for relief and rehabilitation of Jewish
victims of Nazi persecution, (2) indemnification for injuries
inflicted upon individual victims of Nazi persecutions.
On 21 March 1952, Bonn and Israel began to negotiate in the Hotel Oud
Wassenen in The Hague. On 7 May 1952, the Israeli Foreign Minister,
Moche Scharett, declared in the Knesset that if Bonn did not advance
new guarantees and payments, Israel would end negotiations with
international consequences that would produce a crisis in Germany.
Nahum Goldman, head of World Zionism, warned Adenauer that if Germany
did not pay up there would be "violent reaction of the whole world"
expressing "deep sympathy with the martyrdom of the Jewish people
during the Nazi period." More impudently, the London Jewish Chronicle
wrote blackmailingly, "The whole international weight of World Jewry
will be mobilized against Germany, if Bonn's offers of reparations
remain unsatisfactory." (Echoes of 1933?)
All the while Bonn had presented to Commissioner John McCloy the draft
of what was to become the Grundvertrag -- the Constitution -- of West
Germany. But McCloy kept delaying ratification. Adenauer wrote in his
Memoirs,
"It was clear to me that, if the negotiations with the Jews failed,
the negotiations at the London Debt Conference would also run aground,
because Jewish banking circles would exert an influence ... which
should not be underestimated."
Thereupon Adenauer, abandoning "democracy" for the time being, went
over the heads of his Ministers and of the German people, and
committed himself and West Germany to pay Israel 3.45 billion D --
Marks reparations; 80 million the first two years. Thereupon
Commissioner McCloy, and France and Britain, on 26 May 1952, ratified
the Constitution giving West Germany a limited sovereignty. Adenauer
had had to agree "that they would not dispute any of the
pronouncements of the Allies during and after World War II." This
included the Nuremberg pronouncements, and the "acceptance of the
legend of the 'extermination' of six million Jews" (Quoted from The
South African Observer, July 1979).
Then after further negotiations about details, the Luxemburg Agreement
was signed on 19 September 1952. Its first Whereas accuses Germans of
"unspeakable criminal acts ... perpetrated against the Jewish people
during the National Socialistic regime of terror" (Six Million Did
Die, p. 53). This certainly founds the reparations to Jews and Israel
on what came to be called the extermination of six million Jews.
From the beginning, the Federal Republic of Germany was a cleverly
disguised and managed satellite "democracy" controlled by Washington
(and London) for the prime benefit of Israel. Never were the German
people given a chance to vote on these reparations. Nor were they ever
asked to vote on whether they approved on continuing war crimes trial
or whether they really wanted the Statute of Limitations honored (as
in every other democratic country).
Adenauer's first pledge of 3.45 billion D -- Marks to Israel, in order
to get McCloy to ratify the Constitution, was the Niagara Falls of
reparations to Jews all over the world and to Israel, a state non --
existent when the "Holocaust" was said to have occurred. This
Luxemburg Agreement, under the umbrella of Washington, in the first
twelve years provided Israel with the following commodities and
services:
"West Germany built an entire merchant marine for Israel (including 59
ships and a drydock), repaired and rebuilt Israel's telephone and
telegraph network, constructed a copper plant, steel plant and five
power plants in Israel, laid 280 kilometers of irrigation pipeline,
laid new railroad tracks over most of the depleted railway system, for
which it delivered 400 boxcars, passenger coaches and diesel
locomotives. One Kibbutz received $200,000."
(Quoted from Instauration, August, 1978.)
This fairy -- godmother bonanza to Israel was kept a deep dark secret
from the German people, under the shadow of a peculiar Zionistic --
Washingtonian democracy. It was also kept secret from the Arabs, who
lost three wars against an attacking enemy equipped with the world's
best German war materiel. When the Arabs found out, it created a
convulsion that destroyed Chancellor Erhard and ever since proved a
millstone for the Christian Democratic Party -- to the advantage of
the socialistic and pro -- Russian Social Democrats of Willy Brandt
and Wehner and Bahr.
The enormity of German reparations to Israel has been kept as secret
as possible from the German people and the world. One has to assume
that the puppet Bonn government is ashamed to reveal that it has been
and is distributing possibly a hundred billion D -- marks to Jews all
over the world, to Israel, to Jewish institutions, and to sponsor
pensions to every Jew -- not who was "gassed" but who was allowed to
leave Hitler's Germany safely and with most of his property. All this
while neither the victors nor Bonn have made any realistic attempt to
help the fourteen million Oder-Neisse and Sudeten Germans get
indemnities from the Communists. Bonn may also fear the end someday of
German patience and an outburst of wrath.
Israel too is very secretive about the payments and pensions the
Israelis got or are getting from Germany. Perhaps they too are
ashamed. More probably, secretly conscious of the enormous blackmail
most of these reparations represent, they fear that if the Western
world became fully informed of the swindle, it would stop turning the
other cheek and demand first of all the full truth, and secondly,
justice for the Arabs. But here and there some Jewish writer boasts of
the goldmine the defamed and slandered Germans have been to them.
Nahum Goldmann, in his book The Jewish Paradox (London, 1978), boasted
that whereas at the Nuremberg Trials one Jewish organization suggested
only the ridiculously small sum of twenty million marks of
reparations, he managed to induce Germany to pay eighty million D --
Marks (p.166 -- 8). Goldmann boasts that without these German
reparations Israel would hardly possess half of its "Infrastruktur":
"All trains, all ships, all electrical works, as well as a major
portion of industry is of German origin." Then he adds "this passes
over entirely the individual pensions which are being paid to the
survivors. At the present time Israel still collects annually hundreds
of millions of dollars in German currency". And ingeniously and
unscrupulously, even now, other wartime disadvantages to Jews are
presented for claims. The Washington Observer, for example, on 15
December 1970, carried the following "Observation":
"The Jewish World Federation of Nazi Victims is pressing another claim
for payment from Germany. This time they want $20 billion for lost
wages for two million Jews who were allegedly forced by the Nazis to
work in factories during the war."
And Jewish publicists never bother to try to reconcile the alleged
gassing of six million with for example the employment of two million
working and surviving in the factories!
Surely, the atrocity story of the extermination of six million Jews
has been and still is the most profitable invention and swindle in
world history. So organized and so supported by perjury is this
"manna" from the German taxpayer that one might suspect virtually
every Zionist in the world or someone in his family of being a
beneficiary of a pension or an indemnity based on the lie of the six
million.
The damage this lie of the six million has done is enormous. It ruined
the peace; it inspired the awful injustices of the Yalta and Potsdam
peace treaties. But a world that wants to lay claim to justice and
decency must correct the wrongs of those treaties. The beginning must
be made by establishing the truth about the policy of the Third Reich
towards Jews.
In 1973, in my booklet, The Six Million Swindle (40 pages, Boniface
Press, 8207 Flower Ave., Takoma Park, Md. 20012, 50 cents), I entitled
one short section: "Eight Incontrovertible Assertions on the Six
Million Swindle." Since then brave and scholarly studies have
destroyed every foundation for the "Holocaust" and exposed the story
of the six million "gassed" as an impudent lie. They have not
invalidated, they have confirmed, my assertions. I conclude by quoting
them:
First, the Third Reich wanted to get Jews to emigrate, not to
liquidate them physically. Had they intended extermination, 500,000
concentration camp survivors would not now be in Israel to collect
fancy indemnities from West Germany.
Second, absolutely no Jews were "gassed" in any concentration camps.
There were crematoria for cremating corpses who had died from whatever
cause, including especially also the victims of the genocidic Anglo --
American air raids.
Third, the majority of Jews who died in pogroms and those who
disappeared and are still unaccounted for fell afoul in territories
controlled by the Soviet Russians, not in territories while under
German control.
Fourth, most of the Jews alleged to have met their death at the hands
of Germans were subversives, partisans, spies, and criminals, and also
often victims of unfortunate but internationally legal reprisals. One
reason for my denouncing the Nuremberg prosecutors as lynchers is that
they hanged Germans for actions they themselves adopted!
Fifth, if there were the slightest likelihood that the Nazis had in
fact executed six million Jews, World Jewry would scream for subsidies
with which to do research on the question, and Israel would throw its
archives and files open to historians. They have not done so. On the
contrary they have persecuted anyone who tries to investigate
impartially and even call him an anti -- Semite. This is really
devastating evidence that the figure is a swindle.
Sixth, the Jews and the media who exploit this figure have never
offered a shred of valid evidence for its truth. At most they misquote
Hoettl, Höss, and Eichmann who spoke only casually of what they were
in no position to know or to speak on reliably. Nor do the Jews
themselves credit these witnesses as reliable even when they comment
on what they could know, e.g., that the concentration camps were
essentially work camps, not death camps!
Seventh, the burden of proof for the six million figure rests on the
accusers, not the accused. This is a principle of all civilized law.
Proving true guilt is easier than proving true innocence. It is hardly
possible for a man accused of cheating on his wife to prove that he
did not cheat on her. Therefore the accuser must prove his charge.
This responsibility the Zionists and Bolsheviks have not accepted, and
the browbeaten Germans have rather paid billions than to dare to
demand proof!
Eighth, obvious evidence that the figure of six million has no
scientific foundation is that Jewish scholars themselves present
ridiculous discrepancies in their calculations. And honest ones, whom
we recognize by the fact that their co-racialists smear -- terrorize
them, and even beat them up, invariably lower the six million
estimate.
Those who throw around large round numbers, like six million gassed,
four million in Auschwitz, two million by mobile units in Russia, let
them come up with the proofs -- the graves, the bones, the ashes. Six
million corpses do not just disappear. They accuse, so they must
prove. But in their default, it seems that it is up to us Revisionists
to show that the figure of six million is a totally unsubstantiated,
brazen lie. What slender means I have had at my disposal, including
some ten trips to Europe, including Dachau, Arolsen, and many
interviews, induce me to estimate the number of Jewish casualties
under the Third Reich at 300,000 in round numbers. Until Jewish
publicists come up with solid evidence to the contrary, which so far
they have not even realistically tried to do, I will consider 300,000
casualties -- some from executions, from reprisals, most of them (like
Anne Frank) from diseases.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v01/v01p-43_App.html
I am highly gratified -- and I am sure all the other speakers are too
-- that the Institute for Historical Review had the inspiration and
the courage to organize this 1979 Revisionist Convention. It is badly
needed and long overdue.
Every major war is conducted on tidal waves of propaganda, fair and
foul. World War II, because it involved almost the whole world, and
because the victors insisted on Unconditional Surrender, and because
their side included the two most vengeful and vindictive ideologies in
the world, Bolshevism and Zionism, also was guilty of the most
shameless and unscrupulous propaganda so far on record. In part
because of the never-forget -- never-forgive mentality, World War II
Allied atrocity propaganda has not ebbed down but kept in high tide,
as with the recent phony documentary the NBC-TV Holocaust.
Therefore Historical Revisionism is more important than after any
other war: the more atrocity -- and hate-mongering vitiate the terms
of peace, as at Yalta and Potsdam, the more Revisionism is needed to
heal the wounds. The Institute for Historical Review does a vital
service both to historical scholarship and also to basic values.
Since 1946, when mostly from small back-page items in brave little
publications, I soon was sickened by mountains of evidence of the
bestialities of the victors, especially the Soviet-Russians. In anger
I published Ravishing the Women of Conquered Europe. The subtitle was:
"The Big Three Liberators at Work Having a Wonderful Time Raping and
Debauching the Women of Germany, Austria and Hungary; Re-Educating
Them to Become Good Christians." I followed this with History's Most
Terrifying Peace. I got thousands and thousands of grateful letters.
But I also discovered what hatred and recriminations historical truth
provokes among the vindictive vipers in public affairs and in the
press!
For me it feels good after thirteen years to see California again. In
June 1966 I spoke at the San Diego Mann Jr. High School on "Police
Brutality a Phony Cry." But even farther back, in 1923-24 I spent a
year in San Francisco, which climaxed with my taking a national
scholarship examination (at St. Mary's College). What I won was a
Knights of Columbus four-year full Fellowship to the Catholic
University of America, in D.C., a milestone in my career. Being here
today unrolls the kaleidoscope of a lifetime before me.
It was a lifetime during which I was ever painfully conscious of the
ugly lies about the world wars, which sabotaged the ideals expressed
in the Fourteen Points and the Atlantic Charter. I am sorry to
conclude that American foreign policy has never been consistently wise
or fair; and, if anything, it is even now getting worse rather than
better. General Douglas MacArthur in 1952 (U.S. News, 18 July1952)
said:
"Foreign policy has been as tragically in error as has domestic
policy. We practically invited Soviet dominion over the free peoples
of Eastern Europe ... permitting the advance of the Soviet forces to
the West to plant the red flag of Communism on the ramparts of Berlin,
Vienna and Prague, capitals of Western civilization."
In a similar vein former President Herbert Hoover said,
"The souls of one quarter of mankind have been seared by the violation
of that American promise [namely, Wilson's Fourteen Points and
Roosevelt's Atlantic Charter]. The ghosts of the Four Freedoms and the
Atlantic Charter now wander amid the clanking chains of a thousand
slave camps." (U.S. News, 18 July 1952)
The tragic fact is that America, far from having made the world safe
for democracy and self-determination, got into and won the war by
spreading so much hatred and atrocity propaganda about the Germans
that at the end the leaders and the people wanted, not justice, but
vengeance and reparations. They wanted kangaroo war crimes trials for
the losers. In place of self-determination, the victors dismembered
Germany and Austria, tore provinces away and totally robbed and
expelled the inhabitants -- twelve million of them -- shipped her
factories to Soviet Russia, instituted ex post facto laws and trials
to hang Germans. While having from the beginning declared Allied war
criminals, including Jews, untouchable, the Israelis and Bolsheviks
have bludgeoned West Germany to keep persecuting so-called Nazis even
to the present day. This June for the third time, under the leadership
of Simon Wiesenthal, and in disregard of the democratic rights of the
German people, the Bonn Parliament revoked for another spell of years
the Statute of Limitations.
Recently President Carter said that American "causes were always
just." William F. Buckley (Star, 19 July 1979) commented that,
"There was very little justice in the Mexican war, in the
Spanish-American war, or in the seizure of Vera Cruz. ... our
intervention in Vietnam, rather than our failure to consummate our
mission there, was the unjust thing."
The unhappy mission of Revisionists will have to be to show that we
got unjustly into both world wars against Germany, and, to our
everlasting shame and sorrow, did probably more harm than any nation
ever did before -- in that the U.S., and only the U.S., had the means
to lend-lease Soviet-Russia into Berlin -- into the heart of Western
Europe.
Anglo-American propaganda has managed to represent the Entente or the
Allies as the "good guys" and the Germans and the Axis as the "bad
guys." This is to fool the people and foul up the peace. The intrinsic
reason America intervened in European wars to destroy Germany was not
ethics but power politics. When America saw that Germany was clearly
the strongest nation in Europe, the U.S. began to side with the second
-- strongest there, Britain.
But the American people preferred neutrality. Therefore they had to be
exposed to horrendous atrocity propaganda, such as that the Kaiser
wanted to rule the world, that Germans cut the hands off Belgian
babies, that submarine warfare made all Germans criminals. Even so, a
third factor had to be mobilized to grease America's entry into World
War I. That factor was the Balfour Declaration.
Jews had for centuries been best treated by Germany and Austria and
felt most congenial there, even to adopting Yiddish as their language.
Consequently for the first two years of World War I American Jews were
sympathetic to the Central Powers, and certainly against Czarist
Russia. The British War Cabinet, in the face of German victories,
decided to change the "very pro -- German tendency among the wealthy
American Jewish bankers and bond issuing houses" (See Conrad Grieb,
The Balfour Declaration, N.Y., 1972, p. 3). The Zionist quid pro quo
was for Britain to establish "a national home for the Jewish people in
Palestine" and the Zionists to get America into the war on the side of
Britain. The Balfour Declaration followed, dated 2 November 1917.
Perverting the American Jews from neutrality to intervention against
the Central Powers had been pushed for a year or more -- with success.
What helped to make moralistic Wilson a rabid interventionist was the
illicit affair he had had with a colleague's wife, Mrs. Peck
(remarried, Mrs. Hulburt). Her stepson needed $40,000 to keep him out
of jail. The stepmother asked President Wilson for the money, in
exchange for which she would return to him the packet of love letters
he had written her. When Wilson could not pay this amount, Samuel
Untermeyer rushed to the rescue: If President Wilson would appoint a
Jew to the next vacancy on the Supreme Court, Untermeyer would settle
Mrs. Peck's claim. Thus it happened that America was "blessed" with
its first Jew on the Supreme Bench, and the interventionists on 18
January 1916 got a radical Zionist in a prestige position to help get
America into World War 1.
On 2 April 1917, using as a pretext the sinking of the Sussex (which
in fact had not been sunk), Wilson asked Congress on 2 April 1917, for
a declaration of war against Germany. Dr. E.J. Dillon, in his The
Inside Story of the Peace Conference, wrote, "Henceforth the world
will be governed by the Anglo-Saxon peoples, who in turn are swayed by
their Jewish elements" (See Grieb. op. cit., p.7).
The Balfour Declaration sowed discord between the Germanic and the
Jewish people, which in very fact led to World War II; to a
Morgenthauistic and Bolshevik conclusion; to the expulsion by the
Zionists of the Palestinians; and the sort of continuing friction
which could bring about the Third World War. In this, all symptoms
point to American's being again involved, not on the side of justice
and the Palestinians, but as in World War II on the side of the Jews.
If Soviet Russia were then to help the Arabs, the lines for it would
be drawn -- with America once again, as in World War II, crusading on
the wrong side.
During the Weimar Republic German Jews did not talk or act like
patriotic Germans. They were nihilisic, they denigrated the Wehrmacht;
Walter Mehring called the Stahlhelm dirt (Dreck), Kurt Tucholsky
called German volunteers of 1914 victims of mass drunkenness, Arnold
Zweig called the German people a nation of murderers and vote cattle.
On my first visit to Germany in 1931 I was shocked by this Jewish
pejorativeness. When during the Vietnam war I read the American press,
the Washington Post and New York Times and most of the rest, I
recalled the similarity.
When Hitler became Chancellor his Third Reich government was the
victim of every possible worldwide resistance and smear. It was an
indiscriminate opposition on the part of world Jewry, not only where
Hitler was or might have been wrong, but also where he was obviously
right, as when he demanded the self -- determination for Austria, the
Sudetenland, and Danzig which the victors in 1919 had denied. As early
as 1933, before Hitler had harmed a single Jew, an International
Jewish Boycott Conference, presided over by Samuel Untermeyer, the
same who had paid Wilson $40,000 to appoint Brandeis Supreme Court
justice in 1916, declared a crippling boycott on the Third Reich,
while it was still in the throes of the inhuman reparations imposed at
Versailles.
The boycott included not only the United States but some eight or more
other countries. Simultaneously the anti -- German propaganda of World
War I was revived. And be it noted the International Jewish Boycott
did not exempt the Jews of Germany from this hostile action. Nor did
it keep it merely a Jewish action, but succeeded in pressuring the
United States to cooperate with it: it imposed a general tariff
against German goods as against the "most favored" status for all
other nations, while International Financial interests tried to "call"
sufficient German treasury notes to "break" Germany (see John Beaty,
The Iron Curtain Over America, 1951, p. 63). The fact is that U.S.
foreign policy from 1933 on was directed more to further Zionist
interests rather than those of the U.S. or of the American people.
At Versailles the peace dictators had violated the right of self --
determination of Austria, of the Sudeten Germans, and of the Corridor
and Danzig. Germany had the right and the duty to champion this right
for these people. Hitler did this, and was on the point of settling
for a road through the Corridor and the return of Danzig, an ancient
German city of 400,000.
What honest historians call the Unnecessary War broke out over this
last injustice of Versailles, the worst and most costly war in
history. Why did Poland refuse to negotiate? Because Britain
guaranteed to go to war for Poland. Why did Britain give this foolish
and tragic promise? Ambassador Joseph Kennedy, as related in the
Forrestal Diaries, 27 Dec. 1945, reveals that the war broke out over
Roosevelt's catering to Zionist interests, not to America's, nor even
Britain's. We read:
"Neither the French nor the British would have made Poland a cause of
war if it had not been for the constant needling from Washington ...
Chamberlain, he says, stated that America and the world Jews had
forced England into war."
Even worse, though the American people overwhelmingly wanted us to
avoid the stupidity of intervention against Germany as in World War I,
the same forces, Roosevelt and the Zionists, used every strategy to
involve us. The insults and calumnies Zionist publicists hurled at
Hitler, while the U.S. was still neutral, and before anyone had
invented the atrocity story of the six million Jews "gassed", might
have provoked any sovereign nation to hit back. Dr. Harry Elmer Barnes
wrote that there is
"No greater paradox in history than a war in behalf of Poland on the
basis of the Jewish issue. There were in Poland, in 1933, six times as
many Jews as in Germany, and they were surely treated as badly as were
German Jews under Hitler." (See Blasting the Historical Blackout,
p.35)
Nevertheless, before there was any mention of a so -- called
"Holocaust," and while America was still neutral, American Zionists,
with the approval of the media, produced the most mass genocidic book
in history: Theodore N. Kaufman in Germany Must Perish (Argyle Press,
Newark, 1941) literally urged the sterilization of 48,000,000 German
men and women of childbearing age, so that, he explained, Germanism
will be extirpated in two generations.
Once, as Clare Booth Luce said, Roosevelt had lied America into the
war by the back door -- by provoking the Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbor -- the same Rooseveltians and Zionists immediately started not
only to propagandize for Unconditional Victory but for destroying
Germany forever. The propaganda thrust was not for achieving a durable
peace soon, but for permanent Unconditional Hatred. Among the most
bestial peace plans in history ranks that of the Secretary of the
Treasury, Henry Morgenthau Jr., assisted by a parcel of Zionists,
chief of whom was Harry Dexter White, later exposed as a Communist
spy. Morgenthau without a blush of shame for his monumental atrocity
wrote Germany Is Our Problem (Harper, NY, 1945). It describes the
Morgenthau Plan for the pastoralization of Germany which Morgenthau
presented to Roosevelt and Churchill at the Quebec Conference in 1944.
Germany was to lose most of its territory, all of its manufacturing
facilities, and live by farming but without machinery. The mines of
the Ruhr were to be destroyed, its five million Germans deported --
Morgenthau said he did not care how they would be taken care of. Even
harsh peace advocates like Cordell Hull and H.L. Stimson had enough
humanity left in them to be appalled. They protested that the plan
would starve thirty million Germans to death. Yet Roosevelt and
Churchill, who had so piously proclaimed the Atlantic Charter,
approved this most murderous peace plan in history. During the last
year of the war, with victory visible, Jewish publicists demanded a
Morgenthau peace, did not urge what was 'good for Europe and America',
but what ministered to the vindictiveness and eye -- for -- an --
eyism of Zionists. Richard M. Bruckner wrote Is Germany Incurable?
(Philadelphia, 1943); Dr. L.M. Birk, head, Director of Friends of
Democracy, demanded that "Germany should be removed from the map;" and
Louis Nizer in What to Do with Germany, published in 1944, urged that
"150,000 German leaders should be tried and sentenced up to life." In
the meanwhile Stalin's Jewish propaganda minister, Ilya Ehrenburg,
inflamed the Bolshevik invaders of Germany to
"Kill. In Germany, nothing is guiltless. Neither the living nor the
yet unborn ... Ravish them (the German women) as booty. Kill, you
gallant Red soldiers."
When Jewish publicists urged vengeance on the Germans, they served the
vindictiveness of the Zionists and the barbarous expansionism of
Soviet Russia, not the good of the West Europeans and Americans. Even
Stalin, when peace was in sight, restrained Ehrenburg's hate
propaganda as a hindrance to making peace.
In past wars, when the enemy surrendered, the atrocity propaganda
ebbed off. But after World War II this propaganda intensified after
Unconditional Surrender. We ask why. For whose benefit? A few days
after Surrender, Prof. Friedrich Grimm was interviewed by (who unknown
to him) was Sefton Delmer, the British War Propaganda Chief, who
boasted, "I am of the Central Office you talked about: Atrocity
propaganda -- and with it we won the total victory." When Dr. Grimm
said, "I know, and now you must stop it!" Sefton Delmer retorted:
"No, now we shall start all the more! We shall continue this atrocity
propaganda, we shall intensify it, until nobody shall accept a good
word from Germans anymore, until all the sympathy you had in other
countries shall be destroyed, and until the Germans themselves shall
be so confused that they do not know anymore what they are doing!"
(Quoted from Udo Walendy's The Methods of Reeducation, p. 8)
Here is revealed the strategy of infamy of the selfproclaimed
crusaders for world peace and brotherhood. The deluge of atrocity
propaganda against Germany during and after the war triggered
history's most terrifying peace, and left a legacy of injustices which
the U.S. is morally bound to try to correct. The worst of these is the
monumental expulsion of fourteen million Oder -- Neisse and Sudeten
Germans, killing nearly three million of them, raping many of their
women, and now letting Soviet Russia, and Poland, and Czechoslovakia
claim those ancient German lands.
Worse psychologically, and unique in history, is the reeducation and
the monstrously clever creation of a German government that toadies to
intemational, Zionistic interests. Harry Elmer Barnes, commenting on
Prof. Hoggan's visit to West Germany in April -- May, 1964, and his
hasty reception by Bonn and the media, wrote,
"The German situation in 1964 is a case of fantastic political
masochism without parallel in human history. I know of no other
instance in history where a people have almost frantically sought to
cast the dark shadow of guilt upon themselves for a public crime they
did not commit -- exclusive responsibility for the second world war.
... in 1964, those who sought the truth about 1939 were being vilified
and even exposed to prosecution as public criminals by the Bonn
Government."
(Unpublished manuscript, Malibu, Calif. 1 July 1964)
What has limited true German autonomy; what has kept Washington and
London from agitating to get the Wall out of Berlin and the Iron
Curtain out of Central Europe; what has kept Washington from ever
alluding to the human rights of the seventeen million Germans of the
German Democratic Republic; what has, if you will, kept Washington
from insisting that Rudolf Hess be freed from Spandau before another
bushel of wheat be sold to Soviet Russia, is in the final analysis the
Zionist and Communist agitation about the Third Reich's alleged
extermination of Jews.
The simple truth is that U.S. Foreign Policy has since Roosevelt's
Lend -- Lease been essentially more in the interests of Israel than of
America, or the good of mankind. Now and then someone lets the cat out
of the bag. J. Bernard Hutton, in Hess: the Last of the Third Reich's
Imprisoned Leaders (MacMillan, NY, 1970, p. 180), commented:
"At Nuernberg, all the crimes of the Nazi leaders, and of the Allies,
faded into insignificance beside this one shocking crime of racial
persecution and annihilation. And this was what the Nuernberg Trial
was about -- it was for the crime against the Jews that the Nazi
leaders were punished."
Here the stark and horrid truth of American Foreign Policy is
expressed. Hutton, poor brainwashed fellow (like most other
publicists), believed the legend of the six million. He writes,
"Millions of Jews were rounded up ... driven to prepared killing
centers where they were gassed ..."
Because the atrocity story that the Third Reich exterminated six
million Jews has been the root cause of the most monstrous peace
treaty in history, because it continues to blackmail billions of
unjust reparations to the promoters of the atrocity story, and because
it continues to generate hatred and lies and perjuries, it must have
the top priority of Revisionism. A few courageous historians like
Prof. Paul Rassinier, Dr. Arthur R. Butz, the Jewish Concentration
Camp survivor Josef Burg (Munich) and Richard Harwood, Heinrich
Haertl, lately Hellmut Diwald, in part David Irving, are beginning to
give evidence that the story of the six million exterminated Jews is
both the most enormous and the most brazen and unfounded lie in all of
recorded history. Dr. Butz called his blockbusting breakthrough The
Hoax of the Twentieth Century. After 239 pages of evidence he
concluded flatly, "The Jews of Europe were not exterminated and there
was no German attempt to exterminate them."
Since Dr. Butz wrote those fateful words, there has been such a
frantic resurrection of the Holocaust as to resemble a death rattle.
What intensified the frenzy was Dr. Butz's corollary that if the
extermination was proven false; if the "unspeakable criminal acts" on
which the Luxemburg Treaty justified the reparations to Israel and
Jews are faked; then the reparations become invalidated. The Anti --
Defamation League sponsored an issue of eleven million copies of The
Record: The Holocaust in History, with the slogan, "The Crime we
cannot neglect or forget." A most monumental world -- wide propaganda
production was the T.V. Holocaust, a hybrid documentary soap opera, in
which all the lies of the "Six Million" are regurgitated. The
"saintly" Jewish participants are called Weiss (White), the wicked
Germans are Schwarz (Black). Fact, fiction, and falsehood are so
cleverly mixed that most viewers will carry away only the customary
lies and perjuries about the German treatment of Jews.
In Six Million Did Die (Arthur Suzman and Denis Diamond, Johannesburg,
1978, 137 pages) announces that "the truth shall prevail," and
purposes to refute Richard Harwood's Did Six Million Really Die?,
which sent and continues to send shockwaves through the circles
committed to the lie of the six million. Suzman and Diamond denounce
Harwood for writing that Germany is paying reparations "calculated on
six million dead;" then insist that the reparations represent valid
"material claims ... unaffected by moral -- historical claims" (p.53).
They then quote Chancellor Adenauer (27 Sept. 1951) justifying the
reparations in the Bundestag with the words, "unmentionable crimes
were committed in the name of the German people, which call for moral
and material compensation" (p.51). Obviously if the Third Reich
treated Jews essentially no different from gypsies, or from
Roosevelt's treatment of the Japanese Americans, and much less badly
than the Soviet -- Poles -- Czechs treated the Oder -- Neisse and
Sudeten Germans, then the reparations are totally uncalled for.
A few facts on the Luxemburg Agreement and how Germany became saddled
with reparations to Israel and Jews all over the world of eighty
million D -- Marks, justifies Harwood's contention that the Six
Million accusation is "undoubtedly the most profitable atrocity
allegation of all time." In 1951, twenty -- three Jewish
organizations, in the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against
Germany, demanded (1) funds for relief and rehabilitation of Jewish
victims of Nazi persecution, (2) indemnification for injuries
inflicted upon individual victims of Nazi persecutions.
On 21 March 1952, Bonn and Israel began to negotiate in the Hotel Oud
Wassenen in The Hague. On 7 May 1952, the Israeli Foreign Minister,
Moche Scharett, declared in the Knesset that if Bonn did not advance
new guarantees and payments, Israel would end negotiations with
international consequences that would produce a crisis in Germany.
Nahum Goldman, head of World Zionism, warned Adenauer that if Germany
did not pay up there would be "violent reaction of the whole world"
expressing "deep sympathy with the martyrdom of the Jewish people
during the Nazi period." More impudently, the London Jewish Chronicle
wrote blackmailingly, "The whole international weight of World Jewry
will be mobilized against Germany, if Bonn's offers of reparations
remain unsatisfactory." (Echoes of 1933?)
All the while Bonn had presented to Commissioner John McCloy the draft
of what was to become the Grundvertrag -- the Constitution -- of West
Germany. But McCloy kept delaying ratification. Adenauer wrote in his
Memoirs,
"It was clear to me that, if the negotiations with the Jews failed,
the negotiations at the London Debt Conference would also run aground,
because Jewish banking circles would exert an influence ... which
should not be underestimated."
Thereupon Adenauer, abandoning "democracy" for the time being, went
over the heads of his Ministers and of the German people, and
committed himself and West Germany to pay Israel 3.45 billion D --
Marks reparations; 80 million the first two years. Thereupon
Commissioner McCloy, and France and Britain, on 26 May 1952, ratified
the Constitution giving West Germany a limited sovereignty. Adenauer
had had to agree "that they would not dispute any of the
pronouncements of the Allies during and after World War II." This
included the Nuremberg pronouncements, and the "acceptance of the
legend of the 'extermination' of six million Jews" (Quoted from The
South African Observer, July 1979).
Then after further negotiations about details, the Luxemburg Agreement
was signed on 19 September 1952. Its first Whereas accuses Germans of
"unspeakable criminal acts ... perpetrated against the Jewish people
during the National Socialistic regime of terror" (Six Million Did
Die, p. 53). This certainly founds the reparations to Jews and Israel
on what came to be called the extermination of six million Jews.
From the beginning, the Federal Republic of Germany was a cleverly
disguised and managed satellite "democracy" controlled by Washington
(and London) for the prime benefit of Israel. Never were the German
people given a chance to vote on these reparations. Nor were they ever
asked to vote on whether they approved on continuing war crimes trial
or whether they really wanted the Statute of Limitations honored (as
in every other democratic country).
Adenauer's first pledge of 3.45 billion D -- Marks to Israel, in order
to get McCloy to ratify the Constitution, was the Niagara Falls of
reparations to Jews all over the world and to Israel, a state non --
existent when the "Holocaust" was said to have occurred. This
Luxemburg Agreement, under the umbrella of Washington, in the first
twelve years provided Israel with the following commodities and
services:
"West Germany built an entire merchant marine for Israel (including 59
ships and a drydock), repaired and rebuilt Israel's telephone and
telegraph network, constructed a copper plant, steel plant and five
power plants in Israel, laid 280 kilometers of irrigation pipeline,
laid new railroad tracks over most of the depleted railway system, for
which it delivered 400 boxcars, passenger coaches and diesel
locomotives. One Kibbutz received $200,000."
(Quoted from Instauration, August, 1978.)
This fairy -- godmother bonanza to Israel was kept a deep dark secret
from the German people, under the shadow of a peculiar Zionistic --
Washingtonian democracy. It was also kept secret from the Arabs, who
lost three wars against an attacking enemy equipped with the world's
best German war materiel. When the Arabs found out, it created a
convulsion that destroyed Chancellor Erhard and ever since proved a
millstone for the Christian Democratic Party -- to the advantage of
the socialistic and pro -- Russian Social Democrats of Willy Brandt
and Wehner and Bahr.
The enormity of German reparations to Israel has been kept as secret
as possible from the German people and the world. One has to assume
that the puppet Bonn government is ashamed to reveal that it has been
and is distributing possibly a hundred billion D -- marks to Jews all
over the world, to Israel, to Jewish institutions, and to sponsor
pensions to every Jew -- not who was "gassed" but who was allowed to
leave Hitler's Germany safely and with most of his property. All this
while neither the victors nor Bonn have made any realistic attempt to
help the fourteen million Oder-Neisse and Sudeten Germans get
indemnities from the Communists. Bonn may also fear the end someday of
German patience and an outburst of wrath.
Israel too is very secretive about the payments and pensions the
Israelis got or are getting from Germany. Perhaps they too are
ashamed. More probably, secretly conscious of the enormous blackmail
most of these reparations represent, they fear that if the Western
world became fully informed of the swindle, it would stop turning the
other cheek and demand first of all the full truth, and secondly,
justice for the Arabs. But here and there some Jewish writer boasts of
the goldmine the defamed and slandered Germans have been to them.
Nahum Goldmann, in his book The Jewish Paradox (London, 1978), boasted
that whereas at the Nuremberg Trials one Jewish organization suggested
only the ridiculously small sum of twenty million marks of
reparations, he managed to induce Germany to pay eighty million D --
Marks (p.166 -- 8). Goldmann boasts that without these German
reparations Israel would hardly possess half of its "Infrastruktur":
"All trains, all ships, all electrical works, as well as a major
portion of industry is of German origin." Then he adds "this passes
over entirely the individual pensions which are being paid to the
survivors. At the present time Israel still collects annually hundreds
of millions of dollars in German currency". And ingeniously and
unscrupulously, even now, other wartime disadvantages to Jews are
presented for claims. The Washington Observer, for example, on 15
December 1970, carried the following "Observation":
"The Jewish World Federation of Nazi Victims is pressing another claim
for payment from Germany. This time they want $20 billion for lost
wages for two million Jews who were allegedly forced by the Nazis to
work in factories during the war."
And Jewish publicists never bother to try to reconcile the alleged
gassing of six million with for example the employment of two million
working and surviving in the factories!
Surely, the atrocity story of the extermination of six million Jews
has been and still is the most profitable invention and swindle in
world history. So organized and so supported by perjury is this
"manna" from the German taxpayer that one might suspect virtually
every Zionist in the world or someone in his family of being a
beneficiary of a pension or an indemnity based on the lie of the six
million.
The damage this lie of the six million has done is enormous. It ruined
the peace; it inspired the awful injustices of the Yalta and Potsdam
peace treaties. But a world that wants to lay claim to justice and
decency must correct the wrongs of those treaties. The beginning must
be made by establishing the truth about the policy of the Third Reich
towards Jews.
In 1973, in my booklet, The Six Million Swindle (40 pages, Boniface
Press, 8207 Flower Ave., Takoma Park, Md. 20012, 50 cents), I entitled
one short section: "Eight Incontrovertible Assertions on the Six
Million Swindle." Since then brave and scholarly studies have
destroyed every foundation for the "Holocaust" and exposed the story
of the six million "gassed" as an impudent lie. They have not
invalidated, they have confirmed, my assertions. I conclude by quoting
them:
First, the Third Reich wanted to get Jews to emigrate, not to
liquidate them physically. Had they intended extermination, 500,000
concentration camp survivors would not now be in Israel to collect
fancy indemnities from West Germany.
Second, absolutely no Jews were "gassed" in any concentration camps.
There were crematoria for cremating corpses who had died from whatever
cause, including especially also the victims of the genocidic Anglo --
American air raids.
Third, the majority of Jews who died in pogroms and those who
disappeared and are still unaccounted for fell afoul in territories
controlled by the Soviet Russians, not in territories while under
German control.
Fourth, most of the Jews alleged to have met their death at the hands
of Germans were subversives, partisans, spies, and criminals, and also
often victims of unfortunate but internationally legal reprisals. One
reason for my denouncing the Nuremberg prosecutors as lynchers is that
they hanged Germans for actions they themselves adopted!
Fifth, if there were the slightest likelihood that the Nazis had in
fact executed six million Jews, World Jewry would scream for subsidies
with which to do research on the question, and Israel would throw its
archives and files open to historians. They have not done so. On the
contrary they have persecuted anyone who tries to investigate
impartially and even call him an anti -- Semite. This is really
devastating evidence that the figure is a swindle.
Sixth, the Jews and the media who exploit this figure have never
offered a shred of valid evidence for its truth. At most they misquote
Hoettl, Höss, and Eichmann who spoke only casually of what they were
in no position to know or to speak on reliably. Nor do the Jews
themselves credit these witnesses as reliable even when they comment
on what they could know, e.g., that the concentration camps were
essentially work camps, not death camps!
Seventh, the burden of proof for the six million figure rests on the
accusers, not the accused. This is a principle of all civilized law.
Proving true guilt is easier than proving true innocence. It is hardly
possible for a man accused of cheating on his wife to prove that he
did not cheat on her. Therefore the accuser must prove his charge.
This responsibility the Zionists and Bolsheviks have not accepted, and
the browbeaten Germans have rather paid billions than to dare to
demand proof!
Eighth, obvious evidence that the figure of six million has no
scientific foundation is that Jewish scholars themselves present
ridiculous discrepancies in their calculations. And honest ones, whom
we recognize by the fact that their co-racialists smear -- terrorize
them, and even beat them up, invariably lower the six million
estimate.
Those who throw around large round numbers, like six million gassed,
four million in Auschwitz, two million by mobile units in Russia, let
them come up with the proofs -- the graves, the bones, the ashes. Six
million corpses do not just disappear. They accuse, so they must
prove. But in their default, it seems that it is up to us Revisionists
to show that the figure of six million is a totally unsubstantiated,
brazen lie. What slender means I have had at my disposal, including
some ten trips to Europe, including Dachau, Arolsen, and many
interviews, induce me to estimate the number of Jewish casualties
under the Third Reich at 300,000 in round numbers. Until Jewish
publicists come up with solid evidence to the contrary, which so far
they have not even realistically tried to do, I will consider 300,000
casualties -- some from executions, from reprisals, most of them (like
Anne Frank) from diseases.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v01/v01p-43_App.html
